ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Wireless and photonic system engineering, SSY085, MPMPE,HT2007

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-10-12 - 2007-11-05
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Lena Peterson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 25%
Around 20 hours/week»9 56%
Around 25 hours/week»2 12%
Around 30 hours/week»1 6%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»2 12%
75%»7 43%
100%»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

- It´,s very good to attend the teacher when he or she doesn´,t use slides to support the lecture. In this way it´,s likely to get some feedback from students» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 13%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 86%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.86

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 46%
Yes, definitely»4 26%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»7 43%
Large extent»4 25%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- sometimes the planning of the lecture was too big for the time to be used.» (Some extent)
- Lennart main ideas of teaching are great but in practice it is mostly a blur. He should organize and summarize his lectures. Henrik Sunnerud is hardly prepared for his own lectures.» (Some extent)
- Both Lennart Lundgren and Magnus Karlsson are great educators. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»9 60%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- Not all the things are useful for exams» (Some extent)
- It is to much to ask that one that only read this course in this master program should buy that optics books for so few chapters.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»1 6%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»9 56%
Very well»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»1 6%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»2 12%
Very good»11 68%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Lennart is crazy. For real.» (Rather poor)
- Especially with Lennart Lundgren..he´,s great!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»1 6%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»5 31%
Very well»9 56%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»12 75%
High»3 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 18%
Adequate»10 62%
High»2 12%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»2 12%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»3 18%
Good»8 50%
Excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- I didn"t like the lectures at all. Lennart"s were very messy and it wasn"t any structure on the notes he made on the white board. I didn"t explained the different steps in his calculations and it wasn"t very easy to follow his notes. The course book didn"t cover everything in the course so it wasn"t easy to know what to learn for the exam. And also, I don"t think the students are deaf...» (Poor)
- Goode ideas, but poorly executed. I fear the exam, not because of fear of it being hard, but that I will have misinterpreted Lennarts questions. » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The pedagogical ideas of Lennart, to teach the skill to be realistic and make estimations. »
- the approach of the course is good»
- beeing there for the student, which you always are!»
- The feed-back. The combination of both wireless and optics were really nice.»
- The teachers.»
- Knowledge about wireless system engineering.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lennart. Henrik Sunnerud.»
- team work are a good way of working but mayb they should be more "guided".»
- I think more weight should be on excersies in pozar´,s book, they are good! then some designtasks which you had.»

16. Additional comments

- Lennart is a good lecturer, but he is very loud.»
- I wonder if Lennart should actually be both examinor and lecturer. He needs someone that keeps him on a short leash.»
- teacher dynamic who likes what he is teaching and that"s good .»
- The course was really hard, and I did not have enouth time to learn and read everything related to this course.»
- I learned want I want to learn in this course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från