ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biomedical instrumentation, SSY090, HT2007

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-14 - 2008-01-11
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 9 42%

Around 20 hours/week» 10 47%

Around 25 hours/week» 1 4%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 4%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 4%

75%» 8 38%

100%» 12 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.52

- The lectures where horrible bad and did more bad than good for my understanding.» (50%)
- I had to go back to France for personal reasons so I missed a whole week.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 3 15%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 5%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 3 15%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 13 65%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 17 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 2 11%

Yes, definitely» 11 64%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- I think the examination with a project work and a voluntary home exam is very good. » (?)
- The laboration was good but, the hand-in problems should be more clear and test more knowledge, since they acts examination.» (To some extent)
- It was nice with this hand-in-examine » (Yes, definitely)
- I did not assess the examination and prefered to pass with grade 3.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent» 2 9%

Some extent» 1 4%

Large extent» 11 52%

Great extent» 7 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Since I took the Image processing course, Image analysis is not that difficult.» (Small extent)
- I think the teaching as well as cource literature doesn"t meet up to my expectations to a master course.» (Small extent)
- The lectures were very good, and I like the element of guest lectures » (Great extent)
- The hand outs from the teacher were very good. I think that the legal background of medical products were not enough.» (Great extent)
- Very good teacher. Always available for the students.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent» 1 4%

Some extent» 6 28%

Large extent» 11 52%

Great extent» 3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Old and not very good literature» (Small extent)
- Book, internet and kollegues» (Large extent)
- The book was very useful.» (Large extent)
- very good book. very detailed.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 2 10%

Rather well» 5 25%

Very well» 13 65%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- It would be very helpful with the material from the lectures avaliable on the web page (for people like me that are not good at taking notes)» (Rather badly)
- Information was ofter out very late, for this information mail should be used instead.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 1 4%

Very good» 20 95%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- Very helpful and good treatment.» (Very good)
- I think the Christmas dinner was a great idea. Keep doing it.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 23%

Very well» 16 76%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- It would not be negative to have "mixed" groups to meet all new class mates.» (Rather well)
- Very good with other erasmus students but quite poor with swedes.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low» 1 4%

Low» 2 9%

Adequate» 17 80%

High» 1 4%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- I were expecting more covered and detaild theoretical background and understanding.» (Too low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 4%

Adequate» 12 57%

High» 7 33%

Too high» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Image processing and analysis demanded some effort but medicine for the engineer and this course were too easy.» (Low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor» 1 4%

Fair» 1 4%

Adequate» 4 19%

Good» 8 38%

Excellent» 7 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- I gave a good overview of the medical instrumentation field. The connection with industries was very good. The lab was good. » (Good)
- Very interesting» (Excellent)
- Very interesting» (Excellent)
- very interesting» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The prject, thoug it should be more flexible. We meat a company that askt for a specific work and it would have been much more interestig to work with that.»
- LABs»
- The visit tour at Sahlgrenska and the ECG-laboration»
- The course is arranged reasonably, and inviting Lectures have amounts of information»
- The lab and the guest lectures. »
- All of it, especially the laboration and the project work»
- BO plus everything»
- Christmas dinner Companies studies Lab»
- the lab.»
- The Lab was great!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lectures, loose the slides and use the blackboard instead - there"s no point sittning by the computer and ravel, focus instead of how the lecturing is persieved. »
- The book and the cource content should be more extensive.»
- It would be good with more sources of information for doing the homeworks than the lectures and the book. The book could have been better at explaining what works when and so on.. »
- -»
- Maybe another short laboration? or some other hand outs?»
- THe project could be changed to something more based on techniques/materials/procedures than on a company.»

16. Additional comments

- It could be interesting to make more use of guest lectures to cover the course content in a proffessional manner suitable for master level of studies.»
- Very interesting course»

Kursutvärderingssystem från