Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Material mechanics, 2010, mha042
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-12-15 - 2011-01-07 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26% Kontaktperson: Ragnar Larsson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 25% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.37 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 8 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 12% |
75%» | | 4 | | 50% |
100%» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 3. Which masterprogram do you follow?Mention MPSTR, MPAME or MPAEM or specify if it does not apply.- MPAME»
- MPAEM»
- ERASMUS»
- Mpstr»
- MPAEM»
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 25% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 37% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 2.87 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.7 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 6 | | 85% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.14 6. Did the total examination of the course assess whether you have reached the goals?7 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 57% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 42% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.42
Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.87 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 37% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 3.62
Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 7 | | 87% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 4.12 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 50% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4 12. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 50% |
High» | | 2 | | 25% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 3.37 13. How was the total workload this study period?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 25% |
High» | | 4 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 25% |
Good» | | 3 | | 37% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 15. Additional comments- it was pretty hard in the beginning to understand exactly what the course was about. A little longer and better introduction and maybe repetition might be a good thing to have in the future. Also, there would have been nice to have some sort of reading guide to the course litterature. It felt like there was a lot of text that didn"t had to be read and it was also sometimes hard to find the right stuff. A short notice at each lecturenote on which pages in for example PRIMER that the lecture covers would be useful.»
- Lecture notes are very helpful but if the equations are numbered and referenced when used in other places it can be very helpful.
Primer was not so much of help for me.
All the supervisors and lecturer were very helpful.Thank you all.»
16. What would you like to preserve in the course?- Labassistants (Carl) and Lecturer. The dugga questions and the oral presentation was also pretty good for learning.»
- All of it.Put an extra lecture for the tensor algebra.»
17. Which changes would like in the course?- An easier way to see if what one have written down for each duggaquestion and additional question is actually correct. Might be good if at least one of the labassistants maybe should have the answers so that there are more people to ask for help.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|