ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design methodology preparatory course 2010/2011, PPU140

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-12 - 2011-01-30
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Lars Almefelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 87%
Around 20 hours/week»1 12%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.12

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 25%
100%»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 37%
Yes, definitely»4 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»5 62%
Great extent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- good to have the handouts printed for you and handed out in class but it should also be on the webpage» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»8 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»6 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 87%
High»1 12%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 37%
High»5 62%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»6 75%
Excellent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Good for 4 credit course» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The content and pretty much everything»
- Course is really good and the methodology used in this course is useful and should be applied to the projects in the spring and master thesis project also.»
- projects»
- project (homework)»
- The fun part of teaching should be retained for further years»
- Groupwork»
- Limited number of students with more interaction.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lecture is little to long. I cannot focus through out the lecture.»
- Duration should be high»
- nothing»
- As personal choice I expect a simple technical issues can be identified and worked out through the project.»
- Actual industrial problems can be taken as a case study so that the learning become more visual.»

16. Additional comments

- This course is really useful and help me to get the right methodology and tools in designing a product»
- I think we could cover the subject in fewer lectures.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från