ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

2010/2011 Sequence bioinformatics, UMF018

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-06 - 2011-01-21
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Graham Kemp»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 25%
Around 20 hours/week»3 75%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Usually I just read the syllabus for courses that not mandatory. This one is mandatory for Bioinformatics.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- When reading the goals after taking the course they now seem much clearer. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 50%
Yes, definitely»1 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The standard written exam is generally a poor way to assess knowledge and skills. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»3 75%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The Perl material was great! However, it would have been good to have the recommended chapters for the textbook used.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Some material was only available on paper. Two of the HMM exercises I got only because someone emailed me a photo of the paper she had got from a third person. » (Rather well)
- Sometimes we did not had handouts before the lecture, but most of the time is was there.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 25%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»2 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Varied greatly. During labs it was rather good. » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»1 25%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»1 25%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 50%
High»1 25%
Too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 75%
Excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- The course feels fragmented. (Possible synergies are left as an exercise for the reader.)» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Perl lectures and the project were great! Also the lecture about gene prediction. »
- programming experience. building a toolset to work with databases for useful tasks. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- For the group project, I belive we should be allowed to choose either the topic to work on or the groupmates. »
- More (and newer) example exams. For many reasons. They form the weighted and true version of the course goals. »

16. Additional comments

- It would be good to have the HMM mre applied. The lectures were very good, but we could have had some more applications or practical, maybe some paper to read.»
- HMMs are tought theoretically but not really put to use. Exam was too much material for the set time. I knew answers to questions that I did not have time to answer. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från