ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

New venture formation (TET GU Handels), CIP036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-21 - 2011-01-31
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 71%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 3 60%

100%» 2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 0 0%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 1 20%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 2 40%

Yes, definitely» 3 60%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent» 1 20%

Some extent» 1 20%

Large extent» 2 40%

Great extent» 1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

5. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 4 80%

Very well» 1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Study climate

6. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 1 20%

Very good» 4 80%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

7. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 100%

High» 0 0%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Lectures

8. Course introduction/Intellectual Assets and appropriation (Erik Hansson)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 1 20%

Good» 2 40%

Excellent» 2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

9. Title clearance and background foreground analysis/collaboration and external technology development (Andrew Telles)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 20%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 3 60%

Excellent» 1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

10. Becoming an employer (Maria Winckler, MAQS)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 2 40%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 3 60%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

11. Disclosure Sensitivity Analysis (Lars Andersson)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 2 40%

Excellent» 3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

12. Product Development Workshop (Pascal Le Masson, MINES ParisTech)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 4 80%

Good» 1 20%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

13. Branding and concept development (Toni-Matti Karjalainen, Aalto University)

4 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 2 50%

Excellent» 2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

14. Conceptual implementations of business models (Andrew Telles)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 20%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 3 60%

Excellent» 1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

15. Legal Due Diligence (Emma Olnäs Fors, Mannheimer Swartling)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 60%

Good» 2 40%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

16. Business due diligence (Erik Hedenryd, Volvo technology transfer)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 40%

Good» 3 60%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

17. Tessera tech (Erik Hansson)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 3 60%

Excellent» 2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

18. The firm as a nexus of contracts (Lars Andersson)

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 3 60%

Excellent» 2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 5 100%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- the course is great, however...the feedback are always short however concise. i"d like to have more detailed feedback along with some advices on how to tackle some legal obejct and matter.... still we are not laywers so we definitly lack something and always in need of advice.» (Good)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The literature and the contents were good enough and most part of it shall definitely be kept for the next year»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The overall goal and learning outcomes of the course could be made a little clearer and all the lectures shall be in accordance»

Kursutvärderingssystem från