Visa resultat

Automotive Engineering Master Programme Evaluation-10, MPAUT

Background

1. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?*

28 svarande

Sweden - Chalmers»		10		35%
Sweden - another university»		0		0%
University outside Sweden»		18		64%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- Ecole de Mines d"Alès» (University outside Sweden)
- Anna University, Chennai, India» (University outside Sweden)

2. What is your opinion on the information about the master programme when you applied?

28 svarande

Poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		4		14%
OK»		7		25%
Good»		11		40%
Very good»		5		18%
I did not seek/need information»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Compared to others Master programme´,s MPAUT was poor. Only rember one rather bad presentation, no posters,. Tried to search on homepage for info but war rather poor also. » (Rather poor)
- Please ensure that you mention the need for matlab in this course. Initially it was hard for me to adapt immediately. Since we do not have matlab in our curriculum, it would be better if you inform ppl about it.» (OK)
- It seemed ok.» (Good)

Your own effort

3. How many hours per week have you spent studying at this programme?

28 svarande

Around 30 hours/week or less»		5		17%
Around 40 hours/week»		12		42%
Around 50 hours/week»		8		28%
Around 60 hours/week or more»		3		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.32

- Quite much work into Formula Student» (Around 60 hours/week or more)
- Too many assignments in all courses!» (Around 60 hours/week or more)

4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

28 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		2		7%
75%»		13		46%
100%»		13		46%

Genomsnitt: 4.39

- Not all but closer to 100 than 75%» (100%)
- 100% of course!» (100%)
- around 85 %» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

5. How understandable are the programme goals?

The goals are difficult to understand»		1		3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		7		25%
The goals are clear enough»		20		71%

Genomsnitt: 2.67

- for example: synthesize and evaluate automotive systems this is too vague, i dont understand it. the rest is understandable after good reading» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- for some courses the goals are not very clear» (The goals are clear enough)

6. Are the goals reasonable for a master degree?

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
No, the goals are a bit too low»		4		14%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		23		82%
No, the goals are a bit high»		0		0%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		3%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- The goals are good enough but improvement is needed for Advanced IC engines course. It mostly discusses the on going research in Chalmers.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

7. Are these goals fulfilled within the group of mandatory courses?

28 svarande

No, not at all»		2		7%
To some extent»		11		39%
Almost»		5		17%
Yes, definitely»		10		35%
I do not know»		0

Genomsnitt: 2.82

- no» (No, not at all)
- The goal "through applications and practice o utilize automotive related IT- and product development tools." Is somewhat fulfilled. I think more focus could be on this part. » (To some extent)
- Lifecycle analysis - Not so much! » (Almost)
- "synthesize and evaluate automotive systems and products in terms of direct use and lifecycle analysis through consideration of environmental and economic aspects" - this is not adequately covered in the mandatory courses.» (Almost)

Programme layout

8. What do you think of the programme layout?

Poor»		1		3%
Rather poor»		3		10%
OK»		6		21%
Good»		14		50%
Very good»		4		14%
No opinion»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- I found that Id missed out on much by not participating in a project during my 1st year. Perhaps more projects can be started in the first year in addition to formula student and eco marathon.» (OK)
- Passive safety should be in the safety track. » (Good)
- The course on Advanced Vehicle Aerodynamics should be offered to more number of students. Currently only 10 students can take that course whereas number of students interested is much higher.» (Good)
- The program has good flexibility, especially while choosing the two electives in the second year.» (Good)
- I would like to have a specialization exclusively for Active and Passive Safety - the main reason - I skipped safety specialization becuz i had to finish Adv.Passive Safety which was full of BIOLOGY ! » (Good)

9. Do the mandatory courses cover the main topics that you believe an Automotive Engineer should know?

No, not at all»		2		7%
To some extent»		6		21%
To a certain extent, yes»		3		10%
To a large extent, but not completely»		11		39%
Yes definitely»		6		21%
No comment»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- I think some knowledge in designing a craschworthy vehicle with regards to stiffness e.t.c. should be teached to a higher extent.» (To a large extent, but not completely)
- I wanted to study some information regarding the manufacturing process as well. We had some but I thought it would be good to have a little more insight on that ! » (To a large extent, but not completely)

