Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

CCR 2010-2011, TEK 140

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-18 - 2011-02-02
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Anna Kadefors»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your background

1. Which is your earlier educational background?

26 svarande

Swedish: Chalmers Civil Engineering (VoV)»9 34%
Swedish: Chalmers Högskoleingenjör»6 23%
Swedish: other university»4 15%
Foreign»7 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.34

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

26 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 26%
Around 20 hours/week»10 38%
Around 25 hours/week»8 30%
Around 30 hours/week»1 3%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- Väldigt svårt att uppskatta, men jag skulle tro mellan 15 och 20 timmar men det fanns inte som alternativ så jag tog det närmaste.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- Varies from time to time» (Around 25 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 3%
75%»7 26%
100%»18 69%

Genomsnitt: 4.65

4. If you attended less than 75% of the teaching, please indicate the main reasons (several alternatives are possible)

- studies business and administration as well»

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

5. Are the course goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

26 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»24 92%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

26 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 26%
Yes, definitely»17 65%
I have not been examined yet»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 3%
Large extent»20 76%
Great extent»5 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

8. What is your opinion of the lectures by Jan Bröchner?

- Ibland utsvävande»
- In general, his lectures are very useful except the last one where he was quite rush»
- I think the lectures were good but somehow I found difficulties in listening to him. It"s because I have not adapted to the internaltional environment yet but to some extent, it also because of his accent. »
- generally good»
- Fun and informative.»
- Very good and he really makes the lectures interesting!»
- very interesting, students can feel that teacher is very dedicated»
- Bra på att entusiasmera och intressant att lyssna på. Det blev lite väl mycket historielektion ibland med mycket prat om gamla gubbar och byggnader och kanaler.»
- A little bit heavy and hard to understand, but generally good»
- Fun slides and lectures although the slides could contain more information, i.e be more helpful before the exam»
- his lectures were a little confusing because they were very skimmed.»
- Seems blurred and needs to be organized better. With better elaborations. I think Jan has an expectation from his students to know something in advance, which may not be the case mostly. »
- Jan is interesting to listen to- you soon realize that he has a great passion for his subject! »
- Bra och lärorika fast lite röriga och ofta för utsvävande»
- Inspiring and fun»
- very entertaining which made it easier to remember what he was talking about»
- good. clear and easy to follow»
- Very good »
- Good slides, but these lecture was a bit difficult to follow and understand. need perhaps more time to explain the parts better.»
- Bra lektioner som berörde relevanta ämnen för kursen.»
- Very good»
- Intresting»
- To many slides with little information. If you read the slides before the exam it is kind of hard to remember what the slides mean. »
- THe lectures were very good and interesting.»

9. What is your opinion of the lectures by Anna Kadefors?

- BRA! »
- They are interesting»
- I had no difficulties in understanding the lectures.»
- generally good»
- Informative and good lectures.»
- Good.»
- interesting, the guest lectures organized by Anna were interesting too»
- Kändes alltid väldigt proffsigt och det märks att hon vet vad hon pratar om.»
- Good and satisfying»
- Good slides and teaching in general!»
- her lectures were very clear and had good structure and they were proper for the time that were done in.»
- Great»
- Same for Anna as for Jan- very interesting to listen to- also with a passion fot the subject.»
- Bra och lättförståeliga!»
- Less inspiring but more to the point»
- they were easy to understand and Anna had good answers to questions answerd»
- very good. clear and easy to follow.»
- very good»
- Good, good slides and easy to follow during the lectures. »
- Bra lektioner som berörde relevanta ämnen för kursen.»
- very good»
- Intresting as well»
- Good structure and slides. »
- The lectures were very good.»

10. What is your opinion about the construction law lecture by Robert Jukic-Karlsson at Mannheimer Swartling?

- Kul med ny miljö, inspirerande »
- Good!»
- Provided useful information but too much on Swedish law made me confused.»
- ok, difficult to follow sometimes»
- Very good!»
- Was a good lecture but i did"t understad what it was about until some time afterwards.»
- interesting, gave an insight on how law firms are connected to construction industry»
- Kul att komma någon annanstans än Chalmers. Föreläsningen i sig var bra innehållsmässigt men den låg lite för tidigt i kursen för jag förstod inte särskilt mycket förrän några veckor senare.»
- A little bit early to attend, the lecture was not that useful»
- Informative and well connected with practice»
- It was not so useful for me,»
- Great»
- Good to get the basics from a person who works with these issues in his daily work. Very fun to visit the Manheimer Swartling office!»
- Bra och intressant!»
- Could have been a bit more detailed on the specifics about what AB04 contains»
- I did not attend since i at the moment was out of the counrty»
- very good»
- Good»
- Mycket bra och intressant att få juristernas perspektiv.»
- didnt attend»
- all this guest lectures are a very good contribution to the course»
- A good overview picture.»
- It was really a good lecture and covered almost all the aspects of the contracts. It was the best lecture in the whole course i guess.»

