Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Introduction to Nuclear Reactors, TIF215

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-01 - 2010-12-15
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 17%
Kontaktperson: Anders Nordlund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 66%
Around 20 hours/week»2 22%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 11%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

- Too little» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 44%
100%»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- The lectures were good, but unfortunately I couldn"t make it to all of them due to other appointments. » (75%)
- Good teaching but please use the full time or schedule less!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 11%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 88%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 33%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 66%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- Too little contents!!!» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»7 77%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- But too easy» (Yes, definitely)
- But the exam could include more questions, to get a more overview and width of the questions.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Anders is a great lecturer» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»2 22%
Great extent»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 22%
Very well»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

9. How do you percieve the overall pedagogical quality of the course?

9 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Average»0 0%
High»5 55%
Very high»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

- The course is easy, but still Anders attack it in a good, fun way.» (Very high)

10. How was the quality of the part about fusion?

9 svarande

Very low»1 11%
Low»0 0%
Average»1 11%
High»5 55%
Very high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Good, but some stuff were hard to get( interaciton between magnets and fields) for someone who hasn"t studied physics.» (High)

11. How was the quality of the part about safety culture?

9 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Average»3 33%
High»2 22%
Very high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- A bite messy» (Average)
- I understand management problems are important, but it would also have been interesting to learn about the safety systems in use in more detail.» (Average)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 11%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Good answers from Anders!» (Very good)
- Didn"t seek so much help, but when I did I got god help» (Very good)

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 11%
Very well»6 66%
I did not seek cooperation»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

14. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»2 22%
Low»3 33%
Adequate»4 44%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- The course could take up more» (Low)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»4 44%
High»2 22%
Too high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- I mixed courses from Nuclear Engineering and Complex Adaptive Systems, so I cannot comment on the workload for the Nuclear Engineering masters programme.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- Simlpy needs more contents otherwise fine» (Good)
- Good overview, good material, really good lecturer.» (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The good structure»
- the professor»
- the teacher ofcourse!»
- Everything»
- The four-momentum.»
- none»
- the guest lectures and Anders lectures»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The workload (increase!!!)»
- Less hour for Safety Colture and maybe more about Fusion»
- I dont think the fusion part is necessary because we are going to be able and study this course in the third quarter. »
- The workload could be increased.»
- Add a little bit more, maybe some more of how the reactor is constructed, more of the safety features. More of everything I could say.»
- none»
- A harder exam or in some way more testing. There should be some kind of hand-in and/or laboration.»

19. Additional comments

- Great lectures.»
- Thanks for invitation to great EON evening»
- Thank you Anders (and others involved) for a good course!»
- none»
- Good introduction course giving a broad perspective of nuclear fission reactors and many aspects of it.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från