10. Do you miss a course or a topic in the master programme?

Yes»		10		38%
No»		16		61%

Genomsnitt: 1.61

- when comparing German universities » (Yes)
- A course on Vehicle Structures and Materials would be good to study.» (Yes)
- CFD and FEA » (Yes)
- you could include a little more about "the anatomy of a car" - a little more detail about the mechanics of, for example, the steering system, the brake system, etc.» (Yes)
- How to actually construct and build a car/engine!» (Yes)
- A good fluids course.» (Yes)
- - course measurement technique for automotive applications doesnt cover powertrain (mostly vehicle dynamics) would be nice if engine and aftertreatment system are included. - i was missing engine testing/calibration/optimization in any of the ICE courses. - » (Yes)

11. Are there any courses that you think should either be heavily revised or even removed from the programme?

Yes»		17		62%
No»		10		37%

Genomsnitt: 1.37

- Powertrain mechanics Better interaction between ICE and ICE advanced Hybrid and control » (?)
- Measurement Techniques - Should def be removed since the examinaner appears to have no time for it, and the content is repetition of old stuff or just irrelevant. » (Yes)
- I think the introduction course should focus on the areas not covered in the other courses. Combustion courses are quite good. Safety was to much biology, the only thing interesting in that course was the psychology, traffic behaviour etc. The dynamics courses are quite good even though there are a lot of derivations. I think the hybrid course was bad. It didnt give any understanding of the systems that were modelled. The powertrain course feels like its been put together in a haste, cancelled lectures, improvised lectures and so on. Some of the stuff is also very basic so a higher level is required. The aerodynamics are a lot of pictures of beautiful old cars. Not much substance.» (Yes)
- Measurement techniques» (Yes)
- The Measurement techniques course» (Yes)
- Active safety» (Yes)
- I think the powertrain course has to be mandatory. I think this is something that all automotive engineers should study. The Hybrid course is important, but could be treated as a specialisation course.» (Yes)
- Both the safety courses (in 2009) - I thought they did not add much to my knowledge. Active safety should have more info about CAN, signal processing, etc. and perhaps some exercises in Simulink, since that is the industry standard. And perhaps more ls dyna exercises in passive safety - you could include some component crash simulations.» (Yes)
- Vehicle Dynamics - Its one of the best courses i have taken so far. But the number of assignments and the exam schedule were too much to take. It would be great if we had a lot of assignments and no exam in the course. I personally learnt a lot from the assignments.» (Yes)
- 2 courses of advanced passive safety and advanced active safety are so poor and nonsence and amature. » (Yes)
- vehicle safety courses(passive and active),since they are offering to vehicle students with mechanical engineering background,it had better emphasize on designing related components like airbag, seat belt, seat, rear and front structure, compartments with the aim of crashworthiness and stuff like these instead of showing statistics of crashes and injuries which mostly are irrelevant.» (Yes)
- Vehicle dynamics needs to be improved. Powertrain can be better.» (Yes)
- Remove safety» (Yes)
- I think the automotive projects are tricky. they need clearer goals and more guidance from teachers. if no clear goals are given, nobody will do his best to reach the goals and learn something but just show up with some simple results just to pass the project. there is a high risk that some people dont contribute to the project and get some easy credits. the planning should be carefully checked for feasability at beginning and checked if group is on schedule during project. » (Yes)
- vehicle dynamics is a interesting subject but the lectures are very bad » (Yes) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- 1. Introduction to Automotive engineering is a bit odd and way to basic. I don"t think any of the master programmes at IT has an introduction course teaching the students what a computer is or naval teaching their students what a ship look like. This course is way to basic. 2. The Measurement techiniques for automotive applications should be totally remade. » (Yes) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- yes, remove the safety course» (Yes) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

12. Impressions of the Powertrain specialisation.

Matrisfråga

- The hybrid course seems like it hasnt matured yet. Better planning in the powertrain course is needed.»
- Internal Combustion Engines Internal Combustion Engines Advanced Powertrain Mechanics»
- The advanced ICE course focused mostly on sprays and the research that is going on at Chalmers - you could include more practical aspects of engine performance, etc. Knowledge of sprays is only in the form of phenomena, so it is just theoretical knowledge.»
- practise? what practise?(except 2h engine lab sp1) Petter was the best teacher!»
- There are no practical exposure in this specialization. For that matter no practical exposure in any of the specialization tracks ! By practical i mean hands on experience.»
- teaching skills of teachers varies a lot, some are really good and some are really bad. teachers from the industry where often disappointing, which i was surprised about. undoubtebly their knowledge is great but often they cannot explain things clearly and are bad in presenting. often there is repetition of subjects. one guy from the industry tells this, the next one tells almost a similar thing. i would be nice if lecture content would be fitter better.»

