Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Human factors and ergonomics for engineers (2010), MPP091

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-20 - 2010-12-31
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 25%
Around 20 hours/week»7 35%
Around 25 hours/week»6 30%
Around 30 hours/week»2 10%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- The project work was much more extent than first estimated. So the work load kept increasing during the whole course.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 10%
50%»2 10%
75%»12 60%
100%»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- My courses had the same lecture times...» (25%)
- My other course collied very often.» (50%)
- Did not have time to attend all» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 86%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Haven"t read the goals » (?)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 43%
Yes, definitely»8 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Still haven"t read the goals» (?)
- There was hard to get a higher grade than 3 on the quizes. The question could be difficult and hard to understand. The home exam was unneccassary. I think it had been enough with the quizes and the project. The home exam didn"t show anything more about what I know. » (To some extent)
- Very good with the duggas.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»6 30%
Large extent»9 45%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- It was good with the demonstration on the method that should be used.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»4 20%
Some extent»4 20%
Large extent»9 45%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 15%
Rather well»8 40%
Very well»9 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I didn"t get why we needed to print the report and home exam. It had been better if we could have handed in the reports on the course page.» (Rather well)
- Fast answered mails etc.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»4 20%
Very good»14 70%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- It was hard to get in touch with the teachers by phone.» (Rather poor)
- You always get quick answers when asking through e-mail. That was very good.» (Very good)
- At least via mail.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»6 30%
Very well»13 65%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- There was only a problems about how to write a report and the sources that is needed.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»12 60%
High»4 20%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I am glad that a "TD-course" did put some pressure on the students. That is not always the case. So I think two short exams, a project and a presentation is suitible for this type of course.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»9 45%
High»7 35%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- I read 150%...» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 25%
Good»8 40%
Excellent»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The evaluation with 3 parts : quizzes, project and home exam»
- The duggas and the different lecturers.»
- Lars-Ola!»
- This Course should be preserved to the next year»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Dont use two exams plus a big poject»
- More feedback on our own work earlier so you know which area you have missed to treat.»
- If you preserve the home examination, do not link it as much to the report. Several answers had to be rather forced so I could fill up at least one page. This with a text which basically told why we had not used the methods asked for.»
- I think that the project outline could be different. Now there was nine assignment that each group should answer, but this did just make the report writing much much harder. We could not follow a ordinary report strucutre, but had to add one chapter for each assignment. It would have been much better if the project information stated: "You should examine the product regarding, physical loadings, cognitive ergonomics and enviromental factors...". Then one knows that a theory chapter is neeeded, an result part and analysis followed by discussion and conclusions. »
- The home exam seemed pretty unnecessary as the whole course had already been covered in the project and the short exams. »
- no home exam»
- Nothing to be Changed just to include the latest updates of the Ergonomic approach»

16. Additional comments

- Why claim that you do not have to exam us on the methods due to that we use them in the report. And then hand out a home examination only about methods?»
- Honest speaking, I can not see the point to have an additional exam in form of a home exam just to show you that both of the members in the project have participated. It is enough to have the two first exams and the project because the course is on a basic level and do not need a home exam as well.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från