ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Aesthetics of interaction Lp2 ht10, DAT155 / DIT820

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-10 - 2010-12-17
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 24%
Kontaktperson: Victoria E»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 0 0%

Around 20 hours/week» 1 16%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 50%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 16%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

6 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 0 0%

100%» 6 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.16

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 0 0%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 0 0%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 6 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 5 83%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 2 33%

Yes, definitely» 4 66%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

To some extent» 1 16%

Large extent» 1 16%

Great extent» 4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Much was up to yourself, but there was always help to nudge you in a good direction.» (Large extent)
- Sus is always on a roll :) A lot of energy, loads of examples given to support the theoretical part.» (Great extent)
- Very good supervision and lectures» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 33%

Large extent» 3 50%

Great extent» 1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Useful and interesting papers» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 1 16%

Very well» 5 83%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- One place to find stuff. Google calendar would be better next time for schedule.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 0 0%

Very good» 6 100%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Feedback was constantly provided and it was always very thorough.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 1 16%

Very well» 5 83%

I did not seek coopeation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- Some variance in engagement, but overall good.» (Rather well)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 3 50%

Excellent» 3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Too heavy» (Good)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Sus ftw!»
- The facebook exercise! (well I would say all the exercises, but the facebook exercise was the best).»
- Feedback sessions»
- Feedback sessions were really nice. »
- The exercises, and particularly that you could choose between two some weeks. And the feedback session were really good, contributed a lot.»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The exercise took quite a bit of time. The literature as well was very demanding. Maybe the workload should be decreased just a little, or have the deadlines set strictly at the end of school hours.»
- The amount of work on the portfolio is quite substantial. As work on the portfolio is encouraged in the last few weeks, when there are other exams and deadlines, it feels really stressful. Perhaps lower the amount of work on it a bit, so the quality of the the other parts are much better. For example instead of 3 old/new exercises, just do two (and of course the animal transfer and the paper).»
- More clear on the work for exercises.»
- The grading has to be changed. To be asked to do 7 well made exercises and not get any grading for this at all is not reasonable. Especially since the portofolio can contain other exercises we havent done. What is wrong by having what you did during the course as contents for the portfolio? Especially since you got points for doing the litterature sessions but not the exercises. It should only be the essay and animal expression left for the last pieces.»
- I would have like more organized group discussions regarding some of the literature, similar to the exercise feedback sessions.»

14. Additional comments

- Interesting and a good course. The workload is high and would be reasonable if it werent that we had to almost redo everything for the final portfolio. Make the things we do during the course count.»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.16
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från