ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Strategic Environmental Assessment, ENM040, MPEMA, Ht10

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-07 - 2011-01-15
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 78%
Kontaktperson: Kathrine Jahnberg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 18%

Around 20 hours/week» 4 36%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 36%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 1 9%

50%» 2 18%

75%» 4 36%

100%» 4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4

- there were a number of conflicts with other courses» (50%)
- Probably more than 75%, but not all.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 18%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 9%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 4 36%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 4 36%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- I think that the policiy part is much larger than the syllabus implies» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 7 70%

No, the goals are set too high» 3 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- The course starts quite much from the experience of students from GU. Some introductions to institutions/policies/economy/politics could be needed.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 2 18%

Yes, definitely» 0 0%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 9 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- I find that to have a course evaluation that is closed before the course is finished and the exam has taken place is extremely unsatisfactory, and it shows that these evaluations and the students" opinions are not taken seriously. » (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 6 54%

Large extent» 3 27%

Great extent» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- for some of the lectures, the context and purpose was not clear (for example the one from the world business council on sustainable development)» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 3 27%

Large extent» 5 45%

Great extent» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Corse litt. oculd be better organized. A compendium with the articles to read structured after dates or lectrues wuld help alot. Clear idea about which books are of importance.» (Some extent)
- Some of the papers were useful, but a lot of them were vague and hard to read.» (Some extent)
- The papers and seminars was an important part of the course and made the concept of SEA more clear.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly» 1 9%

Rather badly» 4 36%

Rather well» 5 45%

Very well» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- Having separate pages for chalmers and GU students has implied that we did not get the same information at the same time. If we are expected to read the course material before a lecture, we actually need to have access to it a day or two before. Also, at one time before a morning seminar, we got an e-mail at 7pm the day before saying pretty much "oops, we didn"t think this through. Some of you will have to show up at 8 am but wait an hour before you can have your seminar". I find this not only poorly administrated, but disrespectful towards the students. Finally, it would have been more efficient if the teachers could have some type of coorination of their lectures. Several of them had an "intro to SEA"-section, which we really only needed once.» (Very badly)
- This must be improved until next year. Some times information reaches the student using GUL and sometimes only study portal on chalmers. There was a lot confusion before the first literature seminar.» (Rather badly)
- Why two web-pages? Can it not be arranged that one of them just links to the other so that all information reaches all students att the same time?» (Rather badly)
- the lecture notes not uploaded before lecture, big minus. Lecturenotes not uploaded directly after lecture very big minus. Also the litt. seminars and articles for them could be beter structured and possible posted so that we don"t have to spend time searching for the texts.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 2 18%

Very good» 8 72%

I did not seek help» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 2 18%

Rather well» 4 36%

Very well» 4 36%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- discussions were usually interesting» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 4 36%

High» 4 36%

Too high» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Sometimes high. around the seminars.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 4 36%

High» 7 63%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- 3 courses» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 2 18%

Adequate» 4 36%

Good» 4 36%

Excellent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- The course tends to get a little vague sometimes.» (Fair)
- a lot of interesting aspects, but the repetitiveness (from lack of coordination of presentation material between teachers) and the lack of administration really lowers my overall impression.» (Adequate)
- Too messy course and too much to read (at lest to unstructured texts hard to grasp what is the essence)» (Adequate)
- Very interesting, but I think that the course content is still more suited for a 15 credits course, and that some further reshaping is needed. It"s possible that the scope is to wide for a 7.5 credit course. » (Good)
- quite hard/different course for us from Chalmers, you feel that you are lacking in basic knowledge that others from GU already have.» (Good)
- This is what I want to work with!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Most of the course contents is good»
- lectures, guestlectures»
- the discussions»
- the literature seminars»
- it should be in the 2nd year»
- The collaborative of two universities and many majors»
- Guest lectures and seminars»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- it would have been easier if the chalmers homepage only contained a link to the GU homepage, or vice versa, than having two different teachers trying to coordinate and provide the same services simultaneously. overall administration needs to be improved, and if teachers could show some respect to the students" limited time and give some heads up when something happens, that would be splendid. »
- shor case studies or examples in classroom. Litterature seminar doesn"t give me anything. maybe a individual paiper on the litterature instead of seminars?»
- lectures should fit in with eachother and their connection should be made clearer»
- it should be in the 2nd year»
- Too much literatures to read»
- There is no need for all the teachers to start with an introduction to SEA. This can be done only once during the course.»

16. Additional comments

- a course evaluation that didn"t end BEFORE the exam has taken place would enable us to actually have an opinion of the entire course. »
- it should be in the 2nd year»
- I know it is a short course, but I miss a possibility to put together at least parts of a SEA as a group project. I also want to add that Anders Ekbom and Daniel Slunge were the best teachers I have had in many years. Thanks for many interesting lectures!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från