Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced ICM theory (Chalmers), TEK300

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-21 - 2011-01-18
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 25%
Around 20 hours/week»2 50%
Around 25 hours/week»1 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The workload was depending on the week, very good that it felt as that the teachers at least had made an attempt to synchronize the two parallel courses!» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 100%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 50%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»1 50%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 75%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Many of the lectures did not feel as relevant as they could and it was hard to find a red thread. Still, I assume that is the price to pay for having only guest lectures.» (Some extent)
- The lectures did not provide me with very much new knowledge, it was quite much repetition and not advanced.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»2 50%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 100%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- However, it is good if the responsible person answers on questions posted at the webportal, or else it kind of looses its function» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 100%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Good with frequent scheduled consultants» (Rather good)
- I would have appreciated some more consultation on the group case.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 25%
Rather well»3 75%
Very well»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Most of the group worked well together, but it was very difficult to cooperate with one person in the group.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 25%
Adequate»0 0%
High»3 75%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 25%
Adequate»3 75%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- It did not feel as the courses added very much new data and the broad scope of the lectures made the courses less interesting since it never left a basic level. Nothing build on each other and it felt as we did not reach up to an advanced level.» (Adequate)
- Too much repetition to be called "advanced". Generally very good lecturers!!» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The workshop were everyone presented their group works. This event exceeded my expectations! »
- The lecturers»
- The group case»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps make the last assignment and the goals a little bit clearer and ask the questions in a way that allows for my analysis as less focused on stating obvious facts that we learned already in high school....»
- Instruct the lecturers on what context their lecture is in. What ICM is, what we have learnt before etc.. Too many of them asked us for example: Do you know what a patent is...?»
- I think that someone needs to see too that there is a red thread for the lectures and I think that the level of the lectures could be much higher. It should be a course in ADVANCED ICM, not easy.»
- Create a red thread in the lectures and make sure that they build on what we already know... It didn"t really feel like it was "advanced" this year.»

16. Additional comments

- From my point of view, the course will be more interesting and valuable if it is more focused on a smaller area where the lectures build on each other, or at least are aligned. I think the scope was to broad and far to focused on legal subject for me to really benefit from it. However, I very much appreciated the discussion connected to the group work, both within and between the groups.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från