ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Simulation of Production Systems 2010, MPR271

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-12 - 2011-01-24
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Björn Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

26 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 3%
Around 20 hours/week»5 19%
Around 25 hours/week»8 30%
Around 30 hours/week»11 42%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- Weekend I used to stretch a lot to do the simulation. Its good that I have learnt this software by self learning.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»3 11%
75%»12 46%
100%»11 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Only missed one guest lecture and one normal lecture, so more than 75%» (75%)
- One class was scheduled during Zmart. Henceforth, pl. see to that no class is scheduled on Job fair day. I have totally missed two lectures.» (75%)
- Some lectures were simply too... much ol" low level stuff» (75%)
- Actually I have missed one class, so it is in fact not 100%, but it is quite close to that.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

26 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»16 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

25 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»25 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I havenot such a background, but the goals are reasonable because of the nature of the programme we are studying.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

25 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»12 48%
Yes, definitely»12 48%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 26%
Large extent»16 61%
Great extent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- Assistance was limited during the programming phase of the project due to different programming styles, but this is to be expected so there is no problem.» (Some extent)
- Professor just gave outline outline to all important topics and its up to students to grasp and take it forward and develop of their own. Overall I enjoyed the course. » (Large extent)
- The teaching has been focusing on the students and all lectures has been easy to follow and a summary with details of whats expected from the student has been presented, which all of us has feelt. That I think has pushed us to work more and to have a higher motivation of working with the course. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent were you satisfied with lectures given by the following lecturers?

Grade your answer in a scale from Excellent (5) to Poor (1) for each lecturer.

Matrisfråga

- Gosh! Am I supposed to remember who is who?»
- I liked the direct support that lectures gave to making simulation excercises. Many case examples given in the lectures were on the other hand very nice to have in order to see how simulation can be used, but on the other hand sometimes it felt like not-informative, not-educating. Meaning that it was nice to see the model, but that time could have been spent more wisely. »
- Every teacher has done a good job. And i believe that Anders and Björn has done a great work with the lectures and it"s "red line". »
- I wish I knew everybody"s names...»

Björn Johansson
25 svarande

Excellent (5)»15 60%
Very Good (4)»10 40%
Fair (3)»0 0%
Weak (2)»0 0%
Poor (1)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

Anders Skoogh
25 svarande

Excellent (5)»16 64%
Very Good (4)»9 36%
Fair (3)»0 0%
Weak (2)»0 0%
Poor (1)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.36

Tommy Fässberg
21 svarande

Excellent (5)»9 42%
Very Good (4)»8 38%
Fair (3)»3 14%
Weak (2)»1 4%
Poor (1)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

Torbjörn Claesson
19 svarande

Excellent (5)»3 15%
Very Good (4)»10 52%
Fair (3)»5 26%
Weak (2)»1 5%
Poor (1)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

Bertil Gustafsson
22 svarande

Excellent (5)»1 4%
Very Good (4)»13 59%
Fair (3)»4 18%
Weak (2)»2 9%
Poor (1)»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.59

Jonas Laring
18 svarande

Excellent (5)»2 11%
Very Good (4)»12 66%
Fair (3)»4 22%
Weak (2)»0 0%
Poor (1)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

Rolf Berlin
17 svarande

Excellent (5)»1 5%
Very Good (4)»11 64%
Fair (3)»4 23%
Weak (2)»1 5%
Poor (1)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

Hans Sjöberg
18 svarande

Excellent (5)»1 5%
Very Good (4)»11 61%
Fair (3)»6 33%
Weak (2)»0 0%
Poor (1)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

Niels Glamheden (ÅF)
20 svarande

Excellent (5)»2 10%
Very Good (4)»9 45%
Fair (3)»7 35%
Weak (2)»1 5%
Poor (1)»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»3 11%
Some extent»5 19%
Large extent»13 50%
Great extent»5 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Good GSWA» (Some extent)
- Good lecture slides. » (Large extent)
- clear and well-structured powerpoint slides. Sometimes better headlines helpfull.» (Great extent)
- Especially GSWA was our guide throughout the course.» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

26 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 7%
Rather well»12 46%
Very well»12 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Slides often uploaded too late.» (Rather badly)

10. What is your opinion on the project?

26 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Acceptable»2 7%
Quite good»12 46%
Excellent»12 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Doesn"t make sense for me to program with 2 persons at one computer.» (Acceptable)
- A good way to learn this type of course» (Excellent)
- very good, but my opinion would be-project is more tougher considering the study(course duration)period of 2 months.» (Excellent)
- it was great fun to do.» (Excellent)
- I believe the project was a huge part of the learning. Both in simulation and in teamwork and in a project as total. » (Excellent)

11. How much did you learn from the project?

On a scale where 1 = not much and 5 = very much

26 svarande

1»1 3%
2»0 0%
3»1 3%
4»11 42%
5»13 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.34 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

12. Do you agree that project work is a good teaching method in this course?

26 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 7%
Significant extent»24 92%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- If everybody can deliver a project and if there"re more milestones in the project. (quality gates to avoid searching for mistakes, when code is finished)» (Significant extent)
- It would be hard to make an exam in this course.» (Significant extent)

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help during project work?

