Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Parallel and distributed real-time systems, Lp2 HT10, EDA421 / DIT171

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-07 - 2010-12-17
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Victoria E»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 7%
Around 20 hours/week»6 46%
Around 25 hours/week»3 23%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.84 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»3 23%
75%»3 23%
100%»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 8%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 8%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»1 7%
Yes, definitely»8 61%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

- Very well-balanced exam» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
To some extent»1 7%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I did not attend all the lectures because of personally reasons. But the lecturer is really good.» (Large extent)
- The professor has a very deep knowledge about the subject and he explained it well, also his communication with the students is great. He is the best professor i have ever seen in this university.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»3 23%
Large extent»5 38%
Great extent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- the book is really hard to understand.» (Some extent)
- The slides provided most of the data for the exam. The other litterature was not great in explaining things, but it was not really bad either. It gave a good undestanding for most of the assignments.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»1 7%
Very well»11 84%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- The webpage is great and updated on time. » (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 23%
Very good»10 76%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Thanks to Risat, he helped us everytime and he has a deep knowledge about subject.» (Very good)
- Like in the introductory course, both Jan and Risat are very helpful.» (Very good)
- Examiner explained things well. And the assistant was really helpful and competent.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 30%
Very well»7 53%
I did not seek coopeation»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Anyway, it"s always possible to do the assignments on one"s own.» (Rather well)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»6 46%
Excellent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- because assignments are tough enough.....» (Poor)
- I really enjoyed this course. One of my best.» (Excellent)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- consultant session»
- Almost everything. The grading 60% assignments and 40% exam. The course slides.»
- As far as I have came across, the assignments helped a lot in understanding the course more. Especially going through different papers and grasping as much as possible related to the field. So I am definitely up for the assignments.»
- The lecturer»
- The assignments.»
- The teacher and TA. Both were very pedagogical and easy to understand.»
- the help of the teacher assistant »
- Homework assignments»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- better to add more practical labs»
- I can"t think of something. Maybe the lesson about NP-completeness is a bit complicated, it could be somehow restructured.»
- A better connection between the literature and the lectures. Sometimes it was a bit hard to find what you were looking for to get explanations if there was something that you did not understand during the lectures. It might also be a good idea to release the homework assignments earlier and have the deadlines earlier as well so that the second one is not too close to the exam. A problem might however be that the students possibly lack knowledge early on in the course.»
- Assignments.»
- Perhaps introduce a follow-up course where some of the concepts taught in the course could be implemented in practice.»

14. Additional comments

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.57
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.64

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från