Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Physics of nuclear reactors, TIF210
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-02-02 - 2011-02-15 Antal svar: 12 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80% Kontaktperson: Christophe Demaziere» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.12 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 25% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 25% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 16% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 8% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 12 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 2 | | 16% |
75%» | | 3 | | 25% |
100%» | | 7 | | 58% |
Genomsnitt: 4.41 - Very good teaching!» (100%)
- Good teaching!!» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?12 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 33% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 8 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.11 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 8 | | 72% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 3 | | 27% |
Genomsnitt: 2.27 - It"s between reasonable and too high, thus a little high. More math knowledge should be cleared first before the massive fluid-mechanics. I think too much things are put into this course.» (No, the goals are set too high)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?12 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 7 | | 58% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?12 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 16% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 7 | | 58% |
Genomsnitt: 3.41 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 36% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45 8. Teaching methodsThe teaching method was based on rather detailed lectures notes that the students were asked to read prior to each lecture and on lectures pointing out the main points of the lecture notes. How did this method work for you?12 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 8% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 41% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.41 - It"s normal, not good nor bad. Too many equations can be killing.» (Rather well)
- Good use of combination of ppt and blackboard» (Very well)
9. Expectations from the teaching staffDid you have a clear idea of where you were going and what was expected from you in this course?12 svarande
No, definitely» | | 0 | | 0% |
No, to some extent» | | 1 | | 8% |
Yes, to some extent» | | 8 | | 66% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?12 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 8% |
Very well» | | 11 | | 91% |
Genomsnitt: 3.91 - Best course administration so far :)» (Very well)
11. TutorialsThe tutorials always started with a summary of the main key points of the corresponding chapters. How useful did you find those summaries or concept maps?12 svarande
Very much useless» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather useless» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather useful» | | 10 | | 83% |
Very much useful» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - Good from Augusto!» (Rather useful)
12. Group workHow did your group function in the group assignments (laboratory exercises and hometask)?12 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 8% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 58% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - some personal issues between group members affected the work. I think you should let students chose their group by themselves.» (Rather badly)
- I like it.» (Very well)
Study climate13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?12 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 16% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - » (Very good)
14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?12 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 41% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 50% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 15. How was the course workload?12 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 33% |
High» | | 4 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - It should be devided into two parts. It"s hard to understand and takes time to learn math.» (Too high)
16. How was the total workload this study period?12 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 8% |
Low» | | 1 | | 8% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 25% |
High» | | 5 | | 41% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5
Summarizing questions17. What is your general impression of the course?12 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 8% |
Good» | | 6 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 5 | | 41% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - very hard and tough.» (Good)
18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Hometask»
- Christophe»
- The project. Such things help to digest the knowledge.»
- take it easier, do it on 15p instead of 7.5p.»
- lecture notes»
- The home task, the professor.»
19. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Math»
- take it easier, do it on 15p instead of 7.5p.»
- Group selection.»
- I think that the expectations on how the lab report should be structured should be clearer. It is not easy for the student to know how the teacher wants the structure to be, since different teachers want it in different ways. It is no fun when you get a return on the lab report and you have to redo the entire structure of it, just because the requirements were not known a priori. It is better to get clear instructions from the beginning, it will save a lot of time, both for the student and the teacher.»
20. Additional comments- Leave us some time on math.»
21. RecommendationWould you recommend this course to other students?12 svarande
No, definitely» | | 0 | | 0% |
No, to some extent» | | 2 | | 16% |
Yes, to some extent» | | 7 | | 58% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.08 - It depends on the student interest. after all, the course is not easy.» (Yes, to some extent)
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|