ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Internal Combustion Engines 2010, MTF240

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-02 - 2010-12-20
Antal svar: 29
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 59%
Kontaktperson: Sven Andersson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

29 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 10%
Around 20 hours/week»13 44%
Around 25 hours/week»9 31%
Around 30 hours/week»3 10%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.51

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

29 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»11 37%
100%»18 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.62

- Almost 100%..» (100%)
- i missed maybe two lectures because i was booked somehow. but the lectures were fun and informative, so there was no point in staying away.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

28 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»22 78%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- I don"t remember actually.» (?)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

27 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»26 96%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.03

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

27 svarande

No, not at all»1 3%
To some extent»6 22%
Yes, definitely»20 74%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- The examination did not give equal opportunities to those who took the final exam. Some questions were difficult to understand but most were good.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 6%
Large extent»18 62%
Great extent»9 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

7. What did you think about the different lecturers/teachers?

Matrisfråga

- Mostly due to language barriers.»
- The "ok" is only based on the fact, that compared to sven, arjan and chen maybe have to practice a little to speak infront of (sometimes not listening) students and get there attention back. in this specific task stina and sven were more successful.»

Sven Andersson
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»3 10%
Excellent»26 89%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.89

Arjan Helmantel
29 svarande

Very poor»2 7%
Poor»11 39%
OK»7 25%
Good»7 25%
Excellent»1 3%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.78

Stina Hemdal
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 6%
OK»8 27%
Good»15 51%
Excellent»4 13%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.72

Chen Huang
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»7 25%
OK»13 46%
Good»7 25%
Excellent»1 3%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.07

8. What do you think about the disassembly lab / assignments

Matrisfråga

- Manually inputting power and bscf curves into digital form took a lot of time»
- The assignments were difficult»

Disassembly
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 3%
OK»1 3%
Good»6 20%
Excellent»21 72%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.62

Assignment 1
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 3%
OK»11 37%
Good»12 41%
Excellent»5 17%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.72

Assignment 2
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»12 41%
Good»11 37%
Excellent»6 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.79

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»11 37%
Large extent»14 48%
Great extent»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- the book was very expensive» (Some extent)
- Very good book!» (Large extent)
- heywood is great! and the reading instruction were very helpful not to get lost!» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

29 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 6%
Rather well»21 72%
Very well»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 10%
Very good»26 89%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.89

- Best course I"ve ever studied when it comes to help. I felt that I always was able to go up to you and ask for help.» (Very good)
- most times there was somebody in the departement available and kindly helped out with questions.» (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

29 svarande

Very poorly»1 3%
Rather poorly»2 6%
Rather well»6 20%
Very well»20 68%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Too big difference in ambition and experience between the cultures...» (Rather poorly)

13. How was the course workload?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 6%
Adequate»20 68%
High»5 17%
Too high»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

14. How was the total workload this study period?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 6%
Adequate»17 58%
High»6 20%
Too high»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- It was high but mostly due to the other course I had. This course workload was fair.» (High)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

29 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»4 13%
Good»15 51%
Excellent»9 31%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

- Interesting subject. The course evaluation should have been out a long time ago which is not acceptable. To give it out one week before the next exam period will probably give a misleading result with many people not taking the time to answer or remembering all their opinions, this late people simply don"t care. Also, no midterm meeting!? The openness to get help from Sven, Stina and Chen helped a lot during the course!» (Fair)
- The most interessting course so far. and i guess the favourite subject of most students :)» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- engine disassembly»
- Great Lectures»
- midterm»
- The disassembly lab was excellent. »
- That there is a midterm with the calculation part with possibility to get bonus points for final exam (although it should not be a punishment to not pass, it should be a bonus to pass)»
- the disassembly lab»
- the assembly! maybe it could be extended in some way. and due to the fact that it is a course in the first quarter, it would be great if the workshop could be more pointed out. just a little more commercial...or kicking peoples asses whose are interrested in doing formula later.»
- Sven and the "dugga"»
- Everything! Very fitting course to start with for masters. »
- The course strucuture»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Feedback on assigments.»
- Throw out the talking germans »
- Stupid people talking all the time»
- assignment task 1 should be clearer (how the report should look like -> everybody got a return), better handouts with more structure, an own, up-to-date compendium with the most important information»
- Why presenting the assignments before getting feedback on the reports from the teacher on all of them?!»
- The way the midterm affects the final exam. A student who didn"t pass the midterm should still have the equal rights to exam time, as it is now the midterm is actually a examination part that greatly effects the final grade and should therefore be reported in Ladok separately or be given as a 2h extra sit-in after the original exam. (a 6h exam with no extra bonus points would certainly be enough punishment for those who didn"t pass the midterm for some reason)»
- the book was very expensive and 90% of its content was not needed -> maybe just get some copies of the relevant pages for the students»
- How it works if you miss the "dugga" since I can imagine that it would be nearly impossible to do both parts in 4 h since I spent 4 h on the theoretical part.»
- More guest lectures!! And more topics on latest technologies in ICE»

18. Additional comments

- Awesome course»
- all teachers should be capable of telling people to not interrupt the class with constant talking during lectures (even though it shouldn"t be necessary at university level)»
- the lectures were really fun to attend and I also learned a lot in them»
- thank you!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från