ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Introduction to microwave and photonics engineering, MCC035, MPMPE,HT2007

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-10-12 - 2007-11-05
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: Lena Peterson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 30%
Around 20 hours/week»4 30%
Around 25 hours/week»5 38%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 15%
75%»5 38%
100%»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Föreläsningar där föreläsaren bara läser innantill från OH är meningslösa.» (75%)
- it is actually more than 80% » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 61%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It is very negative that there are no recomended problems on the photonics part.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 25%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 75%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 53%
Yes, definitely»2 15%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Didn"t really know what was expected from me.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»2 15%
Some extent»6 46%
Large extent»4 30%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- Hans could do something else but to read from his slides, Sheila could have a little more complicated level of her lectures.» (Some extent)

7. Was the system with MUD Cards useful for your learning?

13 svarande

Very useful»1 7%
Useful»7 53%
Rather useful»4 30%
Useless»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»6 46%
Large extent»5 38%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»2 15%
Rather well»6 46%
Very well»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It would have been better if there had been no binder and instead just put all the PowerPionts on the homepage. That way we could print only the good parts. The lab booking could have been done in Studieportalen instead.» (Rather well)
- It had been better if handouts we bought were delivered directly at DC when you paid. As it was now, you didn"t get all copies if you weren"t present at every lecture.» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 15%
Rather good»4 30%
Very good»7 53%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Very helpful teachers.» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 23%
Rather well»4 30%
Very well»6 46%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

12. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 23%
Adequate»7 53%
High»3 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

13. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 15%
Adequate»9 69%
High»1 7%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 15%
Adequate»8 61%
Good»2 15%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- It seems cobbled together and not very thought trough.» (Adequate)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- MUD cards»
- In photonic part, it is better to penetrate to more details. »
- Sheila. Hans has a very good organisation of his part of the course. Good excercises by Hoosein! Hossein is great! And I could prepare for the microwave part of the exam. »
- The Microwave part.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- En dugga hade varit trevligt, så man får lite känsla för vad tentan kommer handla om.»
- More example in the microwave part (smith chart etc)»
- Hans should improve his teaching. Sheila should prepare us for the exam better, recommending problems is an excellent way.»

17. Additional comments

- Sheila is a good lecturer. Hans not very so.»
- I think Sheila"s lectures didn"t really covered what appeared on the exam. The lectures was more of "popular science". I want more formulas and calculations so I can be better prepared for the exam! Hans" lectures strictly followed the powerpoint slides. It"s no use to say exactly the same as on the slides. That we can read by ourselves. »
- The over all course was very good.I have learnt alot. A bit problem i have faced was in photonics part. Because the question in exams in photonics part were difficult than what we have learnt in lectures. I think in lectures there should emphasize on mathimatical part also so that we could understand that how we can use different formulas.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från