Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Digital communications, SSY125, H10

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-06 - 2011-01-03
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 51%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 10%
Around 20 hours/week»5 25%
Around 25 hours/week»4 20%
Around 30 hours/week»7 35%
At least 35 hours/week»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Project workload is imbalanced over the duration of the course.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 10%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 15%
100%»15 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- Tried to reach 100% percent of the lecture. Impossible because of collisions. Missing lectures is not good at all.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 15%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 35%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 82%
No, the goals are set too high»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.17

- There were many things to study, they were more than reasonable amount.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

19 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»7 36%
Yes, definitely»8 42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»1 5%
Large extent»12 60%
Great extent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- the teaching method was pretty fine. but you should be more friendly in the classroom.» (Large extent)
- Very good with the lecture notes.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»6 30%
Large extent»9 45%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- I inly used the lecture notes, the course book I only looked at a few times.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 21%
Rather well»15 78%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»8 40%
Very good»10 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- the classroom climate was bit restrictive.» (Rather good)
- Getting help from the teacher (Hank) was good, and he always helped. But for the TA"s it was sadly not the same. The answers that were given was often unclear.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 10%
Rather well»8 40%
Very well»10 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Searching an own group for the project would be great.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»6 30%
High»6 30%
Too high»7 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- you should the teaching method of tutorial session.» (Adequate)
- Both project and tutorials are to much» (Too high)
- The project was really big and since we had a group member that didn"t do anything we had to put extra time to cover for his part which made the workload even higher. And the tutorial problems were to many each week, and sometimes the problems was on stuff that we hadn"t talked about during the lectures. And that the tutorial problems came often very late so if you weren"t free during the weekend you were not able to finish them before Monday morning. » (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 21%
High»6 31%
Too high»9 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- Since the other course (Applied Signal Processing) also has a very high work load, to total workload became to much and at least 2 days a week you had to be at Chalmers at least between 08:00-23:00 and sometimes longer. Which makes it almost impossible to have any spare time.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 15%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»15 75%
Excellent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- well, it"s basic course of my field, so the overall experience was good.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Project»
- The book»
- well, course instructor with his teaching method is fine.»
- I liked the quiz, and the project was good, but it would have been nice if we actually would send some audio through a channel so we saw that it works in real life.»
- Projects, quiz and tutorials »
- Quiz, Two lecture reviews, tutorials, one project»
- Project and small quizs should be preserved.»
- lectures plan»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The project, the teaching in Lecture & Tutorial , and both TA !»
- Schedule of the tutorial sessions»
- The TA, Rajet. Description of the project, and gaols of that.»
- well, you should be more friendly during the course and you should change the method of work doing in tutorial session.»
- When having the oral exam, instead of having the other group members being absolute quiet I think it would work if you could have a discussion instead of just answering the questions. Like that the teacher gives the question to on member but if he doesn"t know the answer or just half the answer the other should be able to fill in.»
- the project memo must be made clearer»
- tutorial Answers should be posted in the web for every alternative weekends.»
- the task of the project could be formulated more clearly»
- Rajet Krishnan should be changed as TA, most of students complained about his performance.»

16. Additional comments

- It was too much material. TA and Examinator did not have very good synchronization, The Project was not clear, it was too less information about it, and no help from the projectleadr. One was more confused after asking the TA. »
- The most disturbing part of this course was the TA who was responsible of the project,Rajet Krishnan. He could just make some wrong comments and reduce our point at last.»
- well, no comments.»
- during the lecture, some more examples may help to understand the theory better.»
- great thanks to Henk Wymeersch»

Kursutvärderingssystem från