11. What is your opinion of the construction law in practice lecture by Robert Deli from Wallenstam?

- Kul med gästföreläsning, inspirerande »
- Great!»
- Provided useful information but too much on Swedish law made me confused.»
- very good»
- Very good!»
- Really good with tips from the reality! Interesting!»
- usefull, interesting»
- Föreläsningen i sig var bra innehållsmässigt men den låg lite för tidigt i kursen för jag förstod inte särskilt mycket förrän några veckor senare.»
- Good»
- Informative and well connected with practice»
- It was very good and practical»
- Great»
- Maybe a bit thin? (The content I mean..)»
- Också mycket bra»
- Very good and easy to learn from»
- Interesting»
- Very good, should defininetly come back nest year»
- Good»
- Good»
- Mycket bra och intressant att få juristernas perspektiv.»
- very good»
- see question above»
- Very good! You get a really good picture of arbitration and civil court!»
- It was very good aswell.»

12. What is your opinion of the lectures by Jeanette Andersson (general contract law)?

- A little bit slow but she gave very useful information. Overall, the lectures are well-presented»
- I had no difficulties in understanding the lectures.»
- very good»
- She could have kept a higher pase but also a good lecturer.»
- Easy to understand and intresting an especially good because you can use everything she said in the reality!»
- very usefull»
- Väldigt krångligt ämne och jag tycker inte föreläsningen täckte tentafrågan.»
- Very good»
- missed the first but the second was good! very nice ppts with good information and she also stated clearly what was expected from the students.»
- They were very useful and clear. »
- Very perfect. I liked that one.»
- Interesting, but it would be good to be able to print out the slides beforehand- easier to keep up with what she was saying.»
- Pedagogisk och bra»
- Also very good lecturer with good setup of exercises and examples»
- Made you want to learn even more»
- very good, usefull for later on»
- Good»
- The best lecture!»
- Really good. it was interesting and relevant for the course.»
- Bra men kunde ha lagt nivån högre. Var näst intill övertydlig ibland.»
- did not attend but heard it was good!»
- informative but not so easy to adopt»
- Very good! two really good lectures. Keep it for next year :)»
- They were good.»

13. What is your opinion of the lectures on Negotiations (by Henrik Kristensen)?

- MKT. BRA Intressant och inspirerande »
- That is funny. I enjoy very much the game. This kind of lecture should be done more ♥, »
- I had no difficulties in understanding the lectures.»
- very good and interesting»
- VERY GOOD!!!! Extremely interesting! If there is some lecture you shouldnt miss this is these are the ones!»
- Very interesting topic and a very good lectures!»
- good teacher, interesting lectures»
- Utan tvekan två av de mest intressanta föreläsningar jag någonsin varit på. Kändes väldigt användbart.»
- Good»
- Fun, interesting and very helpful for our future I think.»
- Tey were very useful and practical not only in Professional life but also in the other aspect of life. »
- Very perfect. I liked that one too.»
- Rolig och intressant»
- Overall good examples and exercises»
- good and interesting»
- very good»
- very good and the excersises in class did help understanding negotiations better»
- Bra föreläsningar som fick mig att tänka till.»
- so-so»
- Intresting even for the private life»
- Good! But the exam questions should be more extensive, not just "what is the benefits of contending". I think that type of question is to specific»
- Extremely good lecture.»

14. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»8 30%
Some extent»6 23%
Large extent»11 42%
Great extent»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.19

- Did not you the book at all!» (Small extent)
- I did not have it» (Small extent)
- some parts were difficult to understand» (Some extent)
- mainly slides and lectures» (Large extent)

15. What is your opinion of the course book by Potts: Construction Cost Management

- I never read it»
- A very useful book. However, I did not used that book much to study for the written exam.»
- did not read all, not so good»
- Didnt really use the book. I used the lectures instead.»
- Okey book, a bit slow to read and some parts are interesting and some not.»
- Could have done everything needed without this book, this book is not really necessary, in my opinion.»
- Lättläst men man vet inte alltid vad som är relevant.»
- Didnt check it much to be honest.»
- It is a good and easy book for understanding the meaning of the contract"s aspects»
- Very good. If read thoroughly»
- I think it was good!»
- Ganska bra men läste inte så mycket»
- Did not read it»
- Interesting but not to relevant»
- Unneccessary to buy Potts book»
- some parts were difficult to understand»
- Använde nästan inte boken något.»
- Not so good»
- I did not have it»
- Quite useful»

