ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Improvement Processes- 2010, TEK310

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-11-01 - 2010-11-15
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: azadeh najafi»

Your own effort

1. How large part of the lectures/ excercises offered did you attend?

20 svarande

76%-100%»14 70%
51%-75%»3 15%
26%-50%»1 5%
0-25%»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

- Good course!» (76%-100%)

General Impression

2. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Very Positive»9 45%
Positive»10 50%
Negative»1 5%
Very Negative»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.6

- insightful» (Very Positive)
- I liked the studyclimat of the course. Everyone was there to learn and the discussions were good. I also learned alot from the articles. » (Very Positive)
- Good course. I have tought alot about the topics even after the course, and they have changed how i value different aspects of organizational change. but perhaps it would have been good to also have some sort of course textbook, or some more theory that would be the " right way" of doing things. Even tough I understand that this could be hard to arrange.» (Positive)
- I would have liked a more theoretical base presented through "classical" lectures» (Negative)

Goals and Goal Fulfillment

The course PM states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e. knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be acquired by the students during the course.
Learning Outcome:
The course participants will gain knowledge of strategy and change theories and quality inspired improvement approaches and an in-depth understanding of one more narrow area. They will also have an ability to critically view consultants packaging of change and improvement project offerings.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/ read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 35%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this question and the succeeding one only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»20 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

Yes, definitely»10 55%
To some extent»7 38%
No, not at all»0 0%
I do not know/ have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

- Because of the nature of the examination it was a bit hard to prove to what extent one had understood the concepts.» (To some extent)
- The knowledge of strategy and change theories and quality inspired improvement approaches is not really tested even though it is very much discussed.» (To some extent)
- I don"t know if the examination (term paper) actually assess that the goal is reached but I think that the mandatory questions for the seminars and the active participation do so.» (To some extent)
- The examination was maybe a little fuzzy, since there was no exam. but this is not always negative» (To some extent)
- It"s a bit hard to know about the examination system, how much every assignment is worth in the final grading. Most of the time in the course was spent on the seminars, but I don"t know how that is valued.» (I do not know/ have not been examined yet)

Learning

6. To what extent did the lectures contribute to your learning?

20 svarande

Great extent»5 25%
Large extent»7 35%
Some extent»6 30%
Small extent»1 5%
I did not participate»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- I did not participate on all the lectures.» (Some extent)
- A theoretical framework (in the form of a book) would have been convenient for me. » (Some extent)
- The lectures and articles could have a closer connection.» (Some extent)
- The lectures could run of to different topic that was not really the content of the course. So many try to have more focused lectures.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent did the supervision sessions contribute to your learning?

19 svarande

Great extent»1 5%
Large extent»7 36%
Some extent»5 26%
Small extent»5 26%
I did not participate»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.89

- These could be more concise. There should also be a compulsory supervision and also a hand in mid term.» (Some extent)
- These were more of a guidance when trying to find a good angle of the project.» (Small extent)
- Only had one supervision » (Small extent)

8. To what extent did the guest lectures contribute to your learning?

Matrisfråga

Herman Fahlström, Hamed Hakimian, and Juan Manuel Pinilla- Astra Tech
20 svarande

Great extent»1 5%
Large extent»3 15%
Some extent»9 45%
Small extent»2 10%
I did not participate»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

SIQ Seminar- IBM & Volvo
20 svarande

Great extent»2 10%
Large extent»5 25%
Some extent»5 25%
Small extent»3 15%
I did not participate»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Marcus Assarlind- Chalmers
20 svarande

Great extent»2 10%
Large extent»9 45%
Some extent»5 25%
Small extent»0 0%
I did not participate»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Clas Melby- IVF
20 svarande

Great extent»3 15%
Large extent»5 25%
Some extent»6 30%
Small extent»1 5%
I did not participate»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

Stefan Book & Magnus Marmgren- Effort
20 svarande

Great extent»2 10%
Large extent»6 30%
Some extent»7 35%
Small extent»2 10%
I did not participate»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Sari Scheinberg- Chalmers Industriteknik (CIT)
20 svarande

Great extent»6 30%
Large extent»3 15%
Some extent»4 20%
Small extent»0 0%
I did not participate»7 35%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

9. To what extent did the course literature/ articles contribute to your learning?

20 svarande

Great extent»12 60%
Large extent»8 40%
Some extent»0 0%
Small extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- a very good mix of articles (even if some of them are quite difficult to read..)» (Great extent)
- Most of the articles were very interesting and they still make me think about different things in a new way.» (Great extent)

