ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT166 - Applied Nuclear Chemistry, KBT166

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-22 - 2011-01-12
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 70%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

1. Lectures: Difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the lectures in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

10 svarande

1»1 10%
2»1 10%
3»6 60%
4»2 20%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Haven"t been there» (?)
- Not attending» (?)
- GOOD» (3)
- just appropriate difficulty level!» (3)

2. Lectures: Interesting

Please grade how interesting the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 40%
4»5 50%
5»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Haven"t been there» (?)
- Not attending» (?)

3. Lectures: Relevance

Please grade how relevant the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

10 svarande

1»1 10%
2»0 0%
3»3 30%
4»4 40%
5»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Haven"t been there» (?)
- Not attending» (?)
- for me it was more effective to study on my own than to attend lectures» (1)

4. Lectures: Handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

12 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 33%
4»2 16%
5»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Having to sometimes attend other courses during the applied nuclear chemistry lectures, i managed to catch up with the handouts: that came in very handy.» (5)

5. Lectures: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»1 9%
4»5 45%
5»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Not attending» (?)

6. Lectures: Number of lectures

Would you have liked more lectures to cover the course?

11 svarande

Yes»2 18%
No»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- Not attending» (?)
- There is nothing to cover...» (No)

7. Lecturer: Prof. Gunnar Skarnemark (most lectures)

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 20%
3»3 30%
4»2 20%
5»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Haven"t been there» (?)
- Not attending» (?)
- He"s a very good lecturer, very knowledgeable about all things relevant. Sadly, his stuttering makes him at times hard to follow and understand.» (3)

8. Lecturer: Lic. Eng. Joachim Holm (Severe accident chemistry)

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»6 54%
4»4 36%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the class was good, but the handouts could use some improvements: I found it not so clear, when I read it after the class» (4)
- Interesting subject» (4)

9. Lecturer: Prof. Emeritus Jan-Olov Liljenzin (The Universe and the Making of the Chemical Elements)

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 27%
4»5 45%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. Home exercise - MALRAD: understanding

Please indicate how the home exercise - MALRAD - has increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

12 svarande

1»1 8%
2»1 8%
3»3 25%
4»6 50%
5»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.41 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Interesting layout of the exercise, although more feedback would be appreciated. » (3)
- I wouldn"t say it helped me understand the course content, but it was an excellent way to apprehend its applications.» (3)
- nice with some repetition from nuclear chemistry. too much time was given at the start of the period, it would have been better to start with the laborations and letting us work with the MALRAD case meanwhile.» (4)

11. Home exercise - MALRAD: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the home exercise - MALRAD - has been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

12 svarande

1»1 8%
2»1 8%
3»2 16%
4»7 58%
5»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- i liked this exercise. it was nice to have our own case to solve. i learned alot even though most of the practical work was repetition from first chemistry laborations.» (5)

12. Home exercise - MALRAD: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the home exercise - MALRAD - has been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

12 svarande

1»1 8%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»8 66%
5»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. Home exercise - MALRAD: difficulty

Please grade the home exercise - MALRAD - with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 27%
3»5 45%
4»3 27%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I couldn"t say, because we were not sure what we were expected to do, and I haven"t had the results yet, so i don"t know if I handled it properly!» (?)
- I think it is very boring that everybody that passed the exercise got 3 bonus points» (2)

14. Laboratory exercises: understanding

Please indicate how the labs have increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

12 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 8%
3»2 16%
4»7 58%
5»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- they were well explained, and were a nice opportunity to discuss the content of the course, and check I had understood it well.(haven"t had my exam results though!!!)» (5)

15. Laboratory exercises: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the labs have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

12 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 16%
4»7 58%
5»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.08 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the link between the lab topic and the course was very clear» (5)

16. Laboratory exercises: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the labs have been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 18%
4»7 63%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- also, all the supervisors were encouraging, and dynamic, which only made the labs even more interesting.» (5)

17. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»0 0%
4»8 72%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»7 63%
4»1 9%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic. Eng. Emma Aneheim if applicable, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»7 63%
5»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Ph.D. Teodora Retegan if applicable, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 30%
4»4 40%
5»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

21. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using mass spectrometry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»5 50%
4»3 30%
5»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using mass spectrometry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 20%
3»4 40%
4»2 20%
5»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

23. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using mass spectrometry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Kristian Larsson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 27%
4»4 36%
5»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- Gave several additional, very tricky, questions to be answered, at a time when time was needed for preparations for the exam. His sense of timing is... not adequate» (3)

24. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»1 9%
2»0 0%
3»1 9%
4»6 54%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Pretty simple, and uninteresting» (1)

25. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»1 9%
2»1 9%
3»6 54%
4»1 9%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

26. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Ph.D. Stellan Holgersson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 20%
4»4 40%
5»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

27. Calculation exercises: relevance

Please grade how relevant the calculation exercises in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»5 50%
4»4 40%
5»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

28. Calculation exercises: difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the calculation exercises in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 10%
3»7 70%
4»2 20%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Made unnecessarily hard due to speeding through HOW things are calculated (which formulas to use, where to find them, where to find values for constants), in preference for the calculations themselves» (4)

29. Calculation exercises: handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»2 18%
4»5 45%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Quite good, but at times, more rigorous use of source of formulas and values would have been welcome.» (3)

30. Calculation exercises: number of occasions

Would you have liked more calculation exercises to cover the course?

10 svarande

Yes»3 30%
No»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- On several occasions, the calculations felt rushed (see also above, about focus on wrong parts)» (Yes)

31. Calculation exercises: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»6 54%
4»3 27%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

32. Calculation exercises: supervisors

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Joachim Holm, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»3 27%
4»6 54%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Lots of errors in the calculations ...» (2)
- I think Joachim is very good, but it seemed to be a lot of work for just one supervisor, and sometimes the exercises seemed to be not so well prepared. Maybe it should be considered a similar system as with the labs, with different supervisors in charge of different exercises?» (4)

33. General: Workload

Please indicate how you perceive the 7.5 hp workload, with 1 being "very low" and 5 "very high".

12 svarande

1»2 16%
2»2 16%
3»4 33%
4»3 25%
5»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- I worked almost nothing with this course and I think I got a good grade... The points earned are way to cheap» (1)
- MUCH better than previous period.» (3)

34. General: Textbook

Please grade the book "Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry", with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»2 18%
4»6 54%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The graphic layout is sometimes hard to read/see/understand due to low print quality/scaling.» (2)
- Good with additional stuff from Gunnar» (4)
- It is very interresting, but a little bit too much considering the time we have. Some parts of the book are essential, and some are just interresting for our general knowledge, but it is really not clear which information is essential or not. the lecture debriefing are really necessary to understand all the things we have to remember, and also to have a clear handouts to read before the exam. » (4)
- just a suggestion : sould there be yet another version, a table of the tables might be inserted! My book is filled with post"its (?) that indicate where to find the various tables and figures! apart from that, it is excellent » (5)

35. General: Administration

Please grade the course administration in general, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»6 54%
4»2 18%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good and fast answers from Stefan» (5)

36. General: Information

Please indicate how well course information was provided, with 1 being "terribly" and 5 "excellently".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 27%
4»7 63%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

37. Exam

Please indicate how well the exam reflected the course, with 1 being "poorly" and 5 "very well".

12 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 16%
4»6 50%
5»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Do you really think that anyone got time to answer 37 questions? I think it is stupid. If one has anything to say, they will write it in the comments.» (4)
- I am not so keen on so few points for the exercises. It"s just that learning by heart is not my strong point!! Though I did my best, I swear! Anyway, i would support a 50/50 system, as for the nuclear chemistry exam.» (4)
- Good exam» (5)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.71

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.71
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.67

Kursutvärderingssystem från