ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Concrete structures 2010, VBB048

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-24 - 2011-02-02
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41%
Kontaktperson: Björn Engström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time per week over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 9%
Around 25 hours/week»3 27%
Around 30 hours/week»6 54%
At least 35 hours/week»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- The course is not planned for 7,5p, its more like 15p because of the Fe project.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 9%
75%»3 27%
100%»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

- 90%» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

The student should be able to:
- describe and explain how forces are distributed and redistributed in statically indeterminate structures with regard to cracking, plastic deformations, time dependent deformations, prestressing and restraint..

12 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»6 50%
80-100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- The course is very descriptive and concept based. Instead of practical design, the course focuses more on the concept and the theory behind the response of structures to different factors.» (60-80%)
- I didn"t get maximum score in the exam. So apparently I lack some knowledge. » (60-80%)

4. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

The student should be able to
- describe and explain how second order moment in axially loaded slender elements is influenced by cracking, plastic deformations and time dependent deformations.

12 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 8%
60-80%»6 50%
80-100%»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- See comment above.» (60-80%)

5. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

The student should be able to:
- analyse the non-linear behaviour of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures by various approaches considering needed accuracy, load level and available information.

11 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»2 18%
60-80%»4 36%
80-100%»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

- See comment on question 3.» (60-80%)

6. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

The student should be able to:
- perform design work in project teams concerning continuous beams and columns, predict the resonse using non-linear FE-analysis and present the approach and results in written technical documentation.

12 svarande

0-20%»1 8%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 8%
60-80%»4 33%
80-100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- The course provided an opportunity to work on the software package Diana, which is one of the few powerful tools for the non-linear analysis of structures. » (60-80%)
- Not so good score in the project work. » (80-100%)

7. To what extent have you reached the follwoing goal?

The student should be able to:
- perform investigations in project teams concerning structural response using non-linear FE-analysis, interpret the results and present and discuss conclusions orally at a seminar.

12 svarande

0-20%»1 8%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 8%
60-80%»4 33%
80-100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- Succeeded in getting high score in te exam in the questions concerning FE-modelling.» (80-100%)

8. To what extent have your reached the following goal?

The student should be able to:
- critically review written technical documentation concerning investigations based on FE-analyis.

12 svarande

0-20%»1 8%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 8%
60-80%»5 41%
80-100%»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

9. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

The student should be able to:
- describe and explain how intrinsic deformation (shinkage and/or thermal strain) in restrained concrete elements results in stresses and cracking..

12 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 8%
60-80%»6 50%
80-100%»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

10. To what extent have you reached the following goal?

The student should be able to:
- analyse the risk of cracking and the cracking response in fundamental cases of restraint loading.

11 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»2 18%
60-80%»3 27%
80-100%»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

- Late in the course when the project took up much of the time. » (40-60%)

11. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»1 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 8%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 83%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

12. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 75%
No, the goals are set too high»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- The goals are reasonable but the way the course is planned for us to reach them is not reasonable! » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

13. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

The examination consists of "dugga", project work and final exam.

12 svarande

No, not at all»1 8%
To some extent»4 33%
Yes, definitely»7 58%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Dugga - very ood, exam - ok, project work - too much time and could be a lot more clear» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

14. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 16%
Large extent»6 50%
Great extent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Fe lectures - small extent» (Large extent)

15. To what extent has the FEM project been of helf for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»3 25%
Some extent»1 8%
Large extent»6 50%
Great extent»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- wasted a lot of time on doing easy but lengthy hand calculations, time that could have been used for reading and learning» (Small extent)
- In the section concerning FE-modelling. » (Great extent)

16. To what extent has the course literature and other course material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 8%
Large extent»6 50%
Great extent»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

17. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 16%
Rather well»3 25%
Very well»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Pingpong is better to use» (Rather badly)
- Why not hand everything out from the start? It should be up to us how we want to conduct our studies and it helps planning the work if all material is ready.» (Rather badly)
- The teacher responsible for the course is a knowledge power house and for the students, he is an authority in structural engineering. In my opinion, if the teacher in his lectures, keeps a slow pace and try to be more explicit by getting into the students" shoes, the students would be able to understand the subject more.» (Rather well)
- Hade varit bättre om möjligheten att köpa inbundna kompendier funnits» (Rather well)
- Lot of examples with good solutions. » (Very well)

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»8 66%
I did not seek help»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- It"s not always convenient to wait to the consultation. » (Rather good)
- could do more to make sure that it is clear what is asked for in the project.» (Rather good)
- But don´,t give us tasks which you are not able to solve!» (Very good)

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»2 16%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 41%
Very well»5 41%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

- Differnt kinds of experience and teammates who skip the course is rather frustrating» (Rather well)

20. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time is used for Concrete structures.

12 svarande

less than 20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
about 50%»3 25%
60-80%»5 41%
more than 80%»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

- I spended more like 90-95% of ´,my time on this coarse and that was not chosen, it was demanded because of the project work» (more than 80%)
- It was the only course I took the last period.» (more than 80%)

21. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 41%
High»4 33%
Too high»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- våret fem-projekt tog mycket tid pga komplikation.» (High)

Summarizing questions

22. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- Not concerning the project work which resulted in a too high work load and frustration the coarse is good and interesting but since the negative part took a large part of the course the general impression is not that good. Maybe this is why not that mny student take the coarse?» (Adequate)

23. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

11 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»0 0%
Rather high»7 63%
Very high»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Its a good coarse and it would be bad if it didn´,t remain but unfortunaty i would probably not be that positive if someone asked me if they should take the course or not. This is sad because the content would be great if you just decreased the needed time and adjusted it for 7,5p.» (Rather high)

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- It is a very well structured course. »
- In my opinion, the contents of the course are pretty optimum and do not require any review.»
- Dugga, lectures, exercises and literature is really good. The project work should be saved but decreased and use tasks which are more easy to solve»
- Project work.»
- Björn, the best teacher in the school. Dont change anything there.»
- Duggan, FEM-projektet»
- project work»
- The way the teachers activate students by letting us think about the problems before they are solved. »

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The project work! Decrease the demands and tasks!»
- The workload has to be lower!»
- If it"s possible to change the set-up of the education. Perhaps start more intensive to be able to repeat in the end instead of going through new parts. »
- The Fem project. It was too large. It stole time from both the rest of what course was teaching, aswell as the other courses at that time.»
- Bättre kontroll på hur uppgifterna i FEM-projektet går att lösa»
- try to shorten the study about cracks as its little bit difficult to understand»
- The afternoon PowerPoint lectures are very tiresome. Either put them in the morning or use the blackboard. »

26. Additional comments

- Great teaching and encouragement from the teachers. Thanks for the motivation. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från