relevance of the courses to this specialisation?
27 svarande

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		1		4%
OK»		2		8%
Good»		14		56%
Excellent»		8		32%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 4.16

balance between theory and practise in this specialisation?
27 svarande

Very poor»		2		7%
Poor»		3		11%
OK»		6		23%
Good»		12		46%
Excellent»		3		11%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.42

teachers in this specialisation?
27 svarande

Very poor»		2		7%
Poor»		0		0%
OK»		4		15%
Good»		16		61%
Excellent»		4		15%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.76

13. Impression of the Vehicle Dynamics specialisation.

Matrisfråga

- good courses, except for Measurement Techniques in Automotive Applications»
- Less theory in the dynamics courses and more in the aerodynamics could be nice.»
- I think it would be good if there are some additional problems using the Softwares like Adams or Dymola apart from just simulating in Matlab. This might give the student a pratical example of how the work is being carried in an Industry.»
- The courses should involve some of the industry used tools like Adams or Dymola rather than using only Matlab.»

relevance of the courses to this specialisation?
17 svarande

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		1		7%
OK»		2		15%
Good»		7		53%
Excellent»		3		23%
No opinion»		4

Genomsnitt: 3.92

balance between theory and practise in this specialisation?
17 svarande

Very poor»		1		7%
Poor»		1		7%
OK»		6		46%
Good»		3		23%
Excellent»		2		15%
No opinion»		4

Genomsnitt: 3.3

teachers in this specialisation?
17 svarande

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		2		15%
OK»		5		38%
Good»		5		38%
Excellent»		1		7%
No opinion»		4

Genomsnitt: 3.38

14. Impression of the Safety specialisation.

Matrisfråga

- It would be nice to have a course regarding building vehicle structures for better safety.»
- As noted above, active and passive safety courses could have improved content.»
- sorry, but this was the worst time of my life. This specalisation is for medical doctors.»
- vehicle safety courses(passive and active),since they are offering to vehicle students with mechanical engineering background,it had better emphasize on designing related components like airbag, seat belt, seat, rear and front structure, compartments with the aim of crashworthiness and stuff like these instead of showing statistics of crashes and injuries which mostly are irrelevant.»

relevance of the courses to this specialisation?
13 svarande

Very poor»		2		22%
Poor»		1		11%
OK»		2		22%
Good»		3		33%
Excellent»		1		11%
No opinion»		4

Genomsnitt: 3

balance between theory and practise in this specialisation?
13 svarande

Very poor»		3		33%
Poor»		1		11%
OK»		1		11%
Good»		2		22%
Excellent»		2		22%
No opinion»		4

Genomsnitt: 2.88

teachers in this specialisation?
13 svarande

Very poor»		2		22%
Poor»		0		0%
OK»		2		22%
Good»		3		33%
Excellent»		2		22%
No opinion»		4

Genomsnitt: 3.33

15. What is your impression of the automotive project courses: Automotive Engineering Project, Chalmers EcoMarathon and Chalmers Formula Student?

