ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Foundations for Photonics Engineering, MCC045, MPMPE, HT2010, MCC045

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-08 - 2011-01-23
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 20%

Around 20 hours/week» 3 30%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 20%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 10%

At least 35 hours/week» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 2 20%

100%» 8 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 20%

The goals are difficult to understand» 4 40%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 3 30%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 16%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 5 83%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all» 2 25%

To some extent» 3 37%

Yes, definitely» 1 12%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- Good questions with focus on understanding and not too much calculations. Suitable for the course with good coverage of the content.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 3 30%

Some extent» 4 40%

Large extent» 2 20%

Great extent» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- The lectures (I exclude here the tutorials) are basically a reading of the slides and therefore of little help for learning purposes.» (Small extent)
- The class was given in a slow manner and it was difficult to get the idea at the end.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 5 50%

Large extent» 5 50%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Regarding the home assignments, almost all information had to be taken from Hoecht"s "Optics" instead of the course text book.» (Some extent)
- The Saleh and Teich book is good. There were many examples that were taken from other books and they should be included in the course literature too as optional literature.» (Large extent)
- The course book by Saleh-Teich is easy to read and understand.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly» 1 10%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 7 70%

Very well» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor» 1 10%

Rather poor» 2 20%

Rather good» 2 20%

Very good» 5 50%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- The lecturer encouraged us to ask for help. However, he seldom answered our questions once we asked them. » (Rather poor)
- The tutorials were quite good. It would be nice to have more tutorials in the course.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 10%

Rather well» 2 20%

Very well» 6 60%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 4 40%

High» 4 40%

Too high» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- The homeassignment were too large for the available time that we had for them to be delivered. 4 problems per week seems like a lot. Instead of having several short problems one or two large problems per week would be better.» (High)
- There were too many home assignments. The number was not the problem but the fact that they had very little to do with what we had reviewed in class. It was much more about reading through Hoecht looking for the exact equation than applying what had been taught in class. » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 20%

High» 4 40%

Too high» 4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- The other course (Foundations for Microwaves) took to much time.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor» 2 20%

Fair» 2 20%

Adequate» 4 40%

Good» 2 20%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- My general impression about this course is that the teacher puts extremely little effort in it, despite it is clearly a demanding one and that fact is reflected in the exam. For example, the teacher is of little help in the home assignments, as he simply uses previous years" and it is the assistant who corrects them, meaning that the teacher seems not to have a clue about the questions that he asks us. » (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Giving the slides before the class was good. The lab was very fun and good.»
- Home assignments. »
- The lab. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Provide old exams a couple of weeks before the exam would be very appreciated.»
- The home assignments were extremely difficult. It was almost impossible to solve them with Saleh Teich. I used Hecht. Moreover there were a lot of problems per home assignment. Most of these problems were not mentioned in the lectures at all.»
- More clear and well-organized home assignment»
- Add more tutorials, use more the whiteboard instead of just reading the slides, do not just re-use past years" home assignments or, if you do, at least read them to know what they are about.»

16. Additional comments

- Maybe the intention is to broaden the knowledge with the HA:s, otherwise some questions could be changed to better fit into to "ordinary" problems in the course. Since a lot of time is spent on the HA:s I think it is important they give "relevant" knowledge.»
- »

Kursutvärderingssystem från