ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Global Chemical Sustainability 2010, KBT140

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-11-11 - 2010-11-26
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Magdalena Svanström»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 38%
Around 20 hours/week»3 23%
Around 25 hours/week»2 15%
Around 30 hours/week»2 15%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»3 23%
50%»1 7%
75%»5 38%
100%»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- I missed the last lecture due to sickness» (75%)
- Almost, I attended as much as I could.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

According to the course syllabus: After successfully completing the course, the students should be able to:
•, Describe the function and state of the natural systems in the world
•, Explain how the human society, in particular chemical and chemical engineering industry, affects and depends on natural systems
•, Describe international and regional work on environment and sustainable development on governmental and non-governmental level
•, Identify appropriate tools and strategies for sustainable development in society, in particular industry
•, Analyze sectors of society, in particular chemical and chemical engineering industry, and formulate appropriate strategies for sustainable development
•, Describe the importance of including different stakeholders and perspectives in discussions on sustainable technology development

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 92%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 75%
No, the goals are set too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

- I guess I was slightly over qualified for this course since it is my second year in my master programme.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»5 38%
Yes, definitely»6 46%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- some of the bonus excercises did not feel like they were useful for my learning. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 30%
Large extent»7 53%
Great extent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- Some of the lecturers were better than others.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»4 30%
Some extent»3 23%
Large extent»4 30%
Great extent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- I think the book is not essential for the book, I managed to learn most from the lectures.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 38%
Very well»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Teaching and learning activities

9. How useful were the lectures by Magdalena Svanström in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Magdalena Svanström»

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»3 23%
Quite useful»3 23%
Very useful»7 53%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. How useful was the lecture by Morgan Fröling in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Morgan Fröling»

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»1 14%
Quite useful»3 42%
Very useful»3 42%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 3.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. How useful was the lecture by Hans Theliander in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Hans Theliander»

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»5 71%
Very useful»2 28%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 3.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Can"t remember» (No opinion)

12. How useful was the lecture by Thomas Hjertberg in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Thomas Hjertberg»

12 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»4 57%
Very useful»3 42%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 3.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. How useful was the lecture by the journalist, Karl-Johan Bondesson, in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»3 37%
Very useful»5 62%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 3.62 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. How useful was the lecture by Christer Ågren from the Secretariat of Acid Rain in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»5 62%
Very useful»3 37%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 3.37 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. How useful was the lecture by Jerker Ligthart from the Chemicals Secretariat in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»2 16%
Could have been better»1 8%
Quite useful»4 33%
Very useful»5 41%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. How useful were the lectures by Gregory Peters in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»5 45%
Very useful»6 54%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The bit about chemical properties was boring, otherwise very interesting.» (Quite useful)

17. How useful was the lecture by Gustav Sandin in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

13 svarande

Not useful at all»1 14%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»5 71%
Very useful»1 14%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 2.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. How useful were the lectures by Gunilla Clancy in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

13 svarande

Not useful at all»2 16%
Could have been better»6 50%
Quite useful»3 25%
Very useful»1 8%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- My only suggestion is to speak a little louder, it was very hard to follow her lecture because of this» (Could have been better)

19. How useful was the lecture by Rickard Arvidsson in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»3 50%
Very useful»3 50%
No opinion»7

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Can"t remember» (No opinion)

20. How useful was the exercise on "Urgent issues" in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»5 83%
Very useful»1 16%
No opinion»7

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

21. How useful was the exercise on "Basic concepts" in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»1 12%
Could have been better»1 12%
Quite useful»4 50%
Very useful»2 25%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 2.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Could have been a little more difficult.» (Could have been better)

22. How useful was the exercise on "Multicriteria analysis" in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»1 14%
Quite useful»3 42%
Very useful»3 42%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 3.28 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

23. How useful was the Preknowledge test in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»1 8%
Could have been better»1 8%
Quite useful»7 58%
Very useful»3 25%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It made me start reading from the start of the course» (Quite useful)

24. How useful was the Al Gore Movie in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»1 9%
Could have been better»2 18%
Quite useful»7 63%
Very useful»1 9%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- There really is better documentaries about the environment. The Cove, Manufactured Landscapes, the wes men fix the world.» (Could have been better)
- Interesting to discuss» (Quite useful)
- I have already watched it» (No opinion)

25. How useful was the work in the big Project in your learning?

12 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»2 18%
Quite useful»3 27%
Very useful»6 54%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was hard since some students didn"t do their job well.» (Quite useful)

26. How useful was the Museum Visit in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»2 20%
Could have been better»3 30%
Quite useful»4 40%
Very useful»1 10%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Again, interesting to do something a little different and discuss.» (Quite useful)

27. How useful was the Sustainability Seminar in your learning?

12 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»4 50%
Very useful»4 50%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was hard to judge some essays since they were copied from other sources.» (Quite useful)

28. How useful was the Role Debate in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»1 14%
Quite useful»2 28%
Very useful»4 57%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 3.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

29. How useful was the individual Bonus activity in your learning?

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»2 50%
Very useful»2 50%
No opinion»9

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.13

Study climate

30. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»11 84%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

31. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»4 30%
Very well»8 61%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- The project was very difficult to get started.» (Rather poorly)
- The cooperation woorked well with moste students, but with others not that well unfortunatley.» (Rather well)

32. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»7 53%
High»4 30%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- High, but I liked it and it was structured.» (High)
- Too many extra activities, and sometimes not proportional to number points given. If you get 3 point for the museum and only 6 for the sustainability seminar (which took much longer to do).» (High)

33. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»1 7%
High»8 61%
Too high»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Mostly due to the other course I took, that one was not at all structured which made it difficult to plan. Also it collided with Global Chemical Sustainability at times, which made me miss e.g. Multi Criteria Analysis.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

34. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 23%
Adequate»2 15%
Good»5 38%
Excellent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Well performed» (Excellent)

35. Do you think that the examination form with the bonus system in this course is good?

13 svarande

No, this should be changed»1 7%
It can be improved»2 15%
The system is OK»7 53%
The system is excellent»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- can be good if the bonus activities give something to the learning...» (It can be improved)
- Too many bonus activities.» (The system is OK)

36. Did the course improve your ability to change perspectives?

In the course introduction, it was explained that the diversity among the students was to be used in different exercises in order to improve your ability to understand different perspectives related to time, geographical conditions, cultures and disciplines.

13 svarande

No, it did not!»0 0%
To a minor extent it did»4 30%
Yes, in some ways»6 46%
Yes, it absolutely did!»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

37. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- sustainability seminar and K-J Bondesson»
- The guest lectures and the bonus points»
- the method of learning given was good. By giving varies activities make students more understand with the objective of the course. »
- The project, but maybe more individualized if possible.»
- The big project»

38. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the schedule almost always colliding with other mandatory courses on the same master program»
- Maybe the book, it seems is more oriented to younger students»
- The material of lectures were so general, it"s good to give much information, but sometimes it was not focused on the topic.»
- Less bonus activities.»
- The subject is too much»

39. Additional comments

- Good course»
- This was the best sustainability course I have taken so far.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.92
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.1
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.7

Kursutvärderingssystem från