Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Simulation engines, Lp2 ht10, TDA571 / DIT031

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-10 - 2010-12-17
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 29%
Kontaktperson: Victoria E»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 9%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»4 36%
Around 30 hours/week»2 18%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

11 svarande

0%»1 9%
25%»2 18%
50%»3 27%
75%»2 18%
100%»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 36%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 45%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 14%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 28%
No, the goals are set too high»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»2 18%
To some extent»1 9%
Yes, definitely»3 27%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 54%

- I thought it was hard to understand the goals, the aim of the course.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»8 72%
To some extent»2 18%
Large extent»1 9%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.36

- The lectures were very brief. And they should take place in the very beginning of the course.» (Small extent)
- Lectures are on a much more simple level than the coding» (Small extent)
- It wasn"t really the teaching that tought us anything, it was more of a self learning course.» (Small extent)
- Could have been more practical to make the coding easier, but that would be very much to go through.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»10 90%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.09

- Have not read any book, and it was hard to find solutions to problems online.» (Small extent)
- I can"t even remember the name of the course book.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»1 9%
Rather badly»1 9%
Rather well»7 63%
Very well»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Hand ins are too complicated!» (Very badly)
- Some old inaccurate information» (Rather badly)
- I like the Twitter!» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»1 9%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»4 36%
I did not seek help»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- We had supervision once every week, very good!» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 27%
Rather well»5 45%
Very well»3 27%
I did not seek coopeation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Not because the others weren"t nice but we all read different courses, had different priorities and didn"t communicate that well.» (Rather poorly)
- Could have been better, but it was hard since everyone had their own area.» (Rather well)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- The course has a very broad content. At each lecture, we are presented many different topics, overally. I dont know if this style is good or bad but it is definite that we dont get any detailed information from the lectures. We only get a general knowledge about many simulation engine topics, and we spent many days trying to search OGRE inefficiently.» (Fair)
- Very interesting and fun course, but it took way too long to get Ogre3D to work. I think you should consider using a more well documented engine/framework instead, e.g. XNA.» (Good)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project»
- The project!»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Have the lectures earlier in the course Be more specific as to the abstraction level of the engine»
- There must be some tutorials provided by the lecturer. We have spent 2 weeks to get familiar with ogre framework. The only help we had was google and that was very difficult and not effective. If there would be some tutorials about ogre, we can quickly focus on our project implementation, which we supposed to implement.»
- Have more lectures at the beginning, since you have the last introducing lectures when you"re supposed to be almost finished with the project. It"s better to have most of the lectures during the first 2-3 weeks and then only have supervisions to check the progress.»
- Lectures, Hand-in procedures.»
- The lectures should be placed in the beginning of the course. »
- Maybe concentrate lectures to the start of the period»
- Maybe talk a little more about Ogre in the lectures, not just listing different libraries that can be useful. For example, many of the libraries that was mentioned, we couldn"t use because of licensing issues.»

14. Additional comments

- Just stop giving this class, or at the very least let someone who cares teach it.»
- The course is too long. There shouldn"t be a deadline in january. Having a deadline in january means that the course, including both the project and the report, is to heavy to handle in 7 weeks.»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från