|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
marterials selection and design 2010/2011, MMK221Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-01-25 - 2011-02-20 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 16% Kontaktperson: Lars Nyborg»
1. Please provide your comments about the project?- Good idea but very messy organization!»- nice, got a good understadning of what i was supposed to learn» - Was a good way to learn how to approach the usual problems with materials.» - Interesting, let us practise what we learnt during the lessons» - Some presentations was under acceptable level. that they actually passed is unbelievable. Otherwise good to get a way to apply the new knowledge. It would be nice to know the grade on it and just some notes about what was good and what could be done better for future projects. » - It was a good activity to practice what we learned in the class» - I liked the course as it gave me lots of information about material and how to select it as per design indent» - It is interesting to learn the knowledge.» - It was important to apply the course knowledge to a project studied. There where too many groups though, making it a bit tiresome to see them all in one day. Maybe some could be schedualed for a week before or something» - Good» - Good» - Projektet gav en bra känsla för poängen med kursen och hur man tänker vid materialval men programvaran var svåranvänd. Dels för att vi inte fick någon handledning i det (t.ex. datorlabb) och dels för att det var otydligt hur programmet gjorde sina sorteringar.» - Since so many factors was needed to be forseen it would have been better if we could be a bit more limited in what products to choose, then it would have felt a bit more "real"» - Really good project.» - redicoulus to be honest. Eighter you skip it or you raise the demands» - The project was a nice possibility to learn how to use ces and the material selection process» - Good project but a bit small for the amount of people in the group. Could have been more extensive or smaller groups.» 2. please provide your comments about contents and lectures?- CRAP! Total crap! Especially the lectures with calculations guideing... why even bother to have a lecture about it!? When it didn"t differ from the word document on the course homepage... WHY!? So much waste of time! Would have been easier to put up a computer with microsoft Sam/Anna and some speakers... that would even been better! And when the lecturer did get a question... he just said "like this" "look at the board" "it is like this"... yeah I can see that... but I want to know WHY! But I did"t get an answer to that... no single time so I stoped asking question...»- a bit comfusing at times, the project was a better way to understand the course» - Only went to the first two lectures, there was too many things I already knew from previous courses. I studied the lecture slides on my own, that way I could skip the parts I knew and be more efficient.» - Good and interesting, nevertheless, for people like me, who have a material engineering background, some thing are quite too much basic» - A bit unorganized, too many pictures that was hard to follow. » - Good» - It was up to mark» - It is good.» - Interesting. Maybe explaining in simple terms the mechanical characteristics and the equations that relate them could be looked into more. Specifically the equation parts» - Helpful, Attractive» - It would have been a good idea to divide the lectures between theory lectures and lectures for solving example problems. » - Jag var inte på så många föreläsningar men det kändes ändå som att det gick väldigt långsamt och som att det var mycket repetition. Det kändes helt enkelt som att kursen inte hade tillräckligt med innehåll för 7,5 hp.» - I did not attend more than 4 lectures due to the fact that i did not feel that they gave me anything. Also showing the program that much of the course was about would be good. Also many of the things said felt a bit shallow and as it was said from "the book". If Teaching Design students the lecturer should spend some time on the terminology around usabillity, ergonomics and brand identity to seem a bit more trustworthy in this field. » - Lectures could be run in a bit more comprehensive way. But the powerpoint presentation content is excellent.» - only attended two.» - sometimes a bit boring and too focused on how to run ces step by step. students arnt that stupid so it would be a way more interesting if more cases could be shown» - Very good content, following the book very well.» 3. please provide your comments about course material and text book- I guess it was ok»- good, the book was accessable online, free :)» - Good lecture slides, useful book (also good for the future). Some of the old exam questions and answers where confusing and not very clear.» - Text book very good and complete ! Like a "bible" I think I will use it in the future, especially for basic reminders at the beginning of the book, the study cases... » - THe book was good, the powerpoints on the webpage could be more organised. more put together that there was three different powerpoint files for one lecture made it a bit hard to follow. just to put them together to into one file, would make it a lot easier to print out and have with on the lecture. » - Both lectures slide and book were so useful» - Excellent material. Life time usefull» - It is good.» - Good, available and abordable.» - Text book really good, slides nice and exercise very helpful» - Text book wasn"t that useful. Inform at the start of the course that going to lectures+solving examples+study old tests is enough to learn the course.» - Föreläsningarna kändes väldigt bundna till kursmaterialet och programmet på ett oflexibelt sätt. Det var egentligen inte fel på kursboken men jag tyckte inte att power pointsen (som verkade höra till programvaran och vara ett färdigt kurspaket) var särskilt bra. Det var svårt att förstå hur programmet fungerar genom att bara kolla på slides.» - Totally satisfied» - dont know, didn"t read.» - Good book, but for studying for the exam I mainly used old exams uploaded on the course web page. » Your own effort4. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I had some knowledge from eralier courses» (At most 15 hours/week) 5. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I thought... or more or less hoped that some of the lectures should have had something of importance... but i was WRONG! Total waste of time! » (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.6. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - the level of the course is no problem. sometimes its not easy to find the "redpath"» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - NONE!» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - only the chosen example problems, the rest of the book wasn"t that useful» (Some extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - IT DIDN"T!» (Very badly) Study climate & course10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - They should have been good... or... was supposed to...
We did get answers but they were of no use...» (Very poor) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - TO LARGE GROUPS! When you are six people with 8+ different schedules... THINK PLEASE! THINK!» (Very well) 12. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - My other course was very demanding.» (High) 13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Maybe the book and the PHD tutors»- the project» - The project» - Project, courses, textbook» - it is good to have projects so that we can apply the course» - marerials» - All of the things are good» - the use of the program» - Projektet.» - keep the project but make it bigger and prefeably in smaler groups. Two students per group.» - The project was a good source for learning but could be more extensive.» 14. What should definitely be changed to next year?- everything»- not sure, the course was good» - Make a ZIP-file of all the study material you post on the web. The folder structure is very good, but from our end we have to go inside each folder on the web interface. It would be super smashing great if we could download one file with the folder structure and files inside of it. Remember to book the exam date, some of us have to book tickets early to be able to got home for christmas.» - ad labs to use the software» - More organised. more info about what the project should contain, what the grade is based on. » - Nothing» - reduce the number of group presentations per day.» - Föreläsningarna, och speciellt presentationsmaterialet. En datalabb för att gå igenom programvaran hade varit bra.» - Exam might aswell be skipped. Focus on a good prject instead. Set up a expertpanel that could examine the projects and let the students get some real questions.» 15. The level of information presented in the course was:18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - More info please! we did get any...» (too low) 16. Should the course cover fewer or more topics?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - but give deeper understanding» (reasonable) 17. Solved/worked problems helped training computational aspects:17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 18. Organization of the course was transparent and caring17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Not sure who to send the report to.» (hesitant) 19. On the whole I would:18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - to anyone!» (not recommend the course) Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.58
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44%