Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation Industrial Engineering 2010, MTT050

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-25 - 2011-02-01
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Peter Almström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»10 71%
Around 25 hours/week»4 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 7%
75%»9 69%
100%»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- Because i was away a few days, otherwise i would have attended every lesson.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 57%
Yes, definitely»6 42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 35%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- higher practice on technical tools (like software) under the teacher supervision » (Some extent)
- Very good lessons and teacher» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»3 21%
Some extent»6 42%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

- The slides from the lectures was very good and was a nice help for my learning. But the book not so good because it was very detailed so i almost did not read it at all.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Except for the trouble with the AviX exercise...» (Very well)

9. Did the exam question hand-ins improve your learning?

- yes, a bit.»
- no, it doesn"t add anithing to what i learned during the lectures, but it"s a good way to allow the students to organize well their job»
- Yes.»
- Yes»
- Yes, to a certain extent»
- No»
- I think its quite helpfull since it "forces" you to study the weekly-topics again»
- Yes in some extent»
- Yes »

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 42%
Very good»7 50%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»6 42%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- it has worked very well among the swedish students in the group exercises, but NOT with the internationals!! They cant speak english enough and do not do the work they are supposed to do!!» (Rather well)
- I worked in a very good group, everybody participated in a good way. » (Very well)

12. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»13 92%
High»1 7%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

13. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»9 64%
High»3 21%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
Good»4 28%
Excellent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- Coming from a Z background it felt as if there was too much repetition. Also the subject wasn"t really within my field of interest. Time studies, that is.» (Fair)
- Very important course i think for us in the production master programme. it was also rather fun especially with the study vivits and exercises. I think some of the things in the course was repetitions from previous courses in the third year of automation and mechatronics programme, so i think that maybe more or some other things can be included in the course.» (Good)
- These things I"ve learnt is something I like to work with.» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the study visits and the excercises!»
- All the exercises and handins. »
- The teaching mode, including company visits, online resource, exercise,etc»
- The company visit of Volvo Cars»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- None»
- Some exam questions were quite tricky and hard.»
- Maybe less compulsory activities, Don"t really know. I would recommened that course.»

17. Additional comments

- Very good course. Hope it will get better and better»
- I don"t see the relevance of the exam question asking about the history of work studies etc. And the work sampling lecture example was not funny nor interesting in my opinion. Rather it felt as if 15 minutes of my life was stolen.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från