Matrisfråga

- CFS is probably the best experience i have from chalmers. Priceless when it comes to learning about reality.»
- Formula Student is the MOST important class i ever attended during my years at Chalmers. It has given me so much in terms of teori, practise and contacts.»
- I think everyone should be given an opportunity and not selecting by their experience. I would like to suggest a general examination to assess the capability of the applicant and there by conducting an interview who have succeeded in the examination. There are unequal proportion of students in these pojects as well, I see there are many International students in EcoMarathon and the opposite in Formula Student project. I request that there should be equal proportion of the Natives and the International Students in these projects. »
- The Eco Marathon should definitely be preserved as a course in the future but it would be good if someone could manage the course in the same way as Malin did with CFS. It"s a little bit to independent for now and needs some more managing with adequate goals.»
- Most of our time was wasted in trying to figure out how the system worked, from last year. We could have saved a lot of time if we had better support from last years" team members in showing us around the system in the first few weeks. This would have saved us a lot of time, and we could have used our time better. We also had no access to a proper place to test the engine/generators. The test setup in the electrical department was inconvenient, as the people were unwelcoming at best and hostile at worst. This was a very disappointing aspect of the project.»
- I have seen the examiner two times during the 10 project weeks!»
- I think the automotive projects are tricky. they need clearer goals and more guidance from teachers. if no clear goals are given, nobody will do his best to reach the goals and learn something but just show up with some simple results just to pass the project. there is a high risk that some people dont contribute to the project and get some easy credits. the planning should be carefully checked for feasability at beginning and checked if group is on schedule during project. »

Chalmers EcoMarathon
23 svarande

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%
OK»		0		0%
Good»		3		50%
Excellent»		3		50%
I have not participated in this project»		17

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Chalmers Formula Student
24 svarande

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%
OK»		1		14%
Good»		2		28%
Excellent»		4		57%
I have not participated in this project»		17

Genomsnitt: 4.42

Automotive Engineering Project
25 svarande

Very poor»		1		7%
Poor»		2		15%
OK»		4		30%
Good»		5		38%
Excellent»		1		7%
I have not participated in this project»		12

Genomsnitt: 3.23

Programme administration

16. Did you know that there is a Teacher"s Council including all examiners at Automotive Engineering programme that meet 3 times/year?

27 svarande

Yes»		5		18%
No»		22		81%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

17. What is your general impression of the programme administration?

27 svarande

Very poor»		3		12%
Poor»		2		8%
OK»		6		24%
Good»		11		44%
Excellent»		3		12%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- No mail from department coordinators regarding any thing» (Poor)
- nothing wrong with that, very good i think» (Good)

18. What is your opinion of the information as a current student within the program ?

Matrisfråga

- Programme info - Does it excist? Specialisations - Ok Elective courses - Hard to find which courses I could apply for. Projects - Emailed 1-3 days before selection. Theses - Have´,t recieved any info about thesis, have searched for my own.»
- I think this year the Measurement Techiques for Automotive Applications Course mostly dealt with vehicle dynamics and less Safety.»
- The course on Advanced Vehicle Aerodynamics must be offered to all the interested students. »
- Specialisations will not be included in the exam papers as last year students. Was not informed by Malin, recived the information when I emailed here.»
- I think that own ideas for thesis should be more estimulated. »
- Information about projects could be improved (on the home page) - to include some more specific details.»
- The information came out very late»
- The coordinator of the program is always busy and not possible to reach at all, »
- elective courses info was available quite late project info was available quite late. theses info abour requirements for thesis, dates, needed documants/approvals was actually never given»

Program information
28 svarande

Very poor»		3		10%
Poor»		6		21%
OK»		6		21%
Good»		9		32%
Excellent»		4		14%
No opinion»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.17

Specialisations
28 svarande

Very poor»		3		10%
Poor»		5		17%
OK»		8		28%
Good»		9		32%
Excellent»		3		10%
No opinion»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.14

Elective courses
28 svarande

Very poor»		2		7%
Poor»		5		18%
OK»		8		29%
Good»		9		33%
Excellent»		3		11%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.22

Projects
28 svarande

Very poor»		3		11%
Poor»		6		22%
OK»		7		25%
Good»		7		25%
Excellent»		4		14%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Theses
28 svarande

Very poor»		5		19%
Poor»		7		26%
OK»		6		23%
Good»		5		19%
Excellent»		3		11%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 2.76

19. What is your opinion on the support from the Student centre work?

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		2		11%
OK»		3		16%
Good»		8		44%
Very good»		5		27%
Did not seek their support or help»		10

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- I am not satisfy. the problem is with the timing.» (OK)

Study climate

20. Did you feel welcomed by Chalmers and the staff at the master programme during your first days?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		6		24%
Yes definitely»		19		76%
No opinion/did not attend»		2

