ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Turbulent flow, MTF256

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-14 - 2011-03-28
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 90%
Kontaktperson: Lars Davidson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 33%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»3 16%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 22%
100%»12 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals, i.e. the learning outcomes?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»18 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»18 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 33%
Yes, definitely»9 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching in Part 1 been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»12 66%
Great extent»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Lada is one of the most pedagogical teachers on Chalmers! Repetition and good examples!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the teaching in Part 2 been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»7 43%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.43

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material in Part 1 been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»10 55%
Great extent»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material in Part 2 been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»4 25%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»6 37%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 50%
Very well»9 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Felt that the webpage was a bit primitive, but maybe were spoiled.» (Rather well)

11. To what extent has the Assignment been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»9 50%
Great extent»9 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Very good for understanding!» (Great extent)

12. What was good with the Assignment? Anything you would like to change?

- It was good »
- I would like a bit more information in the begining because I felt quite lost. But at the end the questions felt very clear. The person responsible for the assignment, teacher, should be clearer on the emphasis on the way the report looks and the way the answers are presented and also the importance of the language.»
- Good training in understanding the different terms.»
- You are forced to play with the data and you can clearly see that the equations works! I like that!»
- Yes it is good. It represent the course very well.»
- The assignment help me a lot for deeply understading the courses. More well arranged assignment can be better.»
- The do something fun is a good part to see if students can go further and try something by their own.»

13. To what extent has the lab been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»3 17%
Some extent»7 41%
Large extent»7 41%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- the lab felt almost unnessesary, although to get to see the wind tunnel and learn some about it was intresting but the assignment itself gave absolutely nothing.» (Small extent)
- the lab itself did not help to much (the calculation part). but gunnars introduction and explanation of the wind tunnel and the phenomenon was good!» (Small extent)
- It got a bit confusing but I understand that the time was used to something else in the course so it wasw good that you cut some parts of the lab» (Some extent)

14. What was good with the lab? Anything you would like to change?

- It was a good lab»
- The good thing about the lab was the illustrations althoug the smoke was a bit of an annoying thing, maybe considering doing the smoke in a enclosing environment. The acual "lab" felt completely unnessesary other then get to see how a person sits in a chair and pushes a button. I would remove the teacher that felt more as a nessesary thing than of importance and try to analyse what it is we want the students to learn. »
- Good to have a practical part of the course. This part could be even larger to enlight more examples of turbulent flow situations.»
- I think, lab part was more like a quick tour. If it is going to be part of the course, I would rather to have it more extended.»
- It"s better to be in part of the experiment not just as an audience and latter gather the data and calculate them. »
- the lab itself did not help to much (the calculation part). but gunnars introduction and explanation of the wind tunnel and the phenomenon was good!»
- I suggest that the lab (part2) should be more organized and planed with clear goals.»
- Not really interesting unfortunately due to only few labs»

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 11%
Very good»15 88%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 17%
Very well»7 41%
I did not seek cooperation»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Didn"t work with anybody on the assignment and for the lab we were too many in the group so the work felt more a big mess but thats partially due to the time. we didn"t have time to organize anything.» (Very poorly)
- New situation for me to not have any one I knew since before in the course» (Rather well)

17. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»12 70%
High»4 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- Perfect» (Adequate)

18. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»8 57%
High»2 14%
Too high»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- But I took many other courses » (Too high)
- I read CFD also and it was quite much to do. But a good thing was that the deadline of the assignment was some time before the exams. Which gave time to study. » (Too high)
- Rigid body dynamics-project was insanely underestimated in time by Per-åke» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»9 52%
Excellent»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.47

- I leart a lot during the lecture of the course(part1). It was really useful.» (Good)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The material for part 1 »
- Almost all.»
- The weekly learning outcome»
- Data-assignment»
- Lectures are good :). First part for instance»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More structure in part 2 »
- Gunnar"s part of the course needs a major cleaning up.»
- More studies of applied turbulent flows to illustrate the meaning of the different terms in the equations. Show and explain practical examples along with the theroetical parts.»
- The lab. Involve the student in setting the experimental environment. »
- The lab part(part2) should be organize better with good referrences.»
- Maybe more labs will be more interesting, especially on the assignment which was i think useless and not helpful.»

22. Additional comments

- Overall really good course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från