Visa resultat

ICT Economics and Policy 2010/2011 SP 2, TEK320

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

22 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		3		13%
Around 20 hours/week»		6		27%
Around 25 hours/week»		8		36%
Around 30 hours/week»		4		18%
At least 35 hours/week»		1		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		1		4%
50%»		3		13%
75%»		8		36%
100%»		10		45%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- One lecture was misssed I prepared assignment» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		1		4%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		11		50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		10		45%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		20		95%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- It was the combinations of more economics and less communication. For pure engineering student some how difficult. » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		8		38%
Yes, definitely»		12		57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		1		4%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Examination: Project and take home exam

6. How long time did you spend on the take home exam?*

Less than 10 hours»		1		4%
10-20 hours»		4		18%
20-30 hours»		7		31%
30-40 hours»		7		31%
More than 40 hours»		3		13%

Genomsnitt: 3.31 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- For policiy and economics point of view took more time. Because I am from enginnering background» (30-40 hours)

7. How long time did you spend on the project*

Less than 10 hours»		0		0%
10-20 hours»		3		13%
20-30 hours»		9		40%
30-40 hours»		4		18%
More than 40 hours»		6		27%

Genomsnitt: 3.59 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. What grade would you give the take-home exam as a means to learning*

Very bad»		0		0%
Bad»		0		0%
Average»		6		27%
Good»		10		45%
Very good»		6		27%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was quite interesting and enjoyable to write this exam!.» (Very good)

9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?*

Very bad»		0		0%
Bad»		0		0%
Average»		8		36%
Good»		9		40%
Very good»		5		22%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- This project was quite useful for understanding better what we learnt during lectures and readings. It helped me to better relate concepts from the literature with real life cases.» (Very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.69

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		4%
Some extent»		6		27%
Large extent»		11		50%
Great extent»		4		18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- One recomendation is that some technical terms like switching cost and related terms should be explain clearly. Some other topics like broadband services etc not clearly support the lecture slides,should be in more detail. I think teacher must have clear understanding about telecome systems and their applications, services and their working in technical and ecnomical/financial aspects. A non technical teacher can"t explain well to technical terms and application and services. » (Large extent)
- He has been one of the best teachers I had during my master (MEI). It was evident how much he knew about every topic. Furthermore he was always flexible and available when we had any doubt regarding any topic.» (Great extent)

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		2		9%
Some extent»		1		4%
Large extent»		12		54%
Great extent»		7		31%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- The selection of papers was very good. All of them provide definitions and examples of every topic.» (Great extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		1		4%
Rather well»		9		40%
Very well»		12		54%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		7		31%
Very good»		15		68%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Great!!! I always received help and answer to my questions when needed.» (Very good)

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		1		4%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		10		45%
Very well»		11		50%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

15. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		20		90%
High»		2		9%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

16. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		16		72%
High»		3		13%
Too high»		3		13%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		1		4%
Adequate»		8		36%
Good»		9		40%
Excellent»		4		18%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- This course was one of my favorites!!!. » (Adequate)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

20. Additional comments

* obligatoriska frågor