|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Power electronic converters, ENM060Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-12-06 - 2011-01-03 Antal svar: 29 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.58 - very very heavy course» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.44 - 90%» (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - They are good but not yet perfect.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.04 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - It was a messy exam!!» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.82 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - Not really read it.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.17 - Not that badly, but it would have helped greatly if all powerpoints and assignments were up on the web at least i week ahead. it"s quite tedious to go to a computer room and find a printer in working order before almost single lecture, could you print most of it in one go you would save a lot of time for a lot of students...» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.68 11. How was the course workload?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.78 - There is room for more activities, e.g. hand in assignments. » (Low) 12. How was the total workload this study period?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.89 - Some hand in assignments would be reasonable in both courses.» (Too low) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - Very difficult.» (Adequate) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The tutorials and PSPICE exercises.»- PSpice assignments» - Pspice tutorials» - The midterm exam, and the laborations. » - Pspice is nice, The labs are good as well. Keep giving out handouts.» - The labs.» - P-spice assignments were great and the assistants did a very good job» - Labs» - The demonstration notes on the homepage were very good and should be preserved.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The mid-term exam was to large. A mid-term exam that is 4 h (nearly the same as the final exam) and can give you maximum 5 p. If that is compared to the final exam that means that you have to get 5 as grade and I think that the mid-term exam has to be smaller, maybe 45 minutes max. 1 h.»- Not so many lectures, take away the laborations» - The scoring points at the trial exam. (It got to be some result that gives zero points between 2p an -2p)» - There should not be any errors on, or risk of misunderstanding, the exam thesis. During this exam there was several different errors and one which made it impossible to solve the first question. When the teacher told us the additional info needed to solve the question I had already given up solving that one. » - The exam was a mess, missing some important numbers. Question 2 was to big and to confusing, it included everything in the course almost. There is no need to make it that extensive. Its enough with on question on each part of the course, not putting everything together into one big. Question 1 with the LC filter at the DC source have we never talked about, at least what I can remember. If Pspice is about Buck converter there is no need for a lab as well on the Buck converter.» - course covers too many important topics and my suggestion is two examinations one as mid-term and one as usual. » - The bonus system for the dugga. (Not -2 p)» - The exam was the single most time consuming I can remeber during my time at chalmers. Reduce the number of exam tasks by a few and I belive the results will improve» - Nothing» - The p-spice assignment should be avalible earlier. The exam was to diffrent from the tutorials.» - Minus points on the trial exam, this is management by fear!! Not good!» - The lecture notes on the homepage could be better. The pictures are good, but they should be complemented with more text or mathematical derivations. The questions on the exam are divided in many parts. The total number of questions to be answered is too high for an exam of only 4 hours.» 16. Additional comments- Did not like the point distribution of the exam, why have 10, 34 and 6 points? Why not have equal amount on every question. Whit this system you will fail the exam if you have a slight problem with the large question.»- i think its better to specify some days for the students preparing for the final examination, its not fair jus after finishing the lecture we would have the final, we would attend the classes almost from 8 in the morning until 5 in the afternoon, so there would be no time to prepare ourselves at home!» - Overall it was a good course, one of the more "practical" and that"s good. The only bad thing is the poor exam. It dosen"t feel good when you don´,t have time to go through all the questions.» - There need to be some more tutors during the PSpice exercises because this year you had to wait a very long time before you could get any help or before you could report.» Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.78
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10%