ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Sustainable Building - Competition, ARK 350

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-16 - 2011-01-10
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Michael Edén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

- to design sustainable architecture

13 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»2 15%
Sufficient»9 69%
Excellent»2 15%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

- Groupwork trouble» (Insufficient)
- The exercises were quite useful. If the subject of the competition was more related to the Sustainable Building course, perhaps the results would have been better. » (Sufficient)
- Time was not enough for exercising all the things we"ve learnt. Besides a theater building was really a hard task to do.» (Sufficient)

2. Learning outcome 2

- to describe and analyze the basic features of sustainable building

13 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»2 15%
Sufficient»9 69%
Excellent»2 15%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

- groupwork trouble» (Sufficient)
- Related to the final result of the project, many aspects were addressed but the relevant information was not shown on the posters. Space (how many posters) and time (length of the competition part in relation to the subject as well as time distribution within the groups) led to an unbalance in the focus of the project.» (Sufficient)

3. Learning outcome 3

- to design systems for good indoor climate and energy efficiency

13 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»4 30%
Sufficient»8 61%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- Groupwork trouble» (Insufficient)
- Understanding the issues relevant is important, but reaching the goal would have been easier with smaller exercises and actual calculation.» (Insufficient)

4. Learning outcome 4

- to synthesize programme issues into a competition entry

13 svarande

Very insufficient»1 7%
Insufficient»2 15%
Sufficient»7 53%
Excellent»3 23%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- The brief was explaning well for us students for the project.» (Excellent)

5. Learning outcome 5

- to visualize the performance concerning energy, environment and indoor climate in a building

13 svarande

Very insufficient»1 8%
Insufficient»2 16%
Sufficient»8 66%
Excellent»1 8%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.75

6. Learning outcome 6

- to cooperate across discipline boundaries in a design process

13 svarande

Very insufficient»3 25%
Insufficient»2 16%
Sufficient»5 41%
Excellent»2 16%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Groupwork trouble» (Very insufficient)
- Engiiners usually waited for architects to finish the design, so that I can"t say they were involved in the design process.» (Very insufficient)
- Although the cooperation with the engineers was very good, productive and interesting, the time was not enough to reach a better understanding of each other"s processes. Time management on our behalf may be the main reason. Similar courses in earlier stages would have been extremely useful.» (Insufficient)

7. Learning outcome 7

- to use competitions as means for reflection and professional developemnt

13 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»3 23%
Sufficient»8 61%
Excellent»2 15%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- Groupwork trouble» (Insufficient)
- Because of the competition, we couldn"t get information from the fellow students. That was tricky.» (Sufficient)
- All the problems that we had to deal with made me reflect a lot on the balance of forces within a group, as well as the prioritization of issues within each project.» (Excellent)

8. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

13 svarande

No, the goals are to elementary»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»11 91%
No, the goals are too ambitious»1 8%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.08

9. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

13 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»2 15%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»6 46%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»5 38%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- this course took more than half of a semester 18 hours daily work, the whole weekends we worked. overloading, disappointing from the first, sickness and tiredness. This course made us involved whole the semester, I had to remove some other courses and my life, just working for this course, also, I could not concentrate on the other course when competition finished because I had to worked on competition project, even after it has finished.» (Too small scope in relation to credits)
- Worked almost more than fulltime even though the course was supposed to be halftime» (Too wide scope in relation to credits)

Education and course administration

10. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

13 svarande

Very little»2 15%
Rather little»4 30%
Rather big»7 53%
Very big»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- Would have been good with more lectures to get more knowledge» (Very little)

11. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

13 svarande

Very bad»1 7%
Rather bad»1 7%
Rather well»11 84%
Very well»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- I guess the consultations were not enough for students to improve the project. We"ve stayed at the design level so long that we couldn"t get enough consultation for the technical parts.» (Rather bad)

Work environment

12. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»6 46%
Very well»7 53%
I have not asked for assistance»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Whenever we need extra information, teachers were welcomed and helpful.» (Very well)

13. How did the team formation for the competition work?

13 svarande

Very bad»4 30%
Rather bad»6 46%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»1 7%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

- I did not like my team at all, bad performance, torpidity, uninterest to the topic. Some of my group members were unmotivating me all the time.» (Very bad)
- The formation of the teachers team was very good, covering all the aspects that had to be considered. The group work (within the student groups) worked rather poorly.» (Rather bad)

