ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT190 - Nuclear Chemistry 2010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-11-01 - 2010-11-15
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga

1. Lectures: Difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the lectures in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

13 svarande

1» 1 7%

2» 0 0%

3» 4 30%

4» 5 38%

5» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.69 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too shallow lectures. Use the time better and get in to more depth during the lectures.» (1)
- It"s hard to remember much of the lectures or anything since the chapters were gone through at a rapid pace.» (3)
- Jag hade inte läst några kemi kurser sedan gymnasiet men samtidigt så var det mycket som man behövde kunna utantill tyckte jag.» (5)
- by difficulty i meant "difficulty to get grade 5"» (5)

2. Lectures: Interesting

Please grade how interesting the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 0 0%

4» 9 69%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

3. Lectures: Relevance

Please grade how relevant the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 3 23%

3» 1 7%

4» 5 38%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Since the lectures do not go into any depth they are not too relevant to me.» (2)
- They did not feel relevant for passing the exam» (2)
- ch 10 was for me irrelevant» (4)

4. Lectures: Handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

12 svarande

1» 1 8%

2» 0 0%

3» 6 50%

4» 3 25%

5» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.41 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I did not read the handouts» (?)
- Värdelösa! Jag hade ingen nytta av varken de eller föreläsningarna.» (1)
- They were good, but not really helpful for the final examination.» (3)
- keep long texts on lec. notes. those who think it"s to much might as well skip reading them.» (5)

5. Lectures: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 5 38%

4» 4 30%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much time. Use much more of the lecture time to actually lecture, OR book much shorter lessons. Annoying to alway quit one hour early. » (5)

6. Lectures: Number of lectures

Would you have liked more lectures to cover the course?

13 svarande

Yes» 6 46%

No» 7 53%

Genomsnitt: 1.53

- At least, more time, because I am not sure that more lecture each week would have made it easier.» (Yes)
- I think the material should be redistributed between the two course. Nuclear chemistry and applied nuclear chemistry» (Yes)
- inte om föreläsaren är samma. Det var inget fel på antalet lektioner men jag tyckte föreläsaren hade kunnat lägga fram kursen på ett bättre sätt. så.» (No)
- Use the time better instead.» (No)
- But I would liked more calculation exercises» (No)

7. Lecturer: Prof. Christian Ekberg

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".
(Most lectures of the course)

13 svarande

1» 1 7%

2» 2 15%

3» 1 7%

4» 5 38%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.69 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- An interesting and funny person, but it did not feel like he had the ambition to learn the course content to us students» (2)
- Very good and amusing as a lecturer.» (4)
- Speaking English with heavy accent» (4)
- He made the lectures exciting. but when one check the book and the enourmous amount of information. I wonder how the lectures are related to the curriculum because they cover only a little part of what is on the text. Although he stressed that he want us to read the text, I think reading something new and trying to understand it alone without any guidance is in-effective on our level.» (5)

8. Lecturer: Dr. Stefan Allard

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".
(Chemistry introduction)

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 2 15%

4» 6 46%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good review» (4)
- Exciting lectures and great explanation. » (5)

9. Laboratory exercises: understanding

Please indicate how the abs have increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 0 0%

4» 7 53%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Could have been even more understanding if the supervisors would have been more qualified and able to answer questions. The exceptions were Stefan and Stellan who both did a very good job. Many supervisors very afraid of thinking outside the instructions ("let"s not think too much, just follow the instructions")» (4)
- Generally good laborations» (5)

10. Laboratory exercises: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the labs have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 1 7%

4» 5 38%

5» 7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. Laboratory exercises: Measuring ionizing radiation - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 2 15%

4» 4 30%

5» 7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Better supervision would have made it even more relevant.» (4)
- we learned a lot about the detectors.» (5)

12. Laboratory exercises: Measuring ionizing radiation - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

13 svarande

1» 2 15%

2» 2 15%

3» 5 38%

4» 3 23%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too easy» (1)
- this rating is for both lab and its report (same for the other labs)» (4)

