|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Turbomachinery, TME210Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-11-15 - 2010-11-30 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45% Kontaktperson: Tomas Grönstedt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.05 - Not accounting for lectures, that is» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. To which extent did you take part of the teaching offered?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.44 - due to a clash with another course» (60-80%) 3. Balance during study quarter?During the study quarter how does the time spent on this course relate to the other courses:18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.44 Goals and goal fulfilment4. How understandable are the course goals?The course PM states that after completion of the course you should be able to:* Explain how turbomachinery is applied in various fields of power generation such as nuclear and combined cycle power plants, wind and hydropower engineering and process industry. * Formulate turbomachinery design criteria for a range of applications. * Carry out preliminary design of a range of turbomachines * Be able to apply commercial tools to outline more detailed turbomachinery design 18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 5. To which extent did you establish the abilities that the goals state?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.22 Teaching and course administration6. How well did the course administration, course PM, web page, handouts etc work?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 7. How do you rate the learning impact of the computer lab (2D turbine CFD)?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - You cannot be very proud of how the lab turned out...? You learned a lot anyhow.» (Poor) 8. How do you rate the industrial lecture by Michael Källberg/SCANPUMP?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.58 - did not attend» (?) 9. How do you rate the industrial lecture by Rolf Karlsson (steam turbine lecture)?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.94 - Was unable to attend.» (?) 10. How do you rate the water turbine lab?Comments on preparatory material, contents etc18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.44 - unfortunately 1 hour was short especially when the preliminary calculations are wrong...
but really interesting and it is nice to wrk on smthg which is concrete» (Good) 11. How do you rate the study visit to the Olidan power plant?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.55 - More technical information had been interesting, long travel (in time) » (Acceptable) 12. How do you rate the lectures/lecture material?You may provide specific comments to either Tomas Grönstedt and/or Håkan Nilsson18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.77 - The slides where very godd for leraning the theory problems.» (Good) 13. How do you rate the exercises with respect to quality content etc?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.94 - The exercises was quite good, but they were alot harder than the exam questions.» (Acceptable) 14. How do you rate the course book?Did all chapters have the same quality. Do you think that some sections should be excluded for next year or should something else be included?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - Too much to read.» (Acceptable) General questions15. What should be preserved for next year?- computer lab, study visit and industrial lectures are very helpful.»- Guest lecture, and study visit» - Labs and exercises, though the CDF project should be made less time-consuming» - The study visit» - Water turbine lab, some kind of cfd-lab, guest lectures, hand in task» - visit, water turbine lab, warm-up exercise» - Labs» - The study visit to Olidan» - theorey problems» 16. What should be changed for next year?- Credits should be assigned to computer lab from start. Lab is very interesting.»- The exam should reflect the exercises in the book.» - Easier exam, more prepared computer lab. Introduce the course with more examples visit to the wind tunnel lab and other practical stuff to make it easier to understand what we calculate later on» - make the computer lab easier, have an introductory lecture for basic knowledge (start with the velocity triangle without showing videos is hard for non-applied mechanics students) give assignments (2 or 3 small exercises for the most important chapter perhaps because the warm-up exercise is a good idea but is nt enough, give easy assignments to make sure students understand what is important!» - The computer lab should be better prepared» - relation between exercises and exam» 17. What is your overall rating of the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.72 - Liked it a lot. Both Tomas and Egill did a very good job teaching!» (Good)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38%