14. Laboratory exercises - did they work?

The question concerns all four labs in general

13 svarande

Not useful»0 0%
Partly useful»1 9%
Useful»6 54%
Very useful»4 36%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- The lab exercises were a good start for the competition.» (Very useful)

15. Launching the competition

Lecture at Älvrummet and by Izikowitz

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 8%
Rather good»10 83%
Excellent»1 8%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3

- More inspiration lectures about theatres would have been good or other complex building with sustainable thinking» (Rather good)

16. The object for the competition and the programme

Relevant assignment? Relevant programme? OK - we now know that the theatre staff gave us unclear input, but otherwise?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 16%
Rather good»9 75%
Excellent»1 8%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- Inspiring & fun object and site! Maybe too complex for the time span, too much time went to solving the program & plans. A more clear program is needed.» (Rather bad)
- Very interesting and complex topic that raised a lot of questions. A big subject to work on. I believe that the whole assignment has given me a good background when it comes to dealing complex projects. Time can never be enough.» (Rather good)

17. Cooperation

Your opinion of the team work, especially between professions

13 svarande

Very bad»4 30%
Rather bad»5 38%
Rather good»2 15%
Excellent»2 15%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- Groupwork trouble» (Very bad)
- I couldn"t get information from the engineer at all - indeed I had to check the structure and another architect had to model the structure.» (Very bad)
- Students who will take this course need more knowledge and motivation. I think somebodies took this course because of working in large groups will cover their weaknesses and they can pass a course in a reputable university. I think we needed much time or maybe more expert people in groups to do this programme well.» (Very bad)
- Being able to discuss with engineers was really interesting, although the time management caused people to feel isolated at times. At some points we were not aware of each other"s work.» (Rather bad)

18. The jury assessment

Mainly as a learning process

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 15%
Rather good»8 61%
Excellent»3 23%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- Someone from Pustervik should have been in the jury! Or at least get comments from them afterwards. Someone with experience in sustainability should also be in the jury to lift these issues, now they didn"t seem to care about it.» (Rather bad)
- I felt it was very relevant. The points that we missed were very important, and I felt that they corresponded to a lot of my personal opinions, although the fact that all of us made the same choice about the loading dock location, does not necessarily mean that we all made a mistake.» (Rather good)
- The jury for me was professional and made clear assesments.» (Excellent)
- I learnt in that day.» (Excellent)

Concluding questions

19. What is your overall opinion of the course?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»3 23%
Good»8 61%
Very good»2 15%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- If I were at an ambitious and hardworking team, I would like the project and the process more.» (Passed)
- I think, it was a good programme. But group organization was unfairly. It made very bad feeling that I had to compete without hope to win. » (Passed)
- very fun course» (Good)

20. What should be preserved next year?

- Cooperation between architects and engineers»
- The complexity of the subject provides a very useful background and raises many issues. The BREAM, LEED, GREEN STAR files were very interesting and can put focus on a lot of different ideas in different degrees of importance.»
- Lab exercises, consultations by acustics, interview with theater owner (or in relation profession), site visit, Viserum visit etc.»
- laboratories, consultations»
- the labs before the competition. it is really helpfus»
- the labs! maybe change the last one, about the green-standards»
- the cooperation between architectures and engineers.The labs which had very useful information for the competition.»

21. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- leadership course before this course»
- Perhaps the time frame. If the length of the course could be prolonged then maybe there would have been more time to come up with more complete results, covering more ground, cooperating more with engineers, and try to achieve more goals in relation to BREAM, LEED, GREEN STAR.»
- The way building up the teams (maybe you should inform the students earlier to start forming up the teams), consultations (state what you want to talk about at the consultations before.)»
- Not have so strict rules when forming the groups, maybe it is enough to mix engineers and architects... A less complex building »
- the time for the course maybe. It lasted a little bit too long compared only 15 credits.»
- the prize money should be distributed as for how much the groups work differ in quality, since this year they didnt differ much, but the money did»

22. Other comments

- Happy holydays!»
- For me competition course was something I was looking forward to. However it turned into a torture (precisely) because of my lazy group mates unfortunately. But It was a learning as well. I learned how to deal with unmotivated and sluggish people. In my future projects, I will talk with my seniors if there is a problem between the team members.»
- Some of my friends and I had planned to take this course since we applied for MPDSD. However, we missed many things among it. »
- michael should cut down on smoking, bad habit michael :)»

Kursutvärderingssystem från