ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Distributed systems, forts.kurs, lp3 VT11, TDA297/DIT290

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-18 - 2011-03-24
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Rebecca S»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 9 47%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 42%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 10%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

19 svarande

0%» 1 5%

25%» 5 26%

50%» 1 5%

75%» 7 36%

100%» 5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.52 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 6 31%

The goals are difficult to understand» 2 10%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 7 36%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 4 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 4 26%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 11 73%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.73

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

19 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all» 2 10%

To some extent» 6 31%

Yes, definitely» 7 36%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 3 15%

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent» 7 36%

To some extent» 6 31%

Large extent» 6 31%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- Sometimes it is difficult to understand» (To some extent)
- Sometimes it was hard following the lectures, but reading the slides afterwards helped and was a big advantage to be able to understand» (To some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent» 3 16%

Some extent» 7 38%

Large extent» 5 27%

Great extent» 3 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- Lectures very little, the lecture slides very much.» (?)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly» 2 11%

Rather badly» 3 16%

Rather well» 10 55%

Very well» 3 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- The lecture slides where really bad. They should be in PDF, spellchecked and not haveing to be viewed in slideshow mode. » (Very badly)
- The response on the laborations was not that quick.» (Rather badly)
- Could take up to one week for the slides to appear on the web page. I think it"s better to have access to the slides before the lecture.» (Rather badly)
- It would preferable if the slides were available before the lectures, then you can prepare and get more out of the lecture.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor» 1 5%

Rather poor» 2 10%

Rather good» 8 42%

Very good» 7 36%

I did not seek help» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly» 2 10%

Rather poorly» 1 5%

Rather well» 4 21%

Very well» 11 57%

I did not seek coopeation» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- This is the third time I work with a foreign student that has not the right prerequesist to complete the labs.» (Very poorly)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor» 3 15%

Fair» 3 15%

Adequate» 7 36%

Good» 5 26%

Excellent» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.89

- The lectures could have been much better, with better preparations and better examples.» (Adequate)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Nothing»
- The labs were good.»
- lab course and presentation»
- labs»
- The lab assignments»
- The labs are pretty good!»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More info in the last lab. How many collected messages to aim for and maybe some hints because we tried a lot of different algorithms that we thought would be great but they weren"t. Have no idea if it"s because we implemented it wrong or if they really are bad.»
- everything»
- The lectures and the slides were difficult to understand.»
- Nothing»
- Better lecture slides. And they should be available in PDF and they should be organized so that you don"t have to view them in slideshow mode. It was very ineffective this year.»
- Maybe to make the lectures more pedagogic, with better structure on the slides.»
- One _need_ to make it an advanced course. One can"t have the same lab for the prerequisite course as the continuation course.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

14. Additional comments

- No, generally i consider it a quite good course»
- Otherwise the course is very interesting and deals with my favourite topics»
- Why is there no STRUCTURE to any course. Why are some slides in pdf, some in ppt, and some in pptx? Do you require all students to have the latest version of Microsoft Office in order to read all the material? We"re all pirates, so in reality it works OK, but it"s really immoral of you to have it this way. PDF is cross-platform, ppt is NOT.»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.57
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.39

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från