Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

HT10 Classification and regulation, SJO246

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-09 - 2011-01-09
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Rask»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 45%
Around 20 hours/week»3 27%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»3 27%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 9%
50%»4 36%
75%»2 18%
100%»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Sometimes preventet from coming to class due to work.» (75%)
- Very interesting external lecturers» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 54%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The goals are very reasonable but the time Chalmers have set aside to this course in combination with other courses is to short to do a proper work.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»3 27%
To some extent»2 18%
Yes, definitely»6 54%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- some of the course literature is outdated, new rules and regulations are coming in every year, so it would be good if these can be updated to the latest version.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»2 18%
Rather badly»1 9%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Would appreciate clearer organization on pingpong» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»5 45%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- i always got help from Sami when I needed, as well as from ALL the guest lecturers.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 18%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»6 54%
I did not seek cooperation»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 90%
High»1 10%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Perfect workload, no more no less.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 54%
High»4 36%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- I studied Port Management and Classification in this study period. Together, the workload was balanced. Perfect!» (Adequate)
- there was one course human factors from 1sts tudy period that over lapped into the 2nd study period and hence 3 courses together.» (High)
- When you should combinate work and studying which i have understand that this program shall be fitted for the work load during this period is to high.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»2 18%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Some of the guest lectures»
- The external lecturers»
- the course structure, and its aims/goals»
- the guests professor invitated. they were really helpful with the course goes»
- ALL the guest lecturers, including the Superintendent lecture. Also, all the weekly assignments. ALL perfect, no more no less!»
- Lot of good lecturers, great input from "the real world"»
- The lectures. They were really great, especially the ones about classification.»
- the overall contence of the course, guest lectures etc.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The teacher should be more involved and give more guidance especially with consideration to the project work.»
- the course material, documents some are outdated.»
- maybe professor could give more lectures»
- Update the information of the Powerpoint lectures. Some info was too old. Also, a lot of the information needed to answer the assignments were not in the powerpoints.»
- More guidance on what is expected on the project work.»
- The task. It was really bad, I learnt nothing and I did not feel I got any understanding for what I really did. The task is mainly for the students working as engineers, and since that is not everyone, or even half of the students, it was not really good. I had a really hard time with it, not because I have trouble studying or writing but because I had no clue what so ever what I was doing. »
- the time span that the course have, it is not good in my oppinion to run an intressting course like this with to much interferance of other courses.»

16. Additional comments

- Very unclear goals and instructions Course only for enginers, no nautical input at all»
- very good course considering the wide variety of guest lecturers. very helpful and informative»
- Change grades! I don"t like the Pass/Fail system. It is better to grade our work with 3,4,5 (more motivating to do a better work, and a 5 looks better on the CV than a pass/fail...). Best regards, Ana»
- I would prefer a task that had more to do with the lectures, less with engines or technique. Something optional that could suit everyone, no matter what you study. Maybe three different taskt depending on you subject of interest.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från