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Other programme´,s had kick off etc not MPAUT, rather rad.» (To some extent)
- A campus tour would have been nice. A mandatory(attendance recorded) description of chalmers facilities would have been very useful.» (To some extent)
- The T-shirt is a good idea» (Yes definitely)
- It was very good and i really enjoy. It should be every year I will never forget this day.» (Yes definitely)
- wasnt there the first days» (No opinion/did not attend)

21. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		2		7%
OK»		6		21%
Rather well»		11		39%
Very well»		9		32%
Did not seek cooperation with my fellow students»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.96

- Normally different national student are not very close to each other the beast way to arrange groups by teachers and keep differnt national student in course projects and asignments. I have not a good intraction with students as every student like to keep relation with their country people as same language and culture but it would be more good to know every one. I am really missing this thing I wish to make friend from differnt countries.» (OK)
- The attempt to force Swedish - Foreign was total failure. Better to mix larger groups in intro course. Some foreign students should learn to use a clock an be in time fore classes. Same people every day who is late, anoying. » (Rather well)
- cooperation with iranian/pakistani/chinese students was hard and sometimes not pleasant. cooperation with indian students was really good. im european (not swedish) and hardly worked/spoke with swedish students from my class. in group work there were a lot of swedish only groups somehow, which i found too bad. the class seems to be devided in swedish and not swedish.» (Rather well)

22. What do you think of the principle of having mixed groups (culture, gender) in some of the courses?

Bad»		4		14%
Rather bad»		2		7%
OK»		3		11%
Good»		6		22%
Very good»		12		44%
No opinion»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.74

- All courses it has been applied to, it resulted in bad team work. Better to let student chose partner them self. » (Bad)
- Doesnt suit me.» (Bad)
- All nationalities have different background and some of them hasen´,t even seen MATLAB. So if you have the missfortune to work with certain students, you are doomed to do all the work yourself. Many student´,s does not attend the automotive program and therefore makes it really hard to find suitible times for group-work, again the swedish automotive student is the one who has to do all the work! Some students speak end write english so bad that they refuse to do any writing on reports or to have a presentation with the group. Some nationalities works harder than others. The whole idea with forced-mixing of nationalities is a retarded idea. Basic knowledge in basic softwares should be the minimun requirement to attend the program, but this requirement seems to have been overlook so that the program administrator can allocate a certain quota of foreign students.» (Bad)
- Is person-to-person dependant, very big differences» (OK)
- the more diversity, the less boring life is in Sweden» (Very good)
- I think this should be done in every course, probably from another nation but not necessarily be a Swede :)» (Very good)
- I think this is a good idea, since it is impossible for an international student to socialize with Swedish students if you don"t have an excuse. Swedes tend to be very closed and tend to exclude outsiders by default.» (Very good)
- im european (not swedish) and hardly worked/spoke with swedish students from my class. in group work there were a lot of swedish only groups somehow, which i found too bad.» (Very good)

23. How are the opportunities to come in contact with teachers?

27 svarande

Very poor»		0		0%
Poor»		2		7%
OK»		4		14%
Good»		13		48%
Excellent»		8		29%
Did not seek contact»		0

Genomsnitt: 4

- they are not always available, could be better if they had some time scheduled for clarification» (OK)
- good, teachers are really open if you have questions. the door is always open (liturally) to walk in and ask questions. even teachers from the industry provide all contact information in case we have questions to them» (Good)

24. Are your impression that the student opinions and results from course evaluations have significant impact and are taken seriously?

Not at all»		5		21%
Tome some extent»		11		47%
Yes, definetly»		7		30%
No opinion»		4

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- vehicle dynamics course» (Not at all)
- The input from earlier evalutations of the measurement course can"t have been taken seriously.» (Not at all)
- Yes, all courses seem´,s to get more difficult for every year.» (Not at all)
- It would be very good if teacher excluded from evaluation of course and all student should fill the evaluation form online. The evaluation should be three times during course and at the end of every evaluation the teacher should inform about improvement.» (Tome some extent)

25. What do you think of attending an education given in English instead of in your native language?

Bad»		0		0%
Rather bad»		0		0%
OK»		2		8%
Good»		5		20%
Very good»		18		72%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 4.64

