|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Digital communications, SSY125, H10Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-12-06 - 2011-01-03 Antal svar: 20 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 51% Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - Project workload is imbalanced over the duration of the course.» (Around 25 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.55 - Tried to reach 100% percent of the lecture. Impossible because of collisions. Missing lectures is not good at all.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.17 - There were many things to study, they were more than reasonable amount.» (No, the goals are set too high) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.68 Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - the teaching method was pretty fine.
but you should be more friendly in the classroom.» (Large extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - I inly used the lecture notes, the course book I only looked at a few times.» (Large extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - the classroom climate was bit restrictive.» (Rather good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - Searching an own group for the project would be great.» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.95 - you should the teaching method of tutorial session.» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.26 - Since the other course (Applied Signal Processing) also has a very high work load, to total workload became to much and at least 2 days a week you had to be at Chalmers at least between 08:00-23:00 and sometimes longer. Which makes it almost impossible to have any spare time.» (Too high) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - well, it"s basic course of my field, so the overall experience was good.» (Good) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Project»- The book» - well, course instructor with his teaching method is fine.» - I liked the quiz, and the project was good, but it would have been nice if we actually would send some audio through a channel so we saw that it works in real life.» - Projects, quiz and tutorials » - Quiz, Two lecture reviews, tutorials, one project» - Project and small quizs should be preserved.» - lectures plan» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The project, the teaching in Lecture & Tutorial , and both TA !»- Schedule of the tutorial sessions» - The TA, Rajet. Description of the project, and gaols of that.» - well, you should be more friendly during the course and you should change the method of work doing in tutorial session.» - When having the oral exam, instead of having the other group members being absolute quiet I think it would work if you could have a discussion instead of just answering the questions. Like that the teacher gives the question to on member but if he doesn"t know the answer or just half the answer the other should be able to fill in.» - the project memo must be made clearer» - tutorial Answers should be posted in the web for every alternative weekends.» - the task of the project could be formulated more clearly» - Rajet Krishnan should be changed as TA, most of students complained about his performance.» 16. Additional comments- It was too much material. TA and Examinator did not have very good synchronization, The Project was not clear, it was too less information about it, and no help from the projectleadr. One was more confused after asking the TA. »- The most disturbing part of this course was the TA who was responsible of the project,Rajet Krishnan. He could just make some wrong comments and reduce our point at last.» - well, no comments.» - during the lecture, some more examples may help to understand the theory better.» - great thanks to Henk Wymeersch»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10%