16. What is your opinion of the documents on a European Civil Code for Service Contracts?

- I never read it»
- provided a broad and internaltional perspective in comparison with many literature and lectures about Swedish construction law. »
- did not read them»
- Good.»
- Okey but could be improved.»
- I did not read them.»
- Tråkiga, förstod ingenting.»
- Didnt check it»
- A bit more that what has been dealt with in lectures»
- I have no opinion»
- good »
- Användbara och tydliga.»
- Not so good»
- I did not use it»
- Nil»

17. What is your opinion of the scientific articles?

- OK»
- they are a lot better than those mentioned above, but students need to be guided before read them»
- I haven"t read it yet»
- good»
- Very good! I prefer to have articles instead of a book which usually conatins a lot of information that is not relevant.»
- Ok.»
- I dont thin they were really usefull. Too theoretical, hard to use in real life practice.»
- Bra överlag, de flesta kändes relevanta även om man fick skumma igenom en del tunga stycken.»
- Some of those where interesting and helpful in learning better english, but sometimes rather hard to grasp and understand the wholeness of some articles because they are quite considerable.»
- fairly useful»
- Great!»
- Tror inte jag läste så jättemycket»
- No opinion»
- easy to read»
- good»
- Bra.»
- inspiering»
- Good»
- I read those conserning my two page rapport, and those were good!»
- Were alright but not so interesting»

18. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

26 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 3%
Rather well»11 42%
Very well»14 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Nothing negative about the people that uploaded or what was uploaded but the studentportal didnt work tht good.» (Rather badly)
- The lectureres gave us the prints of their powerpoints at the start of the lecture, I think That was very useful.» (Rather well)

Group assignment

19. What is your opinion of the group assignment in general (usefulness, topics...)

- Bra omfattning »
- I dont like the way we assigned the topics»
- Useful and gave me a chance to work with different perspective and experiences. Besides, it helped me understand a more practical knowledge in construction contract relationship»
- did not know what was expected, a bit loose but learned from it»
- Rather small paper so the learning from it is rather small. But when listening to all other presentations you get a overview of a lot of topics.»
- Interesting and good assignment. Good size on the assignment.Good to work in small groups, give deeper understanding.»
- good idea, but they could have been bigger, could have listened to all the other groups presentations, not only half.»
- Det fanns en del otydlighet. Inte i uppgiften i sig men på feedbackmötet fick vi reda på att vårt ämne inte alls handlade om det vi trodde. Och jag är säker på att 99 % av alla männsikor hade tolkat det som vi gjorde men vår handledare tillhörde den sista procenten så vi fick tänka om. I stort är ändå uppgiften ett bra sätt att lite djupare sätta sig in i ett ämne som berörs i kursen.»
- Not bad»
- Interesting topics and well thought out group work I think. Good to learn to limit the information to 2 pages text. Mainly because one must focus on the most important and also because it"s easier to get familiar with other groups papers.»
- It was usefull. »
- That is the best way to learn. Good job»
- Quite fussy subject- maybe an extra tutoring would be nice?»
- Bra uppgift och inte så tidskrävande, den hade kunnat vara mer omfattande»
- Not that hard assignment, but a little harder to understand everything from the other groups results»
- Topics were great and gave us more insight in the business related issues. Also assigments size was perfect and didn´,t disturbe other work that had to be done»
- interesting. Should be included next year. A good way to adapt the theory that was read into real scenarios.»
- Very good! Good that it is short (2 pages), so you really learn!»
- in order to understand the course better a group assignment helps it to get a greater understanding regarding ccr»
- Bra sätt att lära sig i kombination med tentamen.»
- usefull, and good with the presentation to hear the other topics...»
- Good contribution to the course.»
- Usefull! You got insight in a specific area, and it were perfect lenght»
- Very good. The best thing about it was that you can come up with your own topics to work on according to your own interest.»