- The purpose is ok, but pointless when some of the teachers are bad at it?! The quality of the teachers english is bad in almost all cases!» (OK)
- the question is a bit vague... what do you exactly want to know?» (Good)
- Since English is fast becoming the default language in which everybody does business, I think this is a step in the right direction.» (Very good)
- Atleast 50% of a class are International Students and it is impossible to give education in their respective language. If the medium of instructions is Swedish it can be possible but hardly few International students speak Swedish» (No opinion)

26. To what extent is your knowledge/competence from your bachelor degree sufficient to attend this programme?

28 svarande

Poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
OK»		2		7%
Good»		10		35%
Very good»		16		57%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- My knowledge from the ("lower degree") bachelor program supercedes the knowledge from the ("higher degree") automotive program.» (OK)
- With a Bachelors in Mechanical engineering, I had no problems in following any of the subjects.» (Good)

27. What is your opinion about that you are expected to have computer skills in Matlab?

27 svarande

Very poor»		3		11%
Poor»		3		11%
OK»		4		14%
Good»		11		40%
Excellent»		6		22%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

- too much matlab! » (Very poor)
- I did not have experience in programming but through the Introductory course and department courses I have gained a lot of experience» (Poor)
- I think it is important to learn how to use Matlab, but also, there are more tools that could be employed. For instance, Excel.» (Poor)
- an advanced course for matlab should be added to the programme since i know many students do not know this programming language especially international students including me ,still sufferung the shortage of knowledge in matlab. » (Poor)
- Its good because if you don"t know matlab, then you learn. But any way, you can do almost all in exel or any other spreadsheet, exepting only a couple of courses.» (OK)
- I wish someone had told me that I needed matlab before the course so I could have done some studying.» (Good)
- Although it was difficult for me initially, I picked it up over time, and I am now quite comfortable with it.» (Good)
- Since i have sufficient knowledge in "C" , Matlab was easy to understand. But it would be great if you can put up some information on the course page so that the new students are aware about it.» (Good)
- i didnt have any matlab skills, some programming skills though, but learned it by doing and i learned it quite quick i think. you should keep it like it is now. » (Excellent)

Summarizing questions

28. What is your general impression of the programme so far?

Very Poor»		1		3%
Poor»		0		0%
OK»		7		25%
Good»		15		55%
Very good»		4		14%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Studying here has caused me to loose most of my interest in cars.» (Very Poor)
- Some of the courses doesnt feel like they live up to the standard at chalmers.» (OK)
- God except for some courses. Ensure course PM exists for all course, then it will be better.» (Good)
- Specialisation courses should be futhur improved with more practical oriented problems(laboratory exercises) or introduction to Software related problems.» (Good)

29. Considering your experience from this programme, would you choose this programme if you could turn back time?

No»		4		17%
Yes»		19		82%
I do not know»		4

Genomsnitt: 1.82

- I would have choosen a program that gave me more knowledge about mechanics and then read some automotive-papers.» (No)
- without any doubts, i would choose 1 or 2 other courses though» (Yes)
- Depends on the cost. If 140000 is the yearly tuition I might have gone to the US or UK» (I do not know)
- I was choosing between automotive and solid and fluid. Hard to tell before i tried to get a job.» (I do not know)

30. Would an internship system have had any impact on your choice of masters programme?

28 svarande

No, not at all»		2		7%
To some extent»		4		15%
Yes definitely»		20		76%
No opinion»		2

Genomsnitt: 2.69

- It would be positive, but I would chose it anyway since it is in my interesst.» (No, not at all)
- I "feel" that it would be difficult for me to find a job in Sweden. Many international students go back home because they can"t find a job here.» (Yes definitely)
- would be great if chalmers helped us find some internships» (Yes definitely)
- More contacts with the industry could be appreciated.» (Yes definitely)
- Yes internships would definitely give the student a industrial experience. I feel Chalmers should introduce some kind of research and teaching assistanceships to the masters students. This would increase one"s chances of getting a Phd.» (Yes definitely)
- I think this is a great idea. Industry exposure is always a plus, atleast for those who would be interested in looking for a job after the masters.» (Yes definitely)
- Yes, and i can´,t see why this hasn´,t been done yet. This would make this program a whole lot better and provide us with experience. » (Yes definitely)
- i dont really get the question» (No opinion)

31. What should definitely be preserved?

32. What should definitely be changed?

33. Additional comments

* obligatoriska frågor