Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Technology based entrepreneurship, CIP016/TEK066

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-14 - 2010-12-22
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 4%
Around 25 hours/week»5 23%
Around 30 hours/week»7 33%
At least 35 hours/week»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.04

- Svårt att estimera när jag inte har klart för mig vilka assignments som hörde till vilken kurs (dtim eller tbe). Jag har upplevelsrn att dtim var mycket kortare, dock väldigt intensiv med mkt läsning. Jag väljer 25h/v då jag antar att all läsning hört till dtim. (om man räknar med trott-läsning i tbe skulle det bli ca 2h mer i veckan)» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 14%
100%»18 85%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

- I was luckily never ill during the semester. » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

- The grading system was unclear. During the course, we have been given contradicting (if any) information about which assignments are graded and how they are graded.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»18 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Reasonable but difficult when you don"t have a I eng background» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 38%
Yes, definitely»10 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The assessment criteria was at times diffuse...» (To some extent)
- I consider that Business Plan is a very good indicator to see how well the goals of the course were reached. It shows the ability of a student to work individually though with a previous preparation from the group works. » (Yes, definitely)
- Not yet» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 38%
Large extent»10 47%
Great extent»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»5 23%
Some extent»10 47%
Large extent»4 19%
Great extent»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Where there any course literature?» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 9%
Rather well»16 76%
Very well»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

- Mixed messages from faculty in regards to hand-outs. » (Rather badly)
- Too many last-minute schedule changes. » (Rather well)
- Boo has been giving confusing answers regarding grading and how to do some things.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 9%
Rather good»7 33%
Very good»11 52%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- Conflicting information, hard to get answers» (Rather poor)
- The major problem in the course was the impossibility to talk with the idea provider. Therefore the works were based on the assumptions we couldn´,t really back up. It would be closer to a real life project if we had more real information available. » (Rather good)
- If you could only get any straight answers...» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 28%
Very well»15 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Some more groupe dynamics would have been good» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 19%
High»17 80%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- It was high, as well it should be. » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 4%
High»17 80%
Too high»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- Perfect! I expected a lot! And got a lot!!» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»10 50%
Excellent»10 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- I have learned so much practical knowledge ans tools that can be applied in real life situtations » (Excellent)
- The focus on learning-by-doing is great.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Group assignments and individual business plan»
- Investor negotiations»
- The BP, and negotiations with VC"c and lawers!»
- The simulations with investors, lawyers etc. The different cases.»
- The negotiation with lawyers and investors, and the shreholders agreement»
- The general structure. The assignments were really good and I learned a lot. »
- The group work tasks»
- The Lectures.»
- Investor presentation»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- thorough feedback and one excellent example that students can learn from»
- More presentation, presentation training. As well as at least one lecture on market analysis»
- More feedback would be good!»
- Maybe we can switch groups when we are working in class. The reason to get some variation since we are working so much in our project groups anyway.»
- Give a better chance to consult the idea provider»
- Details around hand-ins should be communicated more clearly. It"s ok if the "overall goals" of an assignment are unclear (as this could be part of the learning), but things like deadlines, schedule and hand-in format details should be more clear than they have been. »
- Availability of information relevant for the projects»
- Less group work.»
- Make the grading criterias clearer, perhaps reassess the order of the assignments»
- A group assignment including assessment of the market would have been really helpful when writing the business plan.»
- the friday seminars»
- Maybe clearer communication of assignments content. Change the assignmentsweek to sync with when we are reading about the different chapters in DTIM. »

16. Additional comments

- Good job TBE team!»
- I am very happy with the course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från