20. What is your opinion on the supervision, grading and feedback?

25 svarande

Good»15 60%
Neutral»9 36%
Bad»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.44

- good» (Good)
- Se fråga 19» (Neutral)
- The people that wrote the questions were not there when we wanted to appeal, this is not ok!» (Bad)

Study visits

21. Did the study visit enhance your understanding of the course subject?

26 svarande

To a great extent»7 26%
To a large extent»10 38%
To some extent»6 23%
To a small extent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.19

- always good to have study visits» (To a large extent)

22. What is your opinion of the study visit groupwork and workshop?

- Intresant»
- Kinda uninteresting»
- Good, helpful and well-organized»
- very good, understood it better when we discussed it among ourselves»
- Good»
- ok.»
- Bra att diskutera med de andra grupperna och se skillnader/likheter.»
- Interesting»
- Good to discuss the study object which one didn"t attend.»
- they are very useful and well arranged.»
- very important. But what is students are allowed to ask their own questions?»
- Study visits was excellent! Interesting to here/see examples from real life, and how it is perhaps not always the same as prescibed in the books.»
- Bra»
- I was ill during the workshop. The study visit did not bring all that much new since I had been there before»
- They are neccesary to give more understanding to subjects studied»
- good to have groupwork and workshop»
- Bra att få höra om flera olika projekt och kunna jämföra.»
- Very inspireing to meet the real industry»
- It was arranged in a good way.»

Study climate

23. How was the course workload?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»23 88%
High»2 7%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

- It was ok if the load of other courses did not add to it.» (High)

24. How was the total workload this study period?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»5 19%
High»12 46%
Too high»8 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.03

- Vissa andra kurser var hemskt obalanserade och tunga.» (High)
- High due to MOCI assignment.» (High)
- MOCI = Too high» (Too high)
- Was because of the managing organization in the construction industry.» (Too high)
- The MOCI course...» (Too high)
- MOCI course too big!» (Too high)
- cut the moci!» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

25. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 3%
Good»16 61%
Excellent»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- more than good but not excellent» (Good)
- Väldigt välskött kurs, känns som lärarna bryr sig och lägger ner mycket tid och det märks verkligen är alltid uppskattat.» (Good)
- Very nice to get some insights on the subject and everything related to law and contracts.» (Good)
- A very good and useful course!» (Good)
- Between good and exxellent. it is a really good course!!!» (Good)
- En bra kurs som alla V-ingenjörer borde läsa. Kanske skulle finnas i grundutbildningen och vara på svenska så tror jag man hade fått mer nytta av den. » (Excellent)
- interesting and good for the future» (Excellent)

26. What should definitely be preserved next year?

- det finns så mycket annat att förbättra (ex. andra kurser) innan denna bör ändras, en mkt. bra kurs»
- Lectures by Henrik »
- Study visit and work group»
- the guest lecturers and the study visits, it was a good variation and kept it interesting»
- The guest lectures and the study visits!!!!»
- Jan and his lectures.»
- guest lectures, study trips»
- Studiebesöket. Det blev även som en social sak.»
- The written assignment and the excellent teachers, Jan, Anna and Henrik mainly.»
- Study visit, lecturers, »
- The Guest Lecturers»
- Study visits and the visits to manheimer Swartling»
- The guest lecturers»
- Study visits»
- Study visits»
- Group works and study visits»
- Contract law!»
- All of the things as it.»

27. What should definitely be changed next year?

- keep »
- Group Assignment»
- I have no ideas»
- reading material? (not definetly, can"t think of something..)»
- Take away the book and replace with relevant research articles»
- Can not think of anything right now.»
- assignment could have been bigger»
- Att flytta fram föreläsningarna med Robert och Robert. Kanske de kan byta plats med Jeanettes föreläsningar.»
- preperation before study visit should perhaps be changed since pretty much no one did it - maybe assign time for it to be done and/or just give the students reading material beforehand which will help to form questions instead of preparing questions based on less information.»
- more concern has to be given for Risk Management and Facilities management and also supply chain lectures »
- More tutoring oppertunities with the group project»
- The group assignments»
- Strunta i Potts-boken.»
- Nothing directly»
- Me personally did not get anything at all from the studie visits. Maby find another format, i dont know.»
- Nothing.»

28. Do you think that the course should be moved to the first study period?

24 svarande

Yes»7 29%
No»17 70%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- dosent matter» (?)
- I would rather prefer if detailed project is given for students in connection with CCR rather than MOCI. That would help in two ways» (Yes)
- (No)
- Det är en del termer vi fått lära tidigare som känns nödvändiga att kunna på förhand.» (No)
- Big no no. It was good the way it was scheduled.» (No)

29. Additional comments

- Thank you for giving us (students) much useful knowledge »
- Thanks»
- None»
- Try to communicate with Göran to see what topics he will raise in his course Construction Governance..»
- Best course of the first half year»
- gött jobbat Jan & Anna!»
- Interesting course»

Kursutvärderingssystem från