ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Image analysis, SSY095, HT2007

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-14 - 2008-01-11
Antal svar: 28
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

28 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 13 46%

Around 20 hours/week» 7 25%

Around 25 hours/week» 5 17%

Around 30 hours/week» 2 7%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 3%

Genomsnitt: 1.96

- 50 hours in total» (At most 15 hours/week)
- There was an appropriate amount of work in the course. » (At most 15 hours/week)
- 8 hours» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

28 svarande

0%» 1 3%

25%» 2 7%

50%» 5 17%

75%» 13 46%

100%» 7 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

- I went to three lectures, after that I had had enough of bad preparations, confusing explanations and erroneous exercise solutions.» (25%)
- There was a conflict with another lecture. Materials in Medicine» (50%)
- It was good that all the material was on the web. But I often got the impression that the lectures were ill prepared. Tomas often was looking randomly for an appropriate example to show. » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

28 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 8 28%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 3%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 11 39%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 8 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.67

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

24 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 2 8%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 21 87%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.95

- The course was FAR too easy.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Hard as first Image course» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

25 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 9 36%

Yes, definitely» 11 44%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 5 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- Why ask new stuff that didn"t come up during class? I didn"t take the image processing course so it was rather difficult for me» (To some extent)
- The exam was a bit tricky» (To some extent)
- Seams very hard» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

27 svarande

Small extent» 3 11%

Some extent» 11 40%

Large extent» 7 25%

Great extent» 6 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.59

- It was hard to keep up during the lectures. There were no red line through them. I belive the teacher could prepare a little bit better to make everything more clear.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent» 4 14%

Some extent» 9 32%

Large extent» 9 32%

Great extent» 6 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- The course litterature is not very good. I would recommend the course litterature in Image Processing, and use hand-outs as a complement. That book is better and you don"t need to buy both books.» (Small extent)
- The book is to hard, but the info om homepage is good» (Some extent)
- I did not read the course book much, but the lectures notes on the homepage were useful. » (Some extent)
- The course notes let me pass the exam without prior studying.» (Large extent)
- Good lecture notes» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

28 svarande

Very badly» 1 3%

Rather badly» 4 14%

Rather well» 10 35%

Very well» 13 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Why weren"t all labs avaliable from the beginning?» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

28 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 3%

Rather good» 10 35%

Very good» 15 53%

I did not seek help» 2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

28 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 8 28%

Very well» 19 67%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

11. How was the course workload?

28 svarande

Too low» 1 3%

Low» 5 17%

Adequate» 14 50%

High» 8 28%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.03

- Many many hours in matlab» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

28 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 2 7%

Adequate» 14 50%

High» 9 32%

Too high» 3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- I took 26 credits this period and was away for two weeks.» (High)
- I had four different courses and the high workload was doe to this and not to much or to high workload for single courses.» (Too high)
- i took 3 courses» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

27 svarande

Poor» 3 11%

Fair» 2 7%

Adequate» 4 14%

Good» 15 55%

Excellent» 3 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.48

- Too easy, too basic, bad lectures. The course should be revised, nothing has changed since its creation.» (Poor)
- Intressting but hard. » (Fair)
- I like the opportunity to work on the labs and the project whenever you want. » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The labs!»
- Laborations»
- The book.»
- course material on the web. The company guest lecturers were also appreciated. »
- The content of the course is comprehensive and good »
- I love when some companies and some Phd students came to talk a bit about real things.»
- The laborations were quite good and connected somewhat with the other parts of the course.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The laborations should definitely be looked over. The lab PM"s and the given programs were both poorly written with either errors in them or hard to understand.»
- Less numerical exercises on the black board.. It would be better to do more exercises on concepts and discuss the results rather than performing addition and multiplication on the board.. »
- nothing»
- Everything except the book»
- Better prepared lectures. The were som errors in the code examples of some of the lab PMs that took a lot of time to find out. »
- Better prepared teachers »
- Some exercises»
- The lectures were really bad, with poor quality of the material and the slides were hard to follow and even harder to read up on. The project were poorly administrated with no guidance what so ever, so we really worked in the blind. »
- The big project was too small. »

16. Additional comments

- Good course, with a suitable level for everyone. For those who are good at programming and took the Image Processing course before, it"s quite easy.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från