Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Modeling and fabrication of micro/nanodevices, MCC115, MPNAN, HT2010, MCC115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-17 - 2011-01-23
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

25 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 32%
Around 20 hours/week»5 20%
Around 25 hours/week»7 28%
Around 30 hours/week»5 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- it was a projetc study that is why i have spent time approximately 8 hours per week for the project » (?)
- I think around 15 hours a week.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Very varying. Some weeks 0h and some around 30h.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Very nice do the partical work» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

25 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 24%
100%»18 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- There was no teaching in that sence» (?)
- I attended on the first start up lecture. Then me and my supervisor made an individual plan of work.» (100%)
- since it was project work, it was obligatory to attend.» (100%)
- I am so happy to work with Aldo. he is nice teacher.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

26 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 3%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»21 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- The work in the project is correspondens to the description in the studie portal.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- Because I set the goals.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- Every thing clear when you work particaly» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

25 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»25 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- This is a logical cotinuation of the introductory course in micro/nano-technology.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- we achived his goal in our project» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

24 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»6 25%
Yes, definitely»16 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- i didnt get exam.» (?)
- I guess.» (Yes, definitely)
- The presentatio and report were done with focus on my work.» (Yes, definitely)
- The presentation assess whether I have reached the goals or not.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»4 15%
Large extent»12 46%
Great extent»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- If with teaching I count everything that our supervisors have told then that is what I now know.» (Great extent)
- I have leart a lot of intresting facts from my supervisor.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»2 7%
Some extent»10 38%
Large extent»11 42%
Great extent»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- I have just read some articles and the old lecture notes.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»5 20%
Rather well»14 56%
Very well»6 24%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

- There"s probably a better way to appoint the different projects at the start. Otherwise it was ok with the little information that were sent out.» (Rather badly)
- But email worked» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

26 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 7%
Rather good»2 7%
Very good»20 76%
I did not seek help»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- My supervisor always had time to answer questions.» (Very good)
- its defined on your project supervisor» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

26 svarande

Very poorly»3 11%
Rather poorly»1 3%
Rather well»6 23%
Very well»14 53%
I did not seek cooperation»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- If the Group members are not active then its very big trouble. If I want to pass, I must make them to motivate and work.» (Rather poorly)
- It was a one person project.» (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»19 73%
High»6 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.19

- Some weeks low and some weeks high. Overall it was of average.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»12 46%
High»11 42%
Too high»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Because of one extra course» (High)
- My other course that took more time.» (High)

Course specific questions

13. Would you say that more time is needed for completions of the projects, and if so how?

24 svarande

No, there was already enough time for the projects.»12 50%
Prefer more time within same study period, same credits»6 25%
Prefer extended time into next study period, same credits»6 25%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- Prefer extended time into next study period, with EXTRA credits. The time was too short. This course has fun and learning.» (?)
- I would have wanted to started earlier in the study period. Then I would have had more time towards the end.» (Prefer more time within same study period, same credits)
- It might be better to do all the research during the study period and then write the report in January.» (Prefer extended time into next study period, same credits)
- I think this is important for people who has poor experience with working in the cleanroom and do not understand the small delicacies of the different steps (some projects have >15 for the device).» (Prefer extended time into next study period, same credits)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 11%
Good»13 50%
Excellent»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- Good to ge to apply you previous knowledge to som practical work.» (Good)
- The course as a whole is good, although I was not fully satisfied with my advisor.» (Good)
- its very nice that every body do work in clean room. for me its so good i learn alot.» (Good)
- It is a opportunity to get a view of what science and research are. Maybe the best course I have taken at Chalmers.» (Excellent)
- Although the course gets this high grade since I had very good supervisors. Bad supervisors and the grade would have went down.» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lab projects are a nice way to do some practical work. They should be preserved next year.»
- the lab experience students get»
- The coordinators»
- That you can bring in your own pet project.»
- The whole system is good but lottery system is bad because it loses interest in project »
- generally i have engaged only one supervisor. he is really good. so , supervisor should be kept for the next year.»
- Alting»
- +general structure of the course which is based on the learning by ding and experience +clear Project definition +hand on tasks»
- Everything.»
- experimental aspects of the course.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More clear information about report and presentation so we know what to be expected of us.»
- Nothing really, it is a good course.»
- The groups could have some half-way presentation, just to see the statuses.»
- give marks instead of passfail»
- Deadlines should be clearer for completion of the report, our report did not get proofread enought because of this and if we had known we got 3-4 days more on us, the quality of the english in the report would have been better. Now it is at best abysmal.»
- Lottery system»
- No. of credits and time»
- In addition to emphasis on experimental part of the course, It could be really good mentoring students in some lectures about experimental research disciplines, scientific behavior and how to make good report out of and experimental work.»
- The projects should be broader in nature and not be so focused on superconductors.»
- that every body choose there own choice project.»
- this courese is a time consuming one, it should have more credits.»

17. Additional comments

- we, as a group, have performed some part of the experiments in MC2 building on the first floor. i think professor who is responsible for that floor was Owe Orwar. he was very unkind towards our group by his look...i dont know what was the problem but if we bothered him, he would, at least, talk to us about what was wrong with our behaviours but instead he preferred to stared us whit evil eyes and made us feel very disturbed during the sessions. we didnt feel good about his attitudes towards us. we felt extremely discriminated since all of us are middle eastern students. i hope in the future he will pay more attention about his attitudes towards students. huseyin yigit yigith@student.chalmers.se »
- t »
- First thinks to August and then my supervisor Aldo. help us more in our project work. we learn alot from Aldo.»
- no comments.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från