13. Laboratory exercises: Measuring ionizing radiation - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc. Anna Gustafsson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 3 23%

4» 6 46%

5» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.84 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Little ability to answer questions concerning the lab. Afraid of thinking at all outside the lab instructions» (2)
- `~!@#$%^&*(),"/.,<>?:"» (4)

14. Laboratory exercises: The Szilard-Chalmers Process - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 2 15%

4» 6 46%

5» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.76 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The least relevant laboration.» (2)
- hard questions, especially when not remembering the labs.» (4)

15. Laboratory exercises: The Szilard-Chalmers Process - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 7 53%

4» 3 23%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Laboratory exercises: The Szilard-Chalmers Process - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Dr. Augusto Hernandez-Solis, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 6 46%

4» 5 38%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Confusing» (2)
- Not at all a chemist...» (3)

17. Laboratory exercises: Gamma spectrometry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 1 7%

4» 5 38%

5» 7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Laboratory exercises: Gamma spectrometry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

13 svarande

1» 3 23%

2» 2 15%

3» 6 46%

4» 1 7%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.61 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too easy» (1)

19. Laboratory exercises: Gamma spectrometry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc. Elin Löfström-Engdahl if applicable, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 4 30%

4» 3 23%

5» 6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. Laboratory exercises: Chemical dosimetry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 2 15%

4» 2 15%

5» 8 61%

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The dosimetry does not feel very relevant, but the methods involved were relevant (radiating, measuring)» (2)

21. Laboratory exercises: Chemical dosimetry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 4 30%

3» 6 46%

4» 2 15%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. Laboratory exercises: Chemical dosimetry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc Hanna Hedström, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 5 38%

4» 4 30%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.92 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Afraid of thinking at all outside the lab instructions» (3)

23. Laboratory exercises: Growth and decay of the isomer Ba-137m - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 4 30%

4» 5 38%

5» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

24. Laboratory exercises: Growth and decay of the isomer Ba-137m - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 3 23%

3» 4 30%

4» 3 23%

5» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Felt like we were jumping into something without any real start» (5)

25. Laboratory exercises: Growth and decay of the isomer Ba-137m - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc. Sabrina Tietze, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 6 46%

4» 3 23%

5» 2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Supervisor dii"t know what to do.» (2)
- Demanded more than the others for the report, which is a good thing» (3)
- my group had Joakim instead of Sabrina since she was not here that day» (4)

26. Laboratory exercises: Reaction rate for isotopic exchange - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

12 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 1 8%

4» 7 58%

5» 4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

27. Laboratory exercises: Reaction rate for isotopic exchange - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 6 46%

4» 4 30%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

28. Laboratory exercises: Reaction rate for isotopic exchange - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Dr. Stellan Holgersson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 1 7%

4» 7 53%

5» 5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Answered all questions with relevant and good answers. Good explanations of the chemistry involved. Best supervisor!» (5)

29. Laboratory exercises: Practical radiochemistry work - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 4 30%

4» 3 23%

5» 6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good start» (5)

30. Laboratory exercises: Practical radiochemistry work - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

13 svarande

1» 9 69%

2» 3 23%

3» 0 0%

4» 1 7%

5» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

31. Laboratory exercises: Practical radiochemistry work - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Dr. Stefan Allard, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 1 7%

4» 7 53%

5» 5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Low and steady pace, which was good to get used to the equipment.» (5)

32. Calculation exercises: relevance

Please grade how relevant the calculation exercises in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 3 23%

4» 5 38%

5» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.69 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Sorry, but the calculations on the board was mostly rewriting a solution from a paper, a solution which was often not very good ...» (2)
- It did not feel ready after the calculation exercices» (3)

33. Calculation exercises: difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the calculation exercises in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

13 svarande

1» 2 15%

2» 0 0%

3» 6 46%

4» 5 38%

5» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The questions in the book are slightly to numerical, to little thinking on quite alot of them. Good with old exam questions.» (1)

34. Calculation exercises: handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 5 38%

4» 4 30%

5» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.69 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

35. Calculation exercises: number of occasions

Would you have liked more calculation exercises to cover the course?

