Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Entrepreneurial leadership and dynamic organizing 1, CIP046
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2011-01-21 - 2011-01-31 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 57% Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»
Your own effort1. What amount of time did you spend on your own towards achieving the learning objectives of the course?This includes both preparation for class, completion of assignments and use of information/knowledge towards practical application. Please, if possible, specify the percentage of time used towards assignments/class preparation and the percentage of time used towards application in the comment section. 4 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 50% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 25% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 25% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - probably a 20/80 split (assignments/application)» (Around 20 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 4 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 2 | | 50% |
100%» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course learning objectives?4 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 25% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 50% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 4. Are the learning objectives relevant to the title of the course?4 svarande
Yes» | | 4 | | 100% |
No» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 5. Are the learning objectives relevant to the project work?4 svarande
Yes» | | 3 | | 75% |
No» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the learning objectives?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 50% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5
Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching, coaching, and/or feedback been of help for your learning?Please, if possible, specify which part of teaching, coaching or feedback has contributed to your learning and how in the comment section.4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.25 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?4 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 100% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?4 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 75% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?3 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 66% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 12. How was the course workload?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 100% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 13. How was the total workload of the period, taking into account the objective of combined education and venture creation?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 75% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 14. How did the workload of the period relate to your expectations at the beginning of the period?- There were no surprises. The workload we were told to expect is what was delivered.»
- Well it was a lot higher than what I was expecting.»
Summarizing questions15. Was the course helpful in preparing you for acting entrepreneurially?4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 3 | | 75% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The Lab Report»
17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The PEP guy for time wasters and the like. He was an ass, disengaging, monotonous, and overall one of the worst persons I have had to sit through a lecture with. Furthermore, have a look at an article by Kotter "What effective general managers really do." Provides an interesting take on leadership.»
- it could be worth while to devide the lab report into several smaller peridical assignments.»
- Relation between the delivered lectures and the learning outcomes should be formulated better.»
18. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|