Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPRSS: RRY015 Space Science and Techniques Sp1, 10/11, RRY015
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-10-29 - 2010-11-08 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.6 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 16% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 16% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 16% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 6 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 2 | | 33% |
100%» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 4.66 - The lectures were good and interesting enough for me to attend 100% but Monday mornings prevented it» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?6 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 50% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.3 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 3 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 20% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?6 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 9. What is your opinion about the group work6 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Not useful, I learned only little from the discussions» | | 0 | | 0% |
Useful, I learned much from the discussions» | | 4 | | 66% |
Very useful, I learned very much from the discussions» | | 2 | | 33% |
Too little time scheduled» | | 1 | | 16% |
Adequate time scheduled» | | 3 | | 50% |
Too much time scheduled» | | 1 | | 16% |
The groups were too small» | | 0 | | 0% |
The groups were of adequate size» | | 3 | | 50% |
The groups were too large» | | 0 | | 0% |
10. Suggest how the group work can be improved next year!- More simulation is better. I think two person each group is better.»
- itisok»
- I think additional time would have been useful to work in groups since it felt like one hurried a lot to make sure everything was done. Maybe require more work for the groups since it was most useful»
Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?6 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 83% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 16% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 13. How was the course workload?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 16% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 66% |
High» | | 1 | | 16% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 14. How was the total workload this study period?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 50% |
High» | | 3 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5
Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 16% |
Good» | | 2 | | 33% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - Interesting» (Excellent)
16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The group works»
- Group project, group exercise and quiz. »
- project»
- The lectures, very useful. Like how they always start at a suitably low level and work from there. Individual hand ins for group work was very useful addition, forced you to think again about the things discussed and focus on some aspect. »
17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Altitude control should be taught as earlier as possible.»
- nothing»
- If one missed a lecture it was hard to read up on the information on your own. Books did not always cover everything lectures did»
18. Additional comments- I like this course and the teaching style. Teachers are very kind and helpful .I am satisfied with this course. »
- no»
- Interesting course»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|