Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Valuation and entrepreneurial financing (Chalmers CSE, GIBBS ), CIP041

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-24 - 2011-01-31
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 77%
Around 20 hours/week»1 11%
Around 25 hours/week»1 11%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- We had four courses simultaneously as well as the project as well as several other obligations. Should really 15 hours/week be the least option available in this evaluation?» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 22%
75%»3 33%
100%»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 44%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 14%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 71%
No, the goals are set too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2

- This course was on a very low level. I do not understand how it can be ranked as a masters course. The concepts that we discussed and some of the questions on the exam was high-school level. It causes problems. Its so slow, so it is not intresting to be on the lectures. It is very unmotivating. » (No, the goals are set too low)
- Passing the tests and making the all the assignments deserve a 4 and making the optional exercise deserves a 5. Having 4 and 5 for optional assignment does not seem fair.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 37%
Yes, definitely»3 37%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»3 33%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»2 22%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

- I think the teaching in this course was of terribly low level with poor English skill, poorly written exercises, poor preparations, poor pedagogics.» (Small extent)
- None.» (Small extent)
- Kaj is great but his English is not the best. I think something gets lost there.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- The literature was suitable for someone who has little previous experienced, which was good in my case!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 22%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Poor instructions with incredibly long times for replying emails etc. For one intermediate test we didn"t even know what area it was supposed to cover until the day before.» (Rather badly)
- Don"t take me wrong - Kaj is great. But the course is on the totally wrong level. Kaj is good at teaching the course, but I don¨,t think he would suit for teaching a course on masters level. » (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 11%
Rather good»3 33%
Very good»5 55%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- Long time to get email answers.» (Rather poor)
- There seemed to be an interest from the teacher to try to answer questions and help out, even though the English was very poor.» (Rather good)
- Kaj was there and he helped out more then he needed to. He was great. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 11%
Very well»8 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- Good good, we where able to invent ways to spend as little time as possible. » (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»1 11%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 77%
High»1 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- Once again, the course is ridiculous. I did not buy the book or study anything for the exams. I don"t understand why this course exist. » (Too low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»3 33%
High»2 22%
Too high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Work load has been pretty. » (Low)
- Too high from what I had expected, I thought more time would be available to work with the project.» (Too high)
- The project had to be less prioritized than school. The people spending most time did best, not the smartest ones.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»2 22%
Fair»3 33%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- One cannot justify such poor English, bad structure, inadequate communication and pedagogics at this level of education. We"re in the final year of a master that is supposed to be very good and we have struggled very hard to be here and have neglected alternatives on the way. I would recommend anyone NOT to take this course and instead study the literature on their own.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The game»
- The game should definitely be had again next year. If possible multiple times.»
- Nothing, change the course. If someone needs to understands these concepts they can take a course at handels. »
- The game (Big monopoly)»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The home exam was too extensive. 1/3 of the word requirements would be more than enough to communicate enough good answers»
- Passing the tests and making the all the assignments deserve a 4 and making the optional exercise deserves a 5. Having 4 and 5 for optional assignment does not seem fair.»
- Unfortunately I"d say that the teacher either has to make significant improvements language and communication-wise, otherwise he has to be changed.»
- Take away the course. Put something with a higher level there instead. Maybe take a masters-course from handels into the program?»
- Easier to contact teacher. Better english, the exchange student must have had a rough time understanding things.»
- The grading system. Having a huge assignment mostly based on theory and not practical issues to get a grade higher than 3 is not good.»

16. Additional comments

- This is the worst course I have had during my five years at Chalmers. Most other courses have been decent. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från