26 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 7%
Rather good»10 38%
Very good»14 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- long queues: After a change of the code in 20sec, waiting time for the supervisor sometimes 20minutes.» (Rather poor)
- Depends on the question and who you ask.» (Rather poor)
- Ibland var inte handläggarna bra på att svara! De orkade inte hitta felet typ! Men överlag var det kanon med hjälp. » (Rather good)
- But it was a bit tricky sometimes when different teachers helped you with the programming. Everybody has a certain opinion and keeps changing the code haha» (Very good)

14. How was the coverage of the lab exercises (Tutorial and modeling exercise)?

26 svarande

They covered too little»1 3%
The covered about the right amount»20 76%
They covered somewhat too much»3 11%
They covered much too much»1 3%
Don"t know»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

- depnds on task for final project (see milestone)» (The covered about the right amount)
- Less than one week after finishing the tutorial or the modeling exercise, we had a lecture on the exact same subject than what the lab exercises taught us. So we are not learning anything from these lectures when they are placed after the lab exercises.» (The covered about the right amount)
- But actually, we didn"t really learn until we started programming by ourselves.» (The covered about the right amount)

15. What is your opinion on the "Knowledge test"?

26 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Acceptable»8 30%
Quite good»15 57%
Excellent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- It can"t be a surprise how long the knowledge test takes. 1 week before the kt. you should comunicate the framework conditions!» (Acceptable)
- Rather basic, but some questions (1 or 2). I was surprised that they were considered relevant. » (Acceptable)
- Some questions were very unclear.» (Acceptable)
- easy» (Quite good)

16. What is your opinion on the paper presentations?

26 svarande

Not good»6 23%
Acceptable»13 50%
Quite good»4 15%
Excellent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- The time alloted was too little for some the papers with greater complexity (digital factory), while for others it was too much» (Not good)
- There was way too little time for each presentation. Very knowledge got through apart from the papers I read myself. » (Not good)
- I understand that all the articles presented contained very basic information that all students should know after this course. Presentation just was not right way of bringing the information. My hands were full with simulation assignment and presentation felt like an artificial must-add-some-extra-task thing. There was no time to prepare it which made many presentations poor, which led to the fact that I learned hardly anything from other"s presentatios. Contents of articles could be lectioned to students by lecturers instead. » (Not good)
- it was ok to read but hard to present» (Not good)
- I didn"t like the text "The Virtual Factory" which was the one my group had. It had surprisingly poor grammar for its level and was hard to explain I"d say.» (Acceptable)
- It would have been easier to prepare for it if the hand in of the base model had not been on the same day.» (Acceptable)
- Better to have the presentations earlier during the course so that we don"t have 2 deadlines on the same day (Base Model and Presentation).» (Acceptable)
- Good way to give feedback!» (Excellent)
- Seems like some exchange students were not as used to oral presentations» (Excellent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.34

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 32%
Very good»17 68%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Lab supervisors could have helped more to the students.» (Rather good)

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow student worked?

26 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»2 7%
Rather well»6 23%
Very well»17 65%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Split of work: 1) programming 2) presentation and report --> not good to reach course goals» (Rather well)
- Different master programmes means finding time together was harder than expected. But it went well.» (Rather well)
- Of course the project work will involve some argues but that might have been good in the purpose of learning. » (Very well)

19. How was the course workload?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»13 50%
High»12 46%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- High but fun!» (High)
- It was good that the workload was not high enough that it was possible to finish the project one week in advance» (High)
- High, but fun» (High)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 34%
High»16 61%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»14 53%
Excellent»11 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.34

- Maybe one of the better courses I"ve had at Chalmers. » (Excellent)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Projektet! Allt man lärde sig var av att göra fel och få reda hur man gör rätt! »
- The coding project with reference to a real life production. Good examples!»
- The intensity of the lab sessions, the difficulty of the project, examples of applications of the software»
- The teaching model, such as the tutorial, the project and online resources etc. »
- All topics should be preserved from my point of view. »
- the project of a bit less difficulty»
- The tutorials and the big emphasis on the final project. That teaches the best. »
- Modeling excercise, lectures»
- The project.»
- The project and the teaching methods. »
- The project, the lectures and the knowledge test.»

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Bättre organisation kring redovisningen av de literaturen vi läste! Kändes bara att vissa ville bara göra det och gå. Jag som lyssnare fattade inget!»
- The framework for the coding project as described earlier.»
- -»
- None»
- Scientific paper presentation can be done earlier in the course so that it can help students to proceed with their projects more efficiently.»
- scientific paper presentation date should be earlier, since it came at the same date with base model approval this time»
- At least double the time used for each paper presentation.»
- The lab assistants should better prepared for the different extra tasks, like the economic task this year. We were advised to use Excel, but in the end we managed to do it with Automod in a very convinient way. A lab assisstant should know that it was doable in Automod»
- remove the presentations and select case examples with more care so that there would be less of them but more informative ones.»
- See answers above.»
- Maybe skip the paper presentation, it didn"t give much»
- Move the date of paper presentation. 4 deadlines at that week - it"s too much.»

24. Additional comments

- Mycket bra kurs överlag. Det är sällan man får jobba med problem som är verklighetsbaserade på Chalmers! Men den här kursen tog verkligen upp verkliga problem i produktionen. »
- -»
- Thanks for the well planned and implemented course!»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.34
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.83

Kursutvärderingssystem från