Visa resultat

Combustion Engineering, Men031

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

At most 10 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 15 hours/week»		1		11%
Around 20 hours/week»		4		44%
Around 25 hours/week»		1		11%
At least 30 hours/week»		3		33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Nore towards the end then maybe aroun 25.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- The course needed a lot of work» (At least 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		1		11%
100%»		8		88%

Genomsnitt: 4.88

- I missed maybe two lectures.» (100%)

3. Do you consider that you had sufficient knowledge to read this course

Yes, absolutely»		4		44%
In part but I struggled in places»		5		55%
No»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

- The course book helped me catch up on the chemical kinetics and such.» (Yes, absolutely)
- As mechanical engineer I lacked some pre-knowledge compared to chemical friends. However, everthing that was needed to know was written in the course book, so I had info, just needed to understand it.» (In part but I struggled in places)
- Basic chemistry and full understanding of some stuff» (In part but I struggled in places)

Goals and goal fulfilment

4. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		1		12%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		1		12%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		6		75%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		7		100%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I don"t remember them» (?)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have achieved the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		4		57%
Yes, definitely»		3		42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Partly it was very hard.» (To some extent)
- Even though the first task was somewhat more complicated than expected.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching methods

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

small extent»		0		0%
some extent»		0		0%
large extent»		7		77%
great extent»		2		22%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- good with a lot of assistance on the assignments» (large extent)
- Good teachers, all of them. Expecially Thunman, Lind and Seeman showed great interest in teaching.» (great extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature been of help for your learning?

small extent»		0		0%
some extent»		0		0%
large extent»		4		44%
great extent»		5		55%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- It was a well written book but it would be good with a register so you can find what you looking for more easy.» (large extent)
- Very good book!» (great extent)
- Very good book, for beeing free. » (great extent)

9. Did you find powerpoint presentations to be helpful?

small extent»		0		0%
some extent»		5		55%
large extent»		4		44%
great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- sometimes there were some mistakes in the ppt presentations» (some extent)
- Sometimes it could be better to use the board tio explain things and derivations» (some extent)
- Always good to have to complement the book» (large extent)

10. What was your overall impression of the lectures?

Excellent»		0		0%
Good»		8		88%
Moderate»		1		11%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- Especially the visitors were interesting.» (Good)

11. What was your overall impression of assignments 1-5?

Excellent»		1		11%
Good»		8		88%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

- Working with assignments helps the understanding a lot. Keep them all.» (Excellent)
- The guidlines could improve a bit but the tasks are generally good.» (Good)

12. What was your overall impression of assignment 6?

Very interesting»		5		55%
Fairly interesting»		4		44%
Not interesting»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.44

- There is need of more clear information about the work load needed for the extra tasks.» (Very interesting)
- Especially the presentation and discussion part. Well organized and planned. Good to have two groups with deeper knowledge about one task so that there could be an interesting discussion. Also the lady from Metso did a really good job.» (Very interesting)
- It was a little too hard to get instructions how to proceed if one got stuck.» (Very interesting)
- Excellent. But fairly tiring extra task (3). You learned a lot.» (Very interesting)
- To much» (Fairly interesting)

13. How well did the course administration and homepage work?

Excellent»		2		22%
Good»		6		66%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The news of the course could have been posted» (Good)
- Some more comments on the webpage would hav ebeen helpful» (Good)

Teaching staff and guest lectures

14. Please rate lectures by Henrik Thunman

Excellent»		1		11%
Very good»		5		55%
Good»		1		11%
Moderate»		1		11%
Poor»		1		11%
Not present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

15. Please rate the lectures by Martin Seemann

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		6		66%
Good»		3		33%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%
Not present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

16. Please rate the lecture by Åsa Burman

Excellent»		2		22%
Very Good»		1		11%
Good»		3		33%
Moderate»		3		33%
Poor»		0		0%
Not present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- The GoBiGas was very interesting!» (Excellent)
- She seemed to be very confident and knowledgeable about the project.» (Excellent)

17. Please rate the Margareta Lundberg as a moderator

Excellent»		3		33%
Very Good»		3		33%
Good»		2		22%
Moderate»		1		11%
Poor»		0		0%
Not present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- She provided good insights to real industrial applications.» (Excellent)

18. Please rate combustion demonstration by Sture Wingård

Excellent»		3		33%
Very Good»		3		33%
Good»		2		22%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		1		11%
Not present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- The best way to start a coures like this.» (Excellent)
- Best demonstrations of combustion I have ever seen.» (Excellent)
- Good way to introduce the course and made it easier to picture different flame caracteristics during the course later on.» (Very Good)
- I like his "crazy professor"-attitude» (Very Good)

