ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation Wastewater engineering, BOM095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-11-01 - 2010-11-20
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Britt-Marie Wilen»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 15%
Around 20 hours/week»10 50%
Around 25 hours/week»5 25%
Around 30 hours/week»2 10%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- Vår andra kurs. Environmental analysis of water tog alldells för mycket tid.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- We spent much time on projects and maybe not enough in exercises (in order to prepare exam).» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»12 60%
100%»8 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»16 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- goals should perhaps be more detailed on examination part (12 pts min on each part, 2 or 3 exercises ? etc) conditions etc» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 94%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- I have heard most things before why some things were less interesting. I think that it was to mutch repetition. » (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»9 45%
Yes, definitely»9 45%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- Men att britt-maria på tenta dagen säger att vi inte får använda uppgiften för activated sludge på tenta är ju lite av en skandal. Sånt borde ju klaras ut långt innan eftersom direktiven var att alla information förutom lösta exempel fick användas på tentan. Amatörmässigt.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 10%
Large extent»13 65%
Great extent»5 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- very good availability of all teachers and questions were answered. And questionned sometimes! very interesting feedback in general. » (Large extent)
- Britt-maries slides är väldigt svåra att förstå när man tittat igenom dom under tenta veckorna.» (Large extent)
- Definitely the teachers provide a good learning atmosphere, with great enthusiasm to help students learn» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»4 20%
Some extent»4 20%
Large extent»8 40%
Great extent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- I didn"t use that much the compendium. » (Large extent)
- Especially the swmm exercise.» (Large extent)
- Lecture notes were quite unorganised» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 10%
Rather well»9 45%
Very well»9 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Changes in lecture time.» (Rather badly)
- It seemed as if all teachers were a bit stressed this year, and the booking of the lecture halls didnt work well. » (Rather badly)
- Sidan låg nere ibland.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 20%
Very good»16 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- During exercises more teachers would have neem good. many students = many questions» (Rather good)
- Yes help was always available when needed» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 30%
Very well»14 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- Most students are able to work cooperatively and especially in group work» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»14 70%
High»4 20%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Having 2 major projects at once made it quite heavy at times, however, overall the work load was sufficient» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 30%
High»10 50%
Too high»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- I took "envinronmental analysis of water" that has a high working load.» (High)
- I also had analysis of water, and it required alot more time then wastewater (to many projects and presentations), why this course has suffered a bit. Better balance between the courses next year would be good. » (High)
- Environmental water analysis is very demanding all the time with short deadlines.» (Too high)

Course content

13. How did you find the lectures?

20 svarande

very poor»0 0%
rather poor»0 0%
rather good»7 35%
very good»9 45%
excellent»4 20%
no comment»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- hard to say something on lectures very different from one to the other.» (rather good)

14. How did you find the exercises?

20 svarande

very poor»0 0%
rather poor»1 5%
rather good»7 35%
very good»10 50%
excellent»2 10%
no comment»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- The SWMM exersise was a little bit hard to understand and made the group assignments hard to coordinate in the groups, who should do what etc.. To time consuming to attend both for everybody in the group.» (rather good)
- There are some errors in corrections.» (rather good)
- Although, often solutions were wrong and unorganised.» (very good)

15. How did you find the SWMM assignment?

19 svarande

very poor»0 0%
rather poor»5 26%
rather good»8 42%
very good»4 21%
excellent»1 5%
no comment»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- two projects run at the same time, so we had to divide the group in 2 parts. Some of us has no idea about the SWMM exercise but have a good idea about the treatment plant design.» (?)
- It was not so helpful. If this was run seperately to the other project assignment then more could have been taken from it.» (rather poor)
- It could be more organised.» (rather good)
- The software could be a bit tricky sometimes but a very good way of learning.» (very good)

16. How did you find the wastewater treatment plant design assignment?

20 svarande

very poor»0 0%
rather poor»0 0%
rather good»7 35%
very good»9 45%
excellent»3 15%
no comment»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- little bit hard to follow all steps sometimes» (rather good)
- we did not have enough time to do the assignment after we have learned what we need to know.» (rather good)
- it should count a little and having corrections elements would be awesome. Also having design from other group could be very nice.» (very good)
- It can be more guided.» (very good)
- This was a good overall learning process of the course. Often vague process about how to go about it, but it did create much good discussion and this in turn lead to the right path. » (very good)
- I think with this assignment, I have learned something, which I maybe can use later on in work.» (excellent)

17. How did you find the weekly assignments?

20 svarande

very poor»0 0%
rather poor»2 10%
rather good»5 25%
very good»8 40%
excellent»4 20%
no comment»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Good, not too much reading and some good points that needed to be thought about. » (rather good)
- I didn"t do them enough. I feel like i missed something today.» (very good)
- shows what you have gained individually, and you "have to read" and catch up. It is good to have these.. 200 words are though too little, maybe 400, otherwise you put efforts on the amount of words rather than the quality» (very good)
- As said in drinking water I think this is a very good way of following the course.» (very good)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 25%
Good»11 55%
Excellent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- To general and to much repetition. For example I think it was the third time we had area-time method on a exam. » (Adequate)
- Hoping to have it indeed! Will do more for DWE, hoping to get both.» (Good)
- I really liked this course. It was interesting, taught well and overall I feel a lot has been learnt. » (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Weekly Assignments. Design of Treatment Plant. SWMM exercise.»
- Smile.»
- Weekly assingnments»
- weekly assignments and exam»
- the illustration of the exercises»
- SWIMM exercises and the project work. »
- The teachers! Class exercises, study visit at the end of the course was really helpful rather than prior to. »
- study-visit, the assignments»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Projects should be run one after another not at the same time. The deadline was at the same time so we had to work seperately.»
- The amount of people in each group should be smaller. This in order to make everyone to work in both assignments.»
- All the part about treatment of wastewater was unclearly explained. There should be a more precise scheme of the processes occurring in a wastewater treatment plant. »
- Some lectures was not understandable. I think it should be better in a sense of communication.»
- Put pagenumbers in the compendium Skip SWMM or have more teachers available for questions etc.. Make sure all students has the right litterature during exam, not that some dont have soulutions and some has, it is not fair otherwise and looks more proffesional. »
- the time schedule of the WWTP design assignment. It is better if there is enough time to do the work after we have learned the whole processes.»
- The project work could definetly be done more with.»
- combining both projects, A more organised lecture compendium»
- More information about the exams are useful, specially the allowed aids»

21. Additional comments

- Thanks»
- I found it a really interesting course and I specially enjoyed the visit to the WWTP»
- It is a good course, I like the urban drainage part.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från