Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Integrated Product Development, TEK150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-16 - 2011-01-08
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43%
Kontaktperson: Lars Trygg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 11%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»6 35%
Around 30 hours/week»3 17%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 11%
75%»6 35%
100%»9 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.41

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 41%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- The goals sounds nice, but are to universal. Could be about many things» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- It was not clear enough that the first chapters of the literature were going to be in the exam» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- they where on every lecture» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 12%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 87%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- I don"t think they are specific enough, and that the level of the course is not high enough for being on a Master Program. » (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 50%
Yes, definitely»8 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Some parts of the exam were really fussy(1c, 2b) where the challenge was to understand the question, or to remember a specific slide that were mentioned in study week 2.» (To some extent)
- It was not clear enough that the first chapters of the literature were going to be in the exam» (To some extent)
- The exam questions had all already been on previous exams which we had access to. The questions where also testing more for remembering things from the course literature than testing for deeper understanding...» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 47%
Large extent»7 41%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- Many of the lectures has been interesting, although the learning outcome might be moderate.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 41%
Large extent»8 47%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- The book is old and feels old, a quick look on wikipedia(and its reference list) gives a lot of articles that are 15-20 years younger that might be interesting. But the book was good for speed-training before the exam» (Some extent)
- The book is dull.» (Some extent)
- The book should be updated. » (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»3 17%
Rather well»10 58%
Very well»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- There were no structure on the documents on pngpong and some came out late. would be good with a course assistant.» (Rather badly)
- When Trygg was hospitalized, very little information was provided on the future scheduling.» (Rather badly)
- We never knew who the course assistant was, and when Lars was sick we did ot get any information of who to turn to if we needed help with the topic report or wanted to know what was happening with our lecturs.The lecture notes could be better organized (for example a map for each week where the notes could be placed). » (Rather badly)
- could be improved using discussion forums» (Rather well)
- Use folders please!» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»6 35%
Rather good»6 35%
Very good»2 11%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- Was not so good for 2weeks or so when Lars was Hospitalized, couldnt the course a course asistant helped up the situation» (Rather poor)
- There was not enough possibility to get help on the topic reports.» (Rather poor)
- We never knew who the course assistant was, and when Lars was sick we did ot get any information of who to turn to if we needed help with the topic report or wanted to know what was happening with our lecturs. (We never got any clear feed back about our topic report during the writing process.) » (Rather poor)
- Probably due to Lars illness, we were a bit confused abput the topic reports» (Rather poor)
- Lars could not help he got ill but the supervision for the TR suffered by this matter. » (Rather good)
- lars is helpful and answers e-mail» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»6 35%
Very well»8 47%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- The groups are of different sizes. Some people usually are not that good in writing or reading, while others just dont have a high ambition level. Being four in a group, where 2 just jerk around, is not really good!» (Rather poorly)
- Well, we got the work done but It was neither Effective nor Efficient. Strange with respect to the fact that we are being educated to lead group work, among other things, and also that the course goals are some focus on efficiency and effectiveness. » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 17%
Adequate»9 52%
High»4 23%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- It was High and kept me busy. But I loved it.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»5 29%
High»10 58%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- Partly becuse the other course had so much extra work and partly because there was none to turn to about the topic report once the teacher got sick.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»3 17%
Adequate»2 11%
Good»9 52%
Excellent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- The whole course feels just like a long list of different set-ups of an organization. I would like more discussion connected to examples from reality. The topic report is possible to connect to the course goal, but I have hard to see how I as I student have learned something from it. And the AM-case, might be good but it is just squeezed, and a pass/fail task that far into the period is never good. » (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Litterature seminar, DFA, Lean Development Game»
- Literature reviews, Lean development game»
- the case and bonus points on topic report»
- The lecturs are very well prepared. »
- The workshops»
- The literature review »
- The seminars»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the guest lecture from Acando. He was very very unstructured, strange etc!»
- Applied materials - would be funnier with more smaller cases during the course. Many of the TR are not that good and then I"m forced to read them for the exam... I would like to have it another way! Maybe cases on the topics instead - or to chose some of the topics and integrate them. »
- The book, the Topic report, the AM-case»
- More discussion and less learning bullets.»
- It would be nice to see a different course book, and if the lectures could be held at the Vasa building.»
- The course assistant should be presented, the homepage could be better organized. »
- The book»
- The idea with TR is good but when half of them have not reached the "right" end point according Lars, I think the task is a failure. So much work for nothing. Why not just add 1 or 2 lectures so everybody get the the same and "right" information. »
- The exam was rather boring and very detail focused.»
- The Applied Materials case was very interesting, but it felt as it wasn"t given enough space in the course. Also the exam - see earlier answer.»

16. Additional comments

- overall i don"t like when the exams looks exactly the same... the exam could be easy even if the questions not are exactly the same»
- Ida create a lot of urgency in her course, compared to this - she foces me to put a lot of effort (not hard tasks, just work intensive) which inflicts on the time I spend on this class. There must be a better balance! »
- The exam was a bit better the the old ones reguarding the level of "parrot-knowledge" that was required, but can definitely be improved. Gives a lazy impression that neither time for review nor re-exams is mentioned. »
- The Course all together was very interesting. Lars was extraordinary during the lectures when he brought the Applied Materials case history live at the class. Was just wondering whether I could get one more chance to listen to his Lectures. Thank you Professor.»
- If you go to a company and ask to see their development funnel, they will not show it to you, because it doesn"t exist. But it"s good to know about it as a means of picturing the development process.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från