Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Semiconductor devices, MKM135, MPMIC, HT2010, MKM135
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-12-08 - 2011-01-23 Antal svar: 4 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.4 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 25% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 50% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 25% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 4 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 3 | | 75% |
100%» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?4 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 25% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.4 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 3 | | 75% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.25 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?4 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 25% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?4 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?4 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?4 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?4 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 25% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 25% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 11. How was the course workload?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
High» | | 3 | | 75% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - The assignments were the only problem.» (Too high)
12. How was the total workload this study period?4 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
High» | | 4 | | 100% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 75% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Everything except the assignments.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The assignments»
- more tutorial sections»
16. Additional comments- Assignments!!!»
Course specific questions17. Time spent on home assignments*Give a best estimate of how much time you spent solving each of the home assignments.Matrisfråga Home assignment 1 - pn-diode* 4 svarande
0-4 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
4-8 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
8-12 h» | | 2 | | 50% |
12-16 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
16-20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
>20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 Home assignment 2 - MOSFET* 4 svarande
0-4 h» | | 2 | | 50% |
4-8 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
8-12 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
12-16 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
16-20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
>20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.25 Home assignment 3 - BJT* 4 svarande
0-4 h» | | 2 | | 50% |
4-8 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
8-12 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
12-16 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
16-20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
>20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 Home assignment 4 - Photonics* 4 svarande
0-4 h» | | 2 | | 50% |
4-8 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
8-12 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
12-16 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
16-20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
>20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 Home assignment 5 - HF-devices* 4 svarande
0-4 h» | | 3 | | 75% |
4-8 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
8-12 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
12-16 h» | | 1 | | 25% |
16-20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
>20 h» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.75 18. How did you work with the home assignments*Choose the most fitting alternativeMatrisfråga Home assignment 1 - pn-diode* 4 svarande
On my own» | | 4 | | 100% |
On my own but in some dialogue with colleagues» | | 0 | | 0% |
Together with one colleague» | | 0 | | 0% |
In a group of students» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 Home assignment 2 - MOSFET* 4 svarande
On my own» | | 3 | | 75% |
On my own but in some dialogue with colleagues» | | 1 | | 25% |
Together with one colleague» | | 0 | | 0% |
In a group of students» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 Home assignment 3 - BJT* 4 svarande
On my own» | | 3 | | 75% |
On my own but in some dialogue with colleagues» | | 1 | | 25% |
Together with one colleague» | | 0 | | 0% |
In a group of students» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 Home assignment 4 - Photonics* 4 svarande
On my own» | | 3 | | 75% |
On my own but in some dialogue with colleagues» | | 1 | | 25% |
Together with one colleague» | | 0 | | 0% |
In a group of students» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 Home assignment 5 - HF-devices* 4 svarande
On my own» | | 3 | | 75% |
On my own but in some dialogue with colleagues» | | 1 | | 25% |
Together with one colleague» | | 0 | | 0% |
In a group of students» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 19. Guest lecture*How important do you find the guest lecture to be?4 svarande
Can be omitted without loss» | | 0 | | 0% |
Interesting, but not very important» | | 0 | | 0% |
Clearly valuable» | | 4 | | 100% |
One of the most important parts of the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 20. Mid-term course evaluation*Per Lundgren held an evaluation session a few weeks into the course, when you had the opportunity to express your opinions. To what extent do you feel that this made a difference in the course?4 svarande
This was a waste of time» | | 0 | | 0% |
It made no difference» | | 1 | | 25% |
Lead to partial improvements» | | 3 | | 75% |
This improved the course in most aspects» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 21. Project*What is your opinion regarding the arrangement of the project, in particular concerning the inclusion in the course of the material you presented.- It was very good, you learn about something new.»
- very good»
- It is encouraging that the material is used in the course. »
- the project connect very well with the course. It helps me to understand more clear of the curse after the project »
* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|