Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Power electronic solutions for power systems, ENM100
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-12-06 - 2011-01-18 Antal svar: 16 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.16 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 6% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 18% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 18% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 7 | | 43% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 3.37 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 16 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 6% |
50%» | | 1 | | 6% |
75%» | | 3 | | 18% |
100%» | | 11 | | 68% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - Due to very busy schedule I could not attend a lot of lectures.» (25%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?16 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 6% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 12% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 13 | | 81% |
Genomsnitt: 3.68 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Perhaps update the course-pm to make a bit of a list of things and to the extent some of them should be known.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 15 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?15 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 6% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 26% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - Unfortunatly I was hospitalized.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.68
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 37% |
Great extent» | | 10 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - I could not attend all the lectures but the ones I attended were very helpful in getting a better understanding of the topic.» (Large extent)
- Great lectures with a one of the best teachers I"ve had at my 5 years at Chalmers.» (Great extent)
7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?16 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 18% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 56% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.06 - The lectures were very informative and contributed to a large extent. However, the tutorial and the tutorial materials need to be revised - contributed to confusion!» (Some extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?16 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 11 | | 68% |
Genomsnitt: 3.62
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?16 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 6% |
Very good» | | 15 | | 93% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.93 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?16 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 12 | | 75% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 11. How was the course workload?16 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 6% |
Adequate» | | 9 | | 56% |
High» | | 5 | | 31% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - As it should, on a masters course with that many courses preceding it. » (Adequate)
12. How was the total workload this study period?16 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 31% |
High» | | 7 | | 43% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.93 - This is true for me as I was taking three courses and had my thesis at the same time. May be not true in general.» (High)
- I had two more courses and Power Market Management course had a high work load.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?16 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 7 | | 43% |
Excellent» | | 9 | | 56% |
Genomsnitt: 4.56 - A course that sort of summarized the master and at the same time tought you a bunch of new and intressting stuff.» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- PSCAD tutorials»
- The teachers and the PSCAD computer assignments.»
- Everything»
- every thing»
- more tutorials exercises»
- The PSCAD exercises were execellent and very helpful and should definitely be continued for the coming year.»
- the teacher»
- The teacher!»
- The PSCAD part, and the demonstration gridfault in Brasil?»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the PSCAD models can be simulate by students themselve»
- More tutorials!
The teacher should do more examples in class.
The teacher teaches too fast.»
- nothing»
- Not change but if it is possible teacher can give more example of industrial project or his experience»
- I belive that the course PM is a bit fuzzy but if you attend the lectures ant tutorials you get a good grip on what to know. But that is not always the case for everyone. »
16. Additional comments- Both lectures and tutorials were really good!»
- In my opinion, this course was the best course of Electric Power Engineering Master program. Because the lectures were organized in a way which it was neither too hard and nor easy. Massimo was very clear, and helpful, and was able to teach the complicated subjects in a simple way.
Tarik was also very helpful, especially at the computer assignments.
The only thing which should be approved is that we didn"t have the solutions of the old exams at the portal, and my exam result would be much better if we had access to the old exam solutions.
Totally, I am vey much satisfied and thankfull to the teachers of the course.»
- Great Teacher, Great course, even though it"s a little bit difficult to understand»
- none»
- Thanks to teacher and tutor »
- A big thanks to you both for a great course. »
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.68 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.89
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|