13 svarande

Yes» 10 76%

No» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 1.23

36. Calculation exercises: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 7 53%

4» 4 30%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- didn"t have any questions to ask ._.» (3)

37. Calculation exercises: supervisors

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Kristian Larsson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 3 23%

4» 8 61%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.69 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- To tell the truth, I can"t distinguish Kristian and Joachim...» (3)
- Good on answering questions. Unafraid of new ways of thinking compared to most other people (supervisors, lectures) met in the course.» (4)

38. Calculation exercises: supervisors

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Joachim Holm, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 2 15%

2» 2 15%

3» 3 23%

4» 6 46%

5» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I don"t really know if he is so terrible or it"s just his bad English.» (1)

39. General: Workload

Please indicate how you perceive the 7.5 hp workload, with 1 being "very low" and 5 "very high".

13 svarande

1» 1 7%

2» 0 0%

3» 2 15%

4» 3 23%

5» 7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- we used 10^6 horsepower to do this course. I think it deserves at least 15. I think everyone agrees that we didn"t focus on the nuclear reactor course and all our focus was on the Chemistry course so if both were 15 hp. then 12.5 for the chemistry and 2.5 for the reactor» (1)
- ????» (3)
- Lots of reading...» (4)
- this is if one wishes to aim for highest grade, would be somewhere around 4 if one aims for passing» (5)
- Absolutely too high, it is not that I don"t want to learn, but you like to include so much different areas make two courses. It would not have been possible to have two equaly demanding courses like the "Nuclear Chemistry" course in the same period. And that should always be possible for a hard working student.» (5)

40. General: Textbook

Please grade the book "Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry", with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 1 7%

4» 4 30%

5» 6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.07 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It covers a lot in a small space so there were some parts that one felt that they were not covered efficiently. and you can"t really understand a certain topic with only this book as a reference. but the tracer chapter 9 was good. may be because it"s pure chemistry.» (2)
- But a little bit to much maybe» (4)

41. General: Administration

Please grade the course administration in general, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 15%

3» 4 30%

4» 5 38%

5» 2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.53 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the whole course was too much for 6 weeks. plus labs were so condensed and were a burden that took our attention from studying for the exam» (3)
- ????» (4)

42. General: Information

Please indicate how well course information was provided, with 1 being "terribly" and 5 "excellently".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 7%

3» 5 38%

4» 6 46%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.53 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- what was covered was great but was not covered is not related to what was covered so how come some parts were covered and others were not.» (2)
- Keep the course page updated!» (3)
- could have used a few more old exams but not really essential» (4)

43. Exam

Please indicate how well the exam reflected the course, with 1 being "poorly" and 5 "very well".

13 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 4 30%

3» 3 23%

4» 5 38%

5» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the theoretical part reflected the lectures. the exercises were not related to what we have seen in the calculation exercises. I am not saying that you should give us the exam typically, but we needed more training and a lot of exercises to solve because that will give us experience and will help us study the large amount in an interactive way, by working through problems and looking for solution methodologies in the book. I mean the large amount of equations in the book will make no sense unless I apply them. That is when I will gain the sense of what they really mean. and we must do that before the exam, then you can examine us about anything in the book. I believe the supplied amount of calculative exercises were insufficient to make us gain the experience we need to construct a thinking methodology and a tacit knowledge of the practical part of the course. without increasing the supplied amount of exercises, I believe you should examine us by a take home exams as long as it will be related to the textbook, and don"t caused us stressed by the limited amount of time» (2)
- Many areas were omitted in the exam and some areas were found several of the questions, did not feel very representative. Also a big problem with time, the questions were too time consuming for a 4 hour exam, I would have needed 5 hours.» (2)
- Reflected the course well, but with many tricky questions (perhaps unnecessarily so)» (4)
- The calculations are annoying. Emphases can be more clear.» (4)
- Good questions» (4)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.68

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.68
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.67

Kursutvärderingssystem från