Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Road engineering HT2010, VMT060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-02-01 - 2011-02-15
Antal svar: 23
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Emma Fritzell»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

23 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 8%
Around 20 hours/week»12 52%
Around 25 hours/week»6 26%
Around 30 hours/week»3 13%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.43

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 8%
50%»1 4%
75%»9 39%
100%»11 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 8%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»14 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»20 95%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.95

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

21 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 19%
Yes, definitely»17 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»1 4%
Large extent»13 59%
Great extent»6 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

- Although Gunnars teaching is a little nervous and slow he clearly explains tje concepts in an easily understandable way - i.e. you get the concepts» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»10 45%
Some extent»6 27%
Large extent»5 22%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.86

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 18%
Rather well»9 40%
Very well»9 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- The structure of the folders and handputs were rather confusing... hard to find the right stuff» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 27%
Very good»16 72%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- Gunnar is easy, approachable and informal and therefore very easy to ask and discuss with, if you get hold of him.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

22 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»5 22%
Very well»16 72%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

11. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 9%
Adequate»20 90%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The workload varied quite a lot during the course, from relatively high in the beginning to quite low in the end.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»14 63%
High»5 22%
Too high»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- The Infrastructure course took too much time.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor»2 9%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 22%
Good»12 54%
Excellent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Rather unclear what was relevant and there was no clear red thread: a straggling content. Also unclear of what was expected in the group projects.» (Poor)
- As always with one of Gunnars courses, at the end of the course you relize that you have learned quite a lot under quite comfortable conditions» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Learned a lot at the NCC-lab»
- Gunnar and the excercises»
- The exercise that NCC gave was good, I learned a lot from it.»
- the teacher try to help the student as much as he can.»
- study visits and the teacher»
- the assignments»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More information of what is expected and different structure of the group projects.»
- More excercises»
- the hand out should be writen in english rather than swedish.»
- some guest lectures»

16. Additional comments

- nope»

Kursutvärderingssystem från