Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

marterials selection and design 2010/2011, MMK221

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-25 - 2011-02-20
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 16%
Kontaktperson: Lars Nyborg»

1. Please provide your comments about the project?

- Good idea but very messy organization!»
- nice, got a good understadning of what i was supposed to learn»
- Was a good way to learn how to approach the usual problems with materials.»
- Interesting, let us practise what we learnt during the lessons»
- Some presentations was under acceptable level. that they actually passed is unbelievable. Otherwise good to get a way to apply the new knowledge. It would be nice to know the grade on it and just some notes about what was good and what could be done better for future projects. »
- It was a good activity to practice what we learned in the class»
- I liked the course as it gave me lots of information about material and how to select it as per design indent»
- It is interesting to learn the knowledge.»
- It was important to apply the course knowledge to a project studied. There where too many groups though, making it a bit tiresome to see them all in one day. Maybe some could be schedualed for a week before or something»
- Good»
- Good»
- Projektet gav en bra känsla för poängen med kursen och hur man tänker vid materialval men programvaran var svåranvänd. Dels för att vi inte fick någon handledning i det (t.ex. datorlabb) och dels för att det var otydligt hur programmet gjorde sina sorteringar.»
- Since so many factors was needed to be forseen it would have been better if we could be a bit more limited in what products to choose, then it would have felt a bit more "real"»
- Really good project.»
- redicoulus to be honest. Eighter you skip it or you raise the demands»
- The project was a nice possibility to learn how to use ces and the material selection process»
- Good project but a bit small for the amount of people in the group. Could have been more extensive or smaller groups.»

2. please provide your comments about contents and lectures?

- CRAP! Total crap! Especially the lectures with calculations guideing... why even bother to have a lecture about it!? When it didn"t differ from the word document on the course homepage... WHY!? So much waste of time! Would have been easier to put up a computer with microsoft Sam/Anna and some speakers... that would even been better! And when the lecturer did get a question... he just said "like this" "look at the board" "it is like this"... yeah I can see that... but I want to know WHY! But I did"t get an answer to that... no single time so I stoped asking question...»
- a bit comfusing at times, the project was a better way to understand the course»
- Only went to the first two lectures, there was too many things I already knew from previous courses. I studied the lecture slides on my own, that way I could skip the parts I knew and be more efficient.»
- Good and interesting, nevertheless, for people like me, who have a material engineering background, some thing are quite too much basic»
- A bit unorganized, too many pictures that was hard to follow. »
- Good»
- It was up to mark»
- It is good.»
- Interesting. Maybe explaining in simple terms the mechanical characteristics and the equations that relate them could be looked into more. Specifically the equation parts»
- Helpful, Attractive»
- It would have been a good idea to divide the lectures between theory lectures and lectures for solving example problems. »
- Jag var inte på så många föreläsningar men det kändes ändå som att det gick väldigt långsamt och som att det var mycket repetition. Det kändes helt enkelt som att kursen inte hade tillräckligt med innehåll för 7,5 hp.»
- I did not attend more than 4 lectures due to the fact that i did not feel that they gave me anything. Also showing the program that much of the course was about would be good. Also many of the things said felt a bit shallow and as it was said from "the book". If Teaching Design students the lecturer should spend some time on the terminology around usabillity, ergonomics and brand identity to seem a bit more trustworthy in this field. »
- Lectures could be run in a bit more comprehensive way. But the powerpoint presentation content is excellent.»
- only attended two.»
- sometimes a bit boring and too focused on how to run ces step by step. students arnt that stupid so it would be a way more interesting if more cases could be shown»
- Very good content, following the book very well.»

3. please provide your comments about course material and text book

- I guess it was ok»
- good, the book was accessable online, free :)»
- Good lecture slides, useful book (also good for the future). Some of the old exam questions and answers where confusing and not very clear.»
- Text book very good and complete ! Like a "bible" I think I will use it in the future, especially for basic reminders at the beginning of the book, the study cases... »
- THe book was good, the powerpoints on the webpage could be more organised. more put together that there was three different powerpoint files for one lecture made it a bit hard to follow. just to put them together to into one file, would make it a lot easier to print out and have with on the lecture. »
- Both lectures slide and book were so useful»
- Excellent material. Life time usefull»
- It is good.»
- Good, available and abordable.»
- Text book really good, slides nice and exercise very helpful»
- Text book wasn"t that useful. Inform at the start of the course that going to lectures+solving examples+study old tests is enough to learn the course.»
- Föreläsningarna kändes väldigt bundna till kursmaterialet och programmet på ett oflexibelt sätt. Det var egentligen inte fel på kursboken men jag tyckte inte att power pointsen (som verkade höra till programvaran och vara ett färdigt kurspaket) var särskilt bra. Det var svårt att förstå hur programmet fungerar genom att bara kolla på slides.»
- Totally satisfied»
- dont know, didn"t read.»
- Good book, but for studying for the exam I mainly used old exams uploaded on the course web page. »

