Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Platform Development and Modularization Management, TEK020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-08 - 2010-12-22
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Persson (Teknikens ekon»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 15%
Around 20 hours/week»4 30%
Around 25 hours/week»5 38%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

- Hard to say.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Good work load! Interesting parts with seminars and topic report!» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 23%
100%»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.76

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 23%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 76%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Goal 1: A bit unclear what solid means but otherwise it is understandable. Goal 2: Hard to understand. Goal 3: Clear» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 91%
No, the goals are set too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- Almost to low.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- Goal 3 seems a bit unrealistic. I feel that I have gained more of a general understanding and not so specific that I can directly use it in a company.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 30%
Yes, definitely»9 69%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

- The semianars tested some knowledge, otherwise it was hard to show what each individual had learned.» (To some extent)
- Good variations of the types of examinations» (Yes, definitely)
- I liked the system where you collected goals during the course, it seems to be a fair system. However, the seminar group was too large and I thought it was impossible to get the points that I was aiming for. Some students always raised there hand"s while others just said it right out and "stole" our points.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Comments later» (Some extent)
- The Volvo 3P guest lecture was very pedagogical and put the subject in a real setting. The Tetra Pak lecture was a bit less pedagogical and harder to directly fit to the subject. The regular lectures were good and provided opportunity for questions. Maximilian"s lecture was a bit too complex and he himself had hard times explaining his ideas.» (Large extent)
- Good teaching! The literature seminars and topic report gave good extra input.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Having seminars with questions and discussion works great.» (Large extent)
- The articles gave good insight into the subject and some were better than others. » (Large extent)
- Some of the articles was too similar» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 7%
Very well»12 92%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- The articles could have been on the course webpage» (Rather well)
- Everything was clear on what we were soupposed to do and everything was easy to upload and all information was available in the PM.» (Very well)
- Good that you posted the result of the seminar at an early stage» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»7 53%
Very good»5 38%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 23%
Very well»9 69%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- I ended up in a malfunctioning group with very low ambitions.» (Very poorly)
- good that we get to chose our groups ourselves, thereby we chose students with the same lavel of ambition.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»10 76%
High»2 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 15%
High»7 53%
Too high»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- The project management course parallel to this one was really massive.» (High)
- I took the Project Management course as well and that course has too high work load!» (Too high)
- Because of the other course, that took a lot of time!» (Too high)
- Unfortunately the project management course which many of the qom students did in parallel required a lot of our time with the effect that the P&M course was "put in the dark"» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What do you think about Magnus Persson"s lectures

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»1 7%
Good»8 61%
Very good»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- Almost half of the lectures were repetition. It would have helped me more if these could have been held in one lecture or handed out. » (Good)
- Good question-asking climate but for me it was a bit too much repetition.» (Good)

14. What do you think about Maximilian Pasche"s lecture

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 8%
OK»2 16%
Good»6 50%
Very good»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

- had a deadline comming up and unfortunately I did not attend the lecture, I heard that it was really interesting so it would be good if it could be scheduled earlier in the course» (?)
- I was more confused afterwards.» (Poor)
- Did not attend, got the impression that it was similar to the guest lectures and focused on the case instead. However from what others that did attend said, it was a good lecture.» (OK)

15. What do you think about Fredrik von Corswant"s (Volvo Trucks) guest lecture

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»6 46%
Very good»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.53

- Interesting since they worked very much with what this course was about. Also easy to follow» (Good)
- Pedagogical and in line with the subject.» (Very good)

16. What do you think about Kent Severinsson"s (Tetra Pak) guest lecture

13 svarande

Very good»3 23%
Good»5 38%
OK»2 15%
Poor»3 23%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- Hard to follow the modularization and platform benefits since they don"t have that many parts in their products. It was also very hard to know when he was talking about the packages or the machines.» (Poor)
- Not so easy to connect to the subject and it was a bit hard to grasp all concepts and names.» (Poor)

17. Compared with this year"s course, I would prefer to have:


- I really enjoyed the work load! »
- Maybe have a small test upon the basic knowledge of the topic in the beginning of the the study period.»
- With lectures I once again mean, less repetitive lectures and more new. The number of lectures are good.»
- perfect!»
- Smaller groups at the seminars, more appropriate to have two groups at the time, three groups gets too crowded»

13 svarande

Much more»1 7%
More»2 15%
Same»10 76%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

Guest lectures
13 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»1 7%
Same»12 92%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

Literature seminars
13 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»0 0%
Same»12 92%
Less»0 0%
Much less»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

Group work
13 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»0 0%
Same»13 100%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

18. I think that the weights given to the different parts in the course assessment should:


- Maybe as I mentioned in the previous question, have a short basic test early in the course of 15-20 points, and thereby decrease the points for literature seminars with 5-10 points and 10 points for the report.»
- Good and also very well described in the course PM so there were no surprises. »
- The course should contain some exams like Dugga.»

Topic reports (currently 50 out of 100 points)
13 svarande

Increase»1 7%
Stay the same»11 84%
Decrease»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2

Literature seminars (currently 40 out of 100 points)
13 svarande

Increase»0 0%
Stay the same»9 69%
Decrease»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

Individual reflection about the guest lectures (currently 10 out of 100 points)
13 svarande

Increase»0 0%
Stay the same»13 100%
Decrease»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

19. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»6 46%
Excellent»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

- I found myself always referring to modular organizations in other courses. » (Excellent)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The seminars and group work. It was also good that the headings were set so that they were all within the scope of the course.»
- The seminars.»
- Most of the stuff»
- Seminares»
- the whole course and how it is done»
- Seminars»
- Volvo Guest Lecture!!! »

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The content of the four first lectures»
- Put more pressure on groups to prepare discussion topics in advance so that the quality of the seminars increases.»
- The seminars should be in smaller groups and a bit more controlled. »
- »
- the seminars. fewer people or no seminars. »
- seminars, as stated above. More lectures with magnus»

22. Additional comments

- Interesting topic that is easy to apply straight from the course. The structure of the course was also very good.»
- Thank you for a good crash course in platform and modularization knowledge.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från