10. To what extent did the literature seminars contribute to your learning?

20 svarande

Great extent»12 60%
Large extent»3 15%
Some extent»3 15%
Small extent»0 0%
I did not participate»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- I think they were the best literature seminars so far in the masters program.» (Great extent)
- seminars are really the things i prefered in this course!» (Great extent)
- Very good semiars, but the first question was always discussed to a larger extent then the others.I think that the seminar leader should have tried to end the discussion earlier so that all topics could be adressed.» (Great extent)
- The literature seminars where the most giving i ever have had! and i have realized that Sverker contributed alot to this! great work!» (Great extent)
- Very good seminars» (Great extent)
- More time should be spent on these sessions» (Large extent)
- The seminars in themselves did not offer so much more knowledge, rather was it the preparations for the seminars that helped.» (Some extent)
- I did not like the way the seminars were carried through, it is stress full with the marking that sverker did. it feels like you have to say something and that it doesn"t matter what you say. I would prefer if he listened to the small group discussions as well.» (Some extent)

11. To what extent did the term papers contribute to your learning?

20 svarande

Great extent»8 40%
Large extent»7 35%
Some extent»5 25%
Small extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- This paper has a very vague connection to the rest of the course but is a the same time interesting. The topics could be more defined and in that way connected to the literature or the lectures. » (Some extent)

Course Administration

12. How well did the course administration i.e. web page, hand outs, etc. work?

20 svarande

Great extent»11 55%
Large extent»7 35%
Some extent»2 10%
Small extent»0 0%
I did not participate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

- Especially tnaks for on time powerpoint uploads» (Great extent)
- The web page for uploading files is worthless but this is handled without any problems.» (Great extent)
- A bit too late course PM.» (Large extent)
- could be improved » (Some extent)

Study Climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very good»14 70%
Rather good»5 25%
Rather poor»1 5%
Very poor»0 0%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.35

- Great support from teachers.» (Very good)
- During the semiars alot of opportunities for sharing knowledge and asking questions was present» (Very good)
- The communication is perfectly open and good, sometimes almost too good. More constructive critique would be great during the feedback sessions.» (Rather good)
- I would prefer more supervision of the term paper» (Rather poor)

14. How well did the cooperation between you and the fellow students work?

20 svarande

Very good»12 60%
Rather good»7 35%
Rather poor»1 5%
Very poor»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.45

15. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Adequate/ Low»6 30%
Adequate/ High»14 70%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- Adequate - Enough» (Adequate/ Low)
- The workload depends a great deal on how much effort you put into the term paper.» (Adequate/ High)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Adequate/ Low»3 15%
Adequate/ High»11 57%
Too high»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

Summarizing Questions

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the structure of teaching »
- the term project should be preserved»
- The seminars»
- Literature seminars»
- The seminares»
- The discussion seminars»
- Everything! Articles, guest lecturers and termpaper.»
- The way the literature seminars are organized with a lot of participation and discussions»
- everything.. but especially the literature reading and seminars having a small group was also a very good thing for this course!»
- the course material (papers)»
- The type of articles that were chosen for the course. Term paper was interesting also. »
- the structure of the seminars.»
- Literature seminars»
- the term paper. i also liked that we were supposed to hand in questions before the seminar which we discussed, this is because i learned a lot and really thought about what i was reading»
- Seminars»
- Literature»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more mandatory classes»
- Some of the articles could be replaced. A bit clearer guidence when choosing topic. Now the boundaries were too loose and it was really hard to choose a good topic. A lot of time was therefore wasted in the beginning resulting in poorer quality.»
- More theory to hold on, to give a basis. »
- Non-mandatory lectures.»
- The red thread connection projects, lectures and the papers.»
- course shedule»
- More lectures»
- different grading on the seminars, more supervision of term paper»
- Students ,)»

19. Would you recommend this course to other students?

- yes »
- Yes»
- I am not sure what I have actually learned during the course. The overall impression is that it was a bit too fuzzy and the different modules were somewhat loosely connected. Therefore I would not recommend the course but I would not warn anyone either.»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Depending on the person, it is of great importance that you feel comfortable speaking in teams. »
- Yes»
- yes of course!»
- Definitely»
- definitly!»
- yes»
- Definitely »
- yes!!!»
- If there were more lectures»
- not for qom students, i did not gain so much new knowledge, but maybe for other students»
- Yes»
- Yes»

20. Do you have any additional comments?

- Time for reflection after the term paper should be given and guided. The seminars should be more controlled by the teacher. As it was now, some people took a lot of space. When having said too much, the teacher should be given athority too "silence" these in favor for other persons.»
- No»
- Thank you for an interesting course and also for being kind and flexible to change the schedule to fit the other courses. »
- Good climat for learning in this course! I learned alot and enjoyed the course!»
- I think the emphasize on the course paper that we had to hand in was very low. it would be better if the lecturer talk about it during lectures to make sure that the progress is made in each group. Also I think the tutoring sessions were not so helpful mainly because the examinor of the course didn"t read the papers before the sessions, or even if he have read he didn"t have constructive suggestions for how to continue. he only answered the questions right away. Also I think that the literature seminars could be leaded better and more efficient so that some predetermined results may gained.»
- Not realy, thanks for a great course and new knowledge!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från