Your own effort

4. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 44%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 11%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I had some knowledge from eralier courses» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I only regret we did not have any workshops or labs to use the software» (At most 15 hours/week)
- less than two, seroiusly.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- about enough» (Around 20 hours/week)

5. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»3 16%
50%»2 11%
75%»8 44%
100%»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I thought... or more or less hoped that some of the lectures should have had something of importance... but i was WRONG! Total waste of time! » (75%)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.77

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

6. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the level of the course is no problem. sometimes its not easy to find the "redpath"» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»4 22%
Some extent»9 50%
Large extent»4 22%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- NONE!» (Small extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»4 22%
Large extent»8 44%
Great extent»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- only the chosen example problems, the rest of the book wasn"t that useful» (Some extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»8 47%
Very well»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- IT DIDN"T!» (Very badly)
- I would preffer the project report to be handed in on the study portal... Or that you clearly reply by e-mail that you have received it.» (Rather well)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.75

Study climate & course

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»6 33%
Very good»8 44%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- They should have been good... or... was supposed to... We did get answers but they were of no use...» (Very poor)
- Only asked for help from the supervisor about how wide we should define scope of our project and how it would be graded. She refused to give any assistance at all. Very strange behaviour compared to other supervisors I"ve had. » (Rather poor)
- Too many students in the class !» (Rather good)
- Lars was no problem but the supervisor for the project was hard to get in touch with.» (Rather good)
- our assistant Kamelia had always time for us and was really good» (Very good)
- I alla fall när det gäller handledning för projektet.» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»6 33%
Very well»11 61%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- TO LARGE GROUPS! When you are six people with 8+ different schedules... THINK PLEASE! THINK!» (Very well)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»1 5%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»10 55%
High»5 27%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- My other course was very demanding.» (High)
- But i took 150%» (High)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Maybe the book and the PHD tutors»
- the project»
- The project»
- Project, courses, textbook»
- it is good to have projects so that we can apply the course»
- marerials»
- All of the things are good»
- the use of the program»
- Projektet.»
- keep the project but make it bigger and prefeably in smaler groups. Two students per group.»
- The project was a good source for learning but could be more extensive.»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- everything»
- not sure, the course was good»
- Make a ZIP-file of all the study material you post on the web. The folder structure is very good, but from our end we have to go inside each folder on the web interface. It would be super smashing great if we could download one file with the folder structure and files inside of it. Remember to book the exam date, some of us have to book tickets early to be able to got home for christmas.»
- ad labs to use the software»
- More organised. more info about what the project should contain, what the grade is based on. »
- Nothing»
- reduce the number of group presentations per day.»
- Föreläsningarna, och speciellt presentationsmaterialet. En datalabb för att gå igenom programvaran hade varit bra.»
- Exam might aswell be skipped. Focus on a good prject instead. Set up a expertpanel that could examine the projects and let the students get some real questions.»

15. The level of information presented in the course was:

18 svarande

too low»4 22%
reasonable»14 77%
too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- More info please! we did get any...» (too low)
- Maybe not enough detailed for material engineers» (reasonable)

16. Should the course cover fewer or more topics?

18 svarande

fewer»0 0%
reasonable»15 83%
more»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- but give deeper understanding» (reasonable)

17. Solved/worked problems helped training computational aspects:

17 svarande

disagree»1 5%
hesitant»2 11%
agree»14 82%

Genomsnitt: 2.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Organization of the course was transparent and caring

17 svarande

disagree»4 23%
hesitant»5 29%
agree»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 2.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Not sure who to send the report to.» (hesitant)

19. On the whole I would:

18 svarande

not recommend the course»5 27%
hesitant»2 11%
recommend the course»11 61%

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- to anyone!» (not recommend the course)
- It could be a really good course it is interesting. But as it is now I would not recommend it. » (hesitant)
- The central part - how to choose materials in a methodical way is extremely important, this is something I will have use for in the future. » (recommend the course)
- I am in the 2nd year of master and as a completion of my education, I really think it is a good course. It let me see many examples, and have a global vision of material engineering, seeing it in another point of view (I mean not microscopically speaking for instance) Thank you for this course » (recommend the course)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.55

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.67
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.58

Kursutvärderingssystem från