ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Applied ICM (GS)

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-10 - 2010-12-17
Antal svar: 2
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 15%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

2 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 50%
At least 35 hours/week»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- 30 h for this course, i.e. more than full-time since the group project was so interesting» (Around 30 hours/week)
- In reality it was around 50h/week all in all» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

2 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- Close to 100%» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

2 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

2 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Applied ICM projects were great but Andrew"s examination was testing logic and reasoning. It is "dumbing down" of things and I think that students should come to M.Sc. education already having such skills. ProSun patent strategy case was so much more "Applied" than Oferion"s case this fall. Nevertheless, it was a great exercise ("go lean" way).» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

2 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

- This fall was about figuring things on our own and in groups. I learned a lot this way, not letting teachers interfere with my education :)» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

2 svarande

Small extent»1 50%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

2 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 50%
Very well»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Perhaps a common platform could have made it even easier for us to communicate, but otherwise really good» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

2 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»2 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Opportinities of asking questions were very good but we didn"t like the answers so we set on to figure things out on our own.» (Very good)
- Quick responses on e-mails, especially when the question was regarding hand-ins» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

2 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 50%
Very well»1 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- We had one person in our group with a really bad attitude that also said several times that he was not interested in the group project or to put time into working together. However he still questioned the way that the rest of the group did the work and a lot of time was spent on first to explain to him what the lectures he missed addressed and argue for why we where working according to these. This took a lot of energy from the group and I would have wished that there could be some way to exclude students like this from the group work. The situation helps to teach the other group members how to handle the situation that might occur in "real life" but I would like to argue that this person shouldn"t have been part of a group working in "real life" either. As much as I appreciate the opportunity to handle group conflicts I would have liked to be able to put more energy and time into apply the theory we have learned from this and previous semesters at ICM. » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It was ok, there were always things to do, but if you set limits, it is manageable.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»2 100%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- High, but with a really good output» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- It"s needed.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Applied ICM projects, Andrew"s case has to be thought through even though the content is great. As I said, it tests logic and reasoning, perhaps the same results can be accomplished in a few workshops or two assignments (shorter timeframe).. »
- The entire course, for me it"s like the last piece of the puzzle to fully understand the concepts and theories we have been taught during the previous semesters. Invaluable. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Bring Tobias, Erik, Henrik for lecturing and projects. Honestly.»
- Perhaps call the project group leaders from CIP PS for coaches instead, let the lectures be more like seminars where we also can learn from the other project groups experiences in relation to the subject of the day and be harder with students that don"t live up to the expectations and deadlines. E.g. if all lessons are to be mandatory, don"t let the students who"s not there get away without an extra assignment. Especially not with the motivation used by the course leaders that our class has done such a great job on the group projects, because it"s not the persons not being at the lecture that have contributed to those good group projects. »

16. Additional comments

- I don"t know what Gregory was doing in this course. Reading from slides about corporate finance which we can freely access ourselves? Then rhetorics about applied projects. It seems like he uses IIE for expanding his network vs adding value for students and staff. No substance in teaching. That is why I would prefer to have lectures from Henrik, Tobias or Erik.»
- Great course, at the right time in the education. Could be even better if more high-tech projects from Chalmers could be incorporated so that it"s not (almost) all life science. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från