19. Please rate the lecture by Anders Lyngfelt

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		0		0%
Good»		5		55%
Moderate»		3		33%
Poor»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Had already heard that lecture in two other courses.» (Good)
- We had heard this lecture twice before by him» (Moderate)
- I was already really familiar with the subject and he was not able to tell anything new.» (Moderate)
- Heard it all before. Seen the slides etc. Should"ve skipped it if I knew.» (Poor)

20. Please rate the lecture by Bo Leckner

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		3		33%
Good»		4		44%
Moderate»		2		22%
Poor»		0		0%
Not Present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- Good general information» (Very Good)
- To much to say in too short time» (Good)
- He focused on parts that I had already heard in "heat and power" course and Energiteknik. In the same time he had more interesting things to talk about but since he spent so much time on the first part he did not have time to go through it all. Even though he got some time to talk about FB boilers on an ass. 6 ocasion, I believe he had more interesting things to say. So to next time he can take it on a "higher level".» (Good)
- It is a bit hard to understand what to focus one. The material can be imporved to matche the exam questions.» (Moderate)

21. Please rate the lecture by Anders Lars-Erik Eriksson

Excellent»		1		11%
Very Good»		0		0%
Good»		5		55%
Moderate»		2		22%
Poor»		0		0%
Not Present»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Really interesting and scientific information.» (Excellent)

22. Please rate the lecture by Sven Andersson

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		4		50%
Good»		1		12%
Moderate»		1		12%
Poor»		0		0%
Not Present»		2		25%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Nice conclusion of the internal combustion engine.» (Very Good)

23. Please rate the lecture by Klas Andersson

Excellent»		1		11%
Very Good»		1		11%
Good»		2		22%
Moderate»		1		11%
Poor»		0		0%
Not Present»		4		44%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

24. Please rate the exercises by Fredrik Lind

Excellent»		3		33%
Very Good»		5		55%
Good»		1		11%
Moderate»		0		0%
Poor»		0		0%
Not Present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

- Fredrik is very good in explaining things and exercises, make a studen tunderstand. He always had time to help if one went up to the department» (Excellent)
- The most enthusiastic tutor. Very good.» (Excellent)
- Very helpful and good at explaining things. » (Very Good)
- Got enough help when needed.» (Very Good)

25. Please rate the exercises by Sadegh Seddighi Khavidak

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		2		22%
Good»		5		55%
Moderate»		1		11%
Poor»		1		11%
Not Present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Different teaching technic, I like that he put out question in the class and demand an answer but he has to be "nicer" to thoose who tries to answer... Specially since he seems to is a very nice guy.» (Good)
- Some problems with understanding the handwriting but he was otherwise very helpful.» (Good)
- He is sometimes not that clear but imporved during the course.» (Moderate)

26. Please rate the exercises by Abton Larsson

Excellent»		0		0%
Very Good»		2		22%
Good»		6		66%
Moderate»		1		11%
Poor»		0		0%
Not Present»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- Very helpful! Thank you!» (Very Good)
- Was very committed to helping with projects, good!» (Very Good)
- Especially in the sixth assignment we would have needed answers to many questions earlier. We were even able to ask the right questions concerning our problems but did not get them which frustrated us and made us do lots of extremely unnecessary repetition.» (Moderate)

Study climate

27. What did you think about the work load for the assignments?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		4		44%
High»		4		44%
Too high»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- It was a bit high for assignement 6. I didn"t expect the extra task to be so time consuming» (Adequate)
- Varied a lot, the first five was well balanced. The last one took some time though...» (High)
- Varied from adequate to very high.» (High)

28. What did you think about the overall work load in the course?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		33%
High»		6		66%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- But its si expected on this level.» (High)
- The questions in the exam were known to be very hard, so we worked really hard.» (High)
- .. but fun!» (High)

29. How was the work load this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		33%
High»		4		44%
Too High»		2		22%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- This course took a lot more time than the other one.» (High)

30. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		2		22%
Very good»		7		77%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- It was quite easy to find the people in their rooms when needed. Sometimes the answers were just a little too vague to help our group.» (Rather good)

31. How well has the cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		1		11%
Very good»		8		88%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- Without other people in the same situation I would not have found the motivation to work enough for this hard course.» (Very good)

Summarizing questions

32. What is your overall impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Good»		6		66%
Excellent»		3		33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Lot of work, but I feel I learned something, so I do not complain much.» (Good)
- I learned a lot that I believe will be helpful in my future work!» (Excellent)

33. What improvements can be made to next year?

34. What should definitely be preserved next year?