ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT215 - Radioecology and radioanalytical chemistry, KBT215

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-22 - 2011-01-12
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 75%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

1. Lectures: Difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the lectures in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 33%
3»4 66%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. Lectures: Interesting

Please grade how interesting the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»2 33%
5»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

3. Lectures: Relevance

Please grade how relevant the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»3 50%
5»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. Lectures: Handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 16%
3»2 33%
4»0 0%
5»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was difficult to read some of the printouts.» (2)

5. Lectures: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 16%
5»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

6. Lectures: Number of lectures

Would you have liked more lectures to cover the course?

5 svarande

Yes»3 60%
No»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

7. Lecturer: Prof. Gunnar Skarnemark

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 16%
3»2 33%
4»1 16%
5»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. Lecturer: Adj.Prof. Henrik Ramebäck

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»3 50%
5»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. Laboratory exercises: understanding

Please indicate how the labs have increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 16%
3»1 16%
4»4 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A bit better planning is needed!» (2)

10. Laboratory exercises: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the labs have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»2 33%
5»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. Laboratory exercises: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the labs have been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 16%
4»4 66%
5»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Plant lab can be developed...» (3)

12. Laboratory exercises: Liquid scintillation - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 33%
5»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. Laboratory exercises: Liquid scintillation - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 33%
3»4 66%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. Laboratory exercises: Liquid scintillation - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic. Eng. Emma Aneheim if applicable, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 16%
5»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

5 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 40%
4»2 40%
5»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

6 svarande

1»1 16%
2»1 16%
3»2 33%
4»2 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

17. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Prof. Christian Ekberg if applicable, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»2 50%
4»1 25%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor PProf. Gunnar Skarnemark if applicable, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

5 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 20%
3»1 20%
4»2 40%
5»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. Project assignment: understanding

Please indicate how the project assignment has increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»4 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. Project assignment: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the project assignment has been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»3 50%
5»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The project assignments should be used next year as well, but preferably handed out a little earlier in the course. It would also be good if some calculations on statistics were included in all of the assigments. » (5)

21. Project assignment: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the project assignment has been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»2 33%
5»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. Project assignment: difficulty

Please grade the project assignment with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 50%
4»3 50%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The project assignment was very good. However it would have been good to have a short presentation in front of the class since everybody had different assignments. » (4)

23. General: Workload

Please indicate how you perceive the 7.5 hp workload, with 1 being "very low" and 5 "very high".

6 svarande

1»1 16%
2»2 33%
3»3 50%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- It would be a good idea to include some calculation exercises in addition to the project assignments, both to get more workload and to get better understanding of the statistics part of the course. To increase the workload more detailed information on some topics should be given, e.g. LSC, alpha spectrometry, mass spectrometry, transport of certain radionuclides in different ecosystems.» (1)

24. General: Course material

Please grade the course material used, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

6 svarande

1»1 16%
2»2 33%
3»1 16%
4»2 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The handouts were very good, but a textbook for some additional reading would have been good.» (4)

25. General: Textbook

In this course no designated textbook was used. What is your opinion about that?

- There should definitely be some sort of course material other than the lecture slides. If no textbook covering both radioecology and radioanalytical chemistry can be found, relevant articles should be used to cover the other topic. It might also be possible to use only articles and no textbook. »
- The slides covered the course very good so no textbook was needed.»

26. General: Administration

Please grade the course administration in general, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

6 svarande

1»1 16%
2»0 0%
3»2 33%
4»3 50%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

27. General: Information

Please indicate how well course information was provided, with 1 being "terribly" and 5 "excellently".

6 svarande

1»1 16%
2»1 16%
3»2 33%
4»2 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

28. Exam

Please indicate how well the exam reflected the course, with 1 being "poorly" and 5 "very well".

6 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 16%
4»3 50%
5»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.71

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.71
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.